ThreadBoard ArchivesSite FeaturesActiveworlds SupportHistoric Archives |
Trusted Sources (Sdk)
Trusted Sources // SdkweeboJul 24, 2003, 3:43pm
How would anybody (newbies and old timers) that came to AW environment know
the difference of the "trusted sources" unless the sources have been tested, approved, and posted on a d/l site? Weebo johnJul 24, 2003, 3:52pm
strike rapierJul 24, 2003, 4:03pm
www.imabot.com
www.imatowns.com www.activeworlds.com www.mauz.info www.virtuallylearning.com http://objects.activeworlds.com www.aweduserve.org Off top of my head [View Quote] strike rapierJul 24, 2003, 5:31pm
bowenJul 24, 2003, 5:32pm
[View Quote]
LoL, don't forget http://www.oct31.de/aw/ (below his war stuff).
-- --Bowen-- No of SETI units returned: 44 Processing time: 36 days, 0 hours. (Total hours: 864) www.setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu ananasJul 24, 2003, 5:37pm
And what about http://andras.net ?
And XelaG's (sorry, I don't have it handy on this box)? And ... You have quite some work now that you have started this ;) [View Quote] builderzJul 24, 2003, 5:47pm
Here are a few more:
XelaG Bots http://www.imatowns.com/xelagot AW News http://www.awnews.org/html/ 3D Host http://www.3dhost.net/ Magsbot http://www.turtleflight.com/magine/mb.html Builderz http://www.3dhost.net r i c h a r dJul 24, 2003, 5:55pm
I telegramed Calpantera about that he said he was thinking of the same thing
<TELEGRAM QUOTE> Telegram from Calpantera, sent Wed Jul 23, 2003 18:58: I was thinking the same thing. Maybe even having the installers created, code signed and hosted by AW </TELEGRAM QUOTE> r i c h a r dJul 24, 2003, 5:57pm
Oh and john lay off smaping my site on AW www.xeonsoft.co.uk does aw related
bots and soon to host worlds. If ppl find Xw on there then fine but dont go smapping a non related stuff spam for my bots if you have to. stecloudJul 24, 2003, 6:21pm
I could be wrong, but I thought Weebo's question was "how would newbies know
which is a trusted source or not, when first coming to AW. Its all very good spewing loads of URLs you know are safe - but how did you discover they were safe? robbieJul 24, 2003, 7:22pm
How about:
http://ts.oriox.com http://www.oriox.com/3d.html Those are my AW Resources :) -Robbie [View Quote] kahJul 24, 2003, 10:34pm
"r i c h a r d" <richard.lazenby1 at ntlworld.com> wrote in
news:3f2039a3$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com: > I telegramed Calpantera about that he said he was thinking of the same > thing > > <TELEGRAM QUOTE> > > Telegram from Calpantera, sent Wed Jul 23, 2003 18:58: > > I was thinking the same thing. Maybe even having the installers > created, code signed and hosted by AW > > </TELEGRAM QUOTE> Ugh. That's rather paranoid if you ask me. The simple solution is educating people not to open anything at all, as has happened here. And while we're discussion trusted sources, that was just what our friend M a t t exploited to distribute it, first take a few citizenships, then abusing the trust others had in the stolen accounts to further distribute it. Don't just accept a bot/application without even asking what it does ("toolkit for AW" tells a *lot*, doesn't it...), or without getting a demo. If you do accept something and it seems suspisious to you, investigate it. Look in your process list (under Win9x/ME you won't get access to all processes through CTRL+ALT+DEL unfortunately), in your registry, etc. A packet sniffer can be usefull too. I doubt everyone is going to be willing to give out their sourcecode to AWI, and what would it help to have it code signed and hosted by them if it's really a trojan? KAH builderzJul 25, 2003, 12:38pm
If you'll read my other posts, you'll notice that my signature always
has my hosting URL on it. I just didn't take it out of my signature for that post and it was listed twice. :) Builderz http://www.3dhost.net [View Quote] rossyboyJul 25, 2003, 1:13pm
Exactly. Plus it was very easy to see this was a trojan... this was no AW
utility site - there wasn't even an SITE for you to look at. "kah" <kah at kahnews.cjb.net> wrote this (news:Xns93C319AEA3C40kahatkahnewsdotcjbdo at 64.94.241.201) in general.discussion on 25 Jul 2003: > "r i c h a r d" <richard.lazenby1 at ntlworld.com> wrote in > news:3f2039a3$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com: > > > Ugh. That's rather paranoid if you ask me. The simple solution is > educating people not to open anything at all, as has happened here. > And while we're discussion trusted sources, that was just what our > friend M a t t exploited to distribute it, first take a few > citizenships, then abusing the trust others had in the stolen accounts > to further distribute it. > > Don't just accept a bot/application without even asking what it does > ("toolkit for AW" tells a *lot*, doesn't it...), or without getting a > demo. If you do accept something and it seems suspisious to you, > investigate it. Look in your process list (under Win9x/ME you won't > get access to all processes through CTRL+ALT+DEL unfortunately), in > your registry, etc. A packet sniffer can be usefull too. > > I doubt everyone is going to be willing to give out their sourcecode > to AWI, and what would it help to have it code signed and hosted by > them if it's really a trojan? > > KAH > joemanJul 25, 2003, 2:21pm
|