|
new list of stolen object passwords circulating (Community)
new list of stolen object passwords circulating // Community
Mar 15, 2004, 6:25pm
I would suggest AW *Cough* to put that into support, credit of KF.
--
Signed,
TheMask
:: Owner of Delusional-Minds Hosting ::
Free world hosting.. Just a T-Gram will do it.
http://www.delusional-minds.com
[View Quote]"kf" <none at junk.mail> wrote in message news:4055F6F1.42AB at junk.mail...
> To give you all an impression how long it takes to decrypt a file or
> find a password, I give you some numbers.
>
> I post this since some people seem to think that the so-called "password
> crackers" are some higher beings with abilties not from this world -
> which they are not, it actually takes less of a brain that a script
> kiddy would need...
>
> This only applies to retrieving a password form a zip file when you have
> the file, it does NOT apply to obtaining a password in the course of
> transmission (eg. by listening to the server-client data exchange).
>
> What I needed:
>
> a) the zipped file - password protected
> b) the zipped file - without password
>
> Usually a potential attacker can easily obtain the second by buying an
> object. Now he downloads the encrypted version from the developers OP
> (which usually has the same name, or the name can be obtained somehow).
>
> What I needed to do:
>
> Run a zipcrack program (which can be easily obtained by buying or
> leeching it).
>
> Results:
>
> - With a password of 9 characters or less, I needed 24s (SECONDS!) to
> un-encrypt the password - leaving now the whole OP open for
> all-you-can-download actions, a 10 character password took no longer
> than 34s. (System: P4/3500 MHz)
>
> Conclusion:
>
> Passwords of 10 characters or less are unsafe to a degree that you can
> as well not use a password at all, while longer password are not more
> safe, but only less unsafe.
>
> It would nt take me wonder when most worlds from the "cracked" passwords
> list had only short passwords, which could be obtained literally in a
> matter of seconds.
>
> Suggestions:
>
> 1) NEVER encrypt any file on your OP that exists somewhere unencrypted
> already. If it does, change the original (unzipped) file and add
> something or remove something, so that it is NOT IDENTICAL anymore to an
> unencrypted version. Note especially that avatars.dat, ALL sequences and
> ALL sounds are ALWAYS unencrypted in the cache folder of the AW browser,
> so encrypting any of these files is an open invitation to casual
> password-snatchers.
>
> 2) NEVER use short passwords (not here and not in any other
> environment), try to use whole sentences with words that are not in a
> dictionary and add some non-letter-non-digit characters.
>
> 3) As a developer, NEVER give out any files that are identical to the
> protected ones on your OP, always add or remove something from the
> original file before sending it to a buyer. Change the file name, too,
> to make it more difficult to obtain certain model names (to prevent easy
> downloading of big numbers of files from the OP).
>
> Comment:
>
> The near practical impossibility of (1) makes, in fact, all password
> attempts pointless, as does any public building with encrypted objects,
> as does any building with encrypted objects with citizens whom you do
> not trust 300+%.
>
> Additional risks include password retrieval from the network traffic
> and/or obtaining it from other flaws in the system.
>
> I'd classify the whole protection system of objects as low grade at
> maximum and generally not useable to ensure the protection of
> copyrighted material - and, as I have posted before, every developer
> should be (and is?) aware of that. And to add, I do not see any
> convenient or practical method of protection that cannot be overrun;
> there ARE safe methods, but they will impose a level of inconvenience
> and unpracticability that are not really justified for this environment.
> What good will it do when you can protect your material and nobody will
> see it anymore since nobody wants to bear the burdens of running the
> software then. And the same goes to sophisticaed methods of obscuring OP
> and objects names - remember, these things SHALL be downloaded, and
> everything that SHALL be downloaded, WILL be downloaded (whether in the
> right and lawful way, or not).
>
> The key here is to make people sensible and aware of the work involved
> in creating things - many, especially the worldowners of respected
> worlds, will pay the developers for designs they get, while there will
> always be a number of (mostly casual worldowners) who will leech them
> from whatever source and by whatever method. And there is no point in
> trying to pursue them either, due to the practical law and cost
> obstacles involved.
>
> My point is that business will continue as usual, designers build mainly
> for a handful of worldowners who buy their work (and are proud that they
> bought it, after all, it shows also style and class to their visitors),
> and some others (without style, class, and even not admired by more than
> a few even less capable pals of theirs) will continue to leech what they
> can get. C'est la vie - it won't destroy our hobby and it won't drive
> away developers, as long as these developers do not try to make a living
> out of their work, but see it as a nice, additional, not guaranteed,
> income.
|
Mar 15, 2004, 7:06pm
[View Quote]
> To give you all an impression how long it takes to decrypt a file or
> find a password, I give you some numbers.
>
> I post this since some people seem to think that the so-called "password
> crackers" are some higher beings with abilties not from this world -
> which they are not, it actually takes less of a brain that a script
> kiddy would need...
>
> This only applies to retrieving a password form a zip file when you have
> the file, it does NOT apply to obtaining a password in the course of
> transmission (eg. by listening to the server-client data exchange).
>
> What I needed:
>
> a) the zipped file - password protected
> b) the zipped file - without password
>
<snip excellent explanation>
MultiZip can rezip password protected files with new password AND it can change the content, so even if the perpetrator thinks he/she has one source file, the cracking will still fail.
Of course you don't want to password protect those files which Multizip can't change the content (like seqs, sounds) and never password the avatars.dat as XelaG advised correctly some posts ago.
--
Andras
"It's MY computer" (tm Steve Gibson)
Mar 15, 2004, 7:56pm
Yup, your tool is highly recommended! :-)
One thing to watch though - COB files cannot be changed by simply adding
something with a text editor, maybe you can come up with something
changing them too somehow... or developers should ALWAYS give out rwx
files only!
[View Quote]andras wrote:
>
> kf wrote:
>
>
> <snip excellent explanation>
> MultiZip can rezip password protected files with new password AND it can change the content, so even if the perpetrator thinks he/she has one source file, the cracking will still fail.
> Of course you don't want to password protect those files which Multizip can't change the content (like seqs, sounds) and never password the avatars.dat as XelaG advised correctly some posts ago.
>
> --
> Andras
> "It's MY computer" (tm Steve Gibson)
|
Mar 15, 2004, 7:57pm
Hello Mod,
I am not sure why you think we didn't go after M A T T. Everything we said
was and is true. The fact that people can get away with online crimes is
only a reflection that they can get away with real-life crimes also. We are
still taking action against M A T T but it takes a lot of time and if
certain law enforcement agencies do not act on our complaints, how can we
change it? I will not apologize for the judicial system of the United
States as I have control over it.
E
[View Quote]"mod" <mod at darkbirdie.com> wrote in message
news:4054785a$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Well here's the deal. The way AW protects OP PWs isn't bad, it is just
old.
> There first mistake was not really taking legal action against matt, and
> just saying they did. Remember the last list of op pws that went around.
> That was because of AWProxy 3.1 that was still floating around. After aw
> disabled use of the 3.2 browser that was solved, but now matt decided to
> release his AWProxy 3.4 that he stole from a certain someone. Now that,
that
> is floating around, no pw will be safe again. That fact of the matter is
> this 99% of people on aw wouldn't have the ability to decrypt op pws if
the
> encryption method wasn't practically public. What I don't understand is
back
> in the day when they changed the encryption method for cit pws why they
> didn't change it for op pws too...hmmm? So the solution is simple change
the
> encryption method and all pws will be safe, because those that can
actually
> get it again, certainly wouldn't be releasing any lists :)
>
> -Mod
> "lady nighthawk" <dmurtagh27 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:4054496a at server1.Activeworlds.com...
priority
I've
do
>
>
|
Mar 16, 2004, 3:20am
How can they go after him? He's a minor! Not sure they can do anything to
his parents either for that matter but that would be the place to persue,
perhaps enough pressure there and they'll make him stop?
LNH
[View Quote]"e n z o" <enzo at activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:405626e2$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Hello Mod,
>
> I am not sure why you think we didn't go after M A T T. Everything we
said
> was and is true. The fact that people can get away with online crimes is
> only a reflection that they can get away with real-life crimes also. We
are
> still taking action against M A T T but it takes a lot of time and if
> certain law enforcement agencies do not act on our complaints, how can we
> change it? I will not apologize for the judicial system of the United
> States as I have control over it.
>
> E
>
>
> "mod" <mod at darkbirdie.com> wrote in message
> news:4054785a$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> old.
> that
> the
> back
> the
> actually
> priority
> I've
> do
>
>
|
Mar 16, 2004, 4:25am
[View Quote]lady nighthawk wrote:
> How can they go after him? He's a minor! Not sure they can do anything to
> his parents either for that matter but that would be the place to persue,
> perhaps enough pressure there and they'll make him stop?
|
Age can't be used as a defense for everything. He _knew_ what he was
doing was wrong. Therefore he is guilt of a crime and should be punished.
These types of crimes need knowledge of what you're doing, so, it's not
really hard to point a finger and put a punishment. It won't be jail or
death, but it might be pretty severe (wage garnishment to pay back greif
and such, mental assessment in a juivinile detention center).
I have no sympathy for children who play with fire and get burnt. It
seems some courts agree, and some do not.
Mar 16, 2004, 9:21am
Juvinile hall is full of minors :) That would be a good place to start.
:-)
[View Quote]"lady nighthawk" <dmurtagh27 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:40568e91 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> How can they go after him? He's a minor! Not sure they can do anything to
> his parents either for that matter but that would be the place to persue,
> perhaps enough pressure there and they'll make him stop?
>
> LNH
>
>
>
> "e n z o" <enzo at activeworlds.com> wrote in message
> news:405626e2$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> said
is
> are
we
and
around.
aw
to
that,
is
if
is
they
change
to
you
>
>
|
Mar 16, 2004, 9:24am
I agree, they still need to be accountable for their crimes.
[View Quote]"bowen" <newoB at sardna.ten> wrote in message
news:40569df1$2 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> lady nighthawk wrote:
to
persue,
>
> Age can't be used as a defense for everything. He _knew_ what he was
> doing was wrong. Therefore he is guilt of a crime and should be punished.
>
> These types of crimes need knowledge of what you're doing, so, it's not
> really hard to point a finger and put a punishment. It won't be jail or
> death, but it might be pretty severe (wage garnishment to pay back greif
> and such, mental assessment in a juivinile detention center).
>
> I have no sympathy for children who play with fire and get burnt. It
> seems some courts agree, and some do not.
|
Mar 16, 2004, 11:51am
My father keeps calling me a minor when hes writing his will although I've
never been... ok thats not true... down a mine in my life... i've been down
a mine on a guided tour :-P
~John
[View Quote]"ciena" <nikona at comcast.net> wrote in message
news:4056e350$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Juvinile hall is full of minors :) That would be a good place to start.
> :-)
> "lady nighthawk" <dmurtagh27 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:40568e91 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
to
persue,
crimes
> is
We
> we
United
just
> and
> around.
After
> aw
decided
> to
> that,
matter
> is
> if
> is
> they
> change
> to
it,
> you
>
>
|
Mar 16, 2004, 1:25pm
there's a difference between a minor and a 'juvinile deliquent'.and parents
should take responsiblity and action on their difiant teen whereas
johnf just causes grief with his goofy jokes =P j/k !
[View Quote]"johnf" <johnf at 3d-reality.com.no-spam-please> wrote in message
news:4057065c at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> My father keeps calling me a minor when hes writing his will although I've
> never been... ok thats not true... down a mine in my life... i've been
down
> a mine on a guided tour :-P
>
> ~John
>
> "ciena" <nikona at comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:4056e350$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> to
> persue,
we
> crimes
> We
if
can
> United
> just
matt,
> After
> decided
> matter
pws
understand
way
#1
> it,
Can't
>
>
|
Mar 16, 2004, 3:06pm
Unfortunately he seems to have a CLOSE relative that is in the legal field.
So far he seems to have avoided his court date and it looks like the local
"law enforcement", A. "can't find him" B. "nope never heard of him" C.
"no sir he's not in that schoolhouse I reckon" D. "no sir that boah is a
good boah and wern't never in no virtualllll world herassin folks" (all
air quotes I am sure ;). Of course this should come as no real surprise
when you think how long it takes to get REAL terrorists even with the entire
US military looking for them.
In any case we are still working with our police up here and putting a case
together. Since parents are liable for the acts of their children at some
point we may have to go after his CLOSE relative. If you have monetary
claims against him keep sending them. I am sure at some point his mommy will
get nervous and pull his little plug.
Seems illegal to me to knowingly ignore the US Judicial system, but what do
I know ?
Keep sending your emails to abuse at activeworlds.com
Sorry for the delay... your tax dollars at work.
E
E. ya might rabbit, ya might ...
[View Quote]"casey n qrv o" <caseyangel_usa at yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:40571c6d at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> there's a difference between a minor and a 'juvinile deliquent'.and
parents
> should take responsiblity and action on their difiant teen whereas
> johnf just causes grief with his goofy jokes =P j/k !
> "johnf" <johnf at 3d-reality.com.no-spam-please> wrote in message
> news:4057065c at server1.Activeworlds.com...
I've
> down
start.
anything
Everything
> we
also.
> if
> can
is
> matt,
Now
> pws
> understand
why
simple
can
> way
> #1
using
the
> Can't
>
>
|
Mar 16, 2004, 4:46pm
hhmmmm maybe we should all send the police there letters.
[View Quote]"e n z o" <enzo at activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:40573417$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
> Unfortunately he seems to have a CLOSE relative that is in the legal
field.
> So far he seems to have avoided his court date and it looks like the local
> "law enforcement", A. "can't find him" B. "nope never heard of him"
C.
> "no sir he's not in that schoolhouse I reckon" D. "no sir that boah is
a
> good boah and wern't never in no virtualllll world herassin folks" (all
> air quotes I am sure ;). Of course this should come as no real surprise
> when you think how long it takes to get REAL terrorists even with the
entire
> US military looking for them.
>
> In any case we are still working with our police up here and putting a
case
> together. Since parents are liable for the acts of their children at some
> point we may have to go after his CLOSE relative. If you have monetary
> claims against him keep sending them. I am sure at some point his mommy
will
> get nervous and pull his little plug.
>
> Seems illegal to me to knowingly ignore the US Judicial system, but what
do
> I know ?
>
> Keep sending your emails to abuse at activeworlds.com
>
>
> Sorry for the delay... your tax dollars at work.
>
>
> E
>
>
> E. ya might rabbit, ya might ...
> "casey n qrv o" <caseyangel_usa at yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:40571c6d at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> parents
> I've
> start.
> anything
> Everything
> also.
and
how
> is
went
around.
> Now
op
> why
> simple
> can
no
your
> using
> the
>
>
|
Mar 16, 2004, 5:05pm
Enzo, I also rcvd an E-Mail from said Christopher Stevens, and the last
one I sent to the FBI and included the fact this person is a hacker and
virul writer. Hopes that they find exactly what was said too. If nothing
else but a hacker trying to steal sensative information, which is a
federal offense anyway.
[View Quote]"e n z o" <enzo at activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:405626e2$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
: Hello Mod,
:
: I am not sure why you think we didn't go after M A T T. Everything we
said
: was and is true. The fact that people can get away with online
crimes is
: only a reflection that they can get away with real-life crimes also.
We are
: still taking action against M A T T but it takes a lot of time and if
: certain law enforcement agencies do not act on our complaints, how can
we
: change it? I will not apologize for the judicial system of the
United
: States as I have control over it.
:
: E
:
:
: "mod" <mod at darkbirdie.com> wrote in message
: news:4054785a$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
: > Well here's the deal. The way AW protects OP PWs isn't bad, it is
just
: old.
: > There first mistake was not really taking legal action against matt,
and
: > just saying they did. Remember the last list of op pws that went
around.
: > That was because of AWProxy 3.1 that was still floating around.
After aw
: > disabled use of the 3.2 browser that was solved, but now matt
decided to
: > release his AWProxy 3.4 that he stole from a certain someone. Now
that,
: that
: > is floating around, no pw will be safe again. That fact of the
matter is
: > this 99% of people on aw wouldn't have the ability to decrypt op pws
if
: the
: > encryption method wasn't practically public. What I don't understand
is
: back
: > in the day when they changed the encryption method for cit pws why
they
: > didn't change it for op pws too...hmmm? So the solution is simple
change
: the
: > encryption method and all pws will be safe, because those that can
: actually
: > get it again, certainly wouldn't be releasing any lists :)
: >
: > -Mod
: > "lady nighthawk" <dmurtagh27 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
: > news:4054496a at server1.Activeworlds.com...
: > > AWI ... what is so hard about pw protecting an op? Is there no way
to
: > > protect items we've paid for? I would think this would be your #1
: priority
: > > no? I mean the truth is, I already *paid for stuff* and am using
it,
: I've
: > > done my part by attempting to pw protect them but truly it's the
: > > model/object creators that are getting burned here isn't it? Can't
you
: do
: > > something about it?
: > >
: > > Inquiring minds wanna know...
: > >
: > > LNH <<< *doesn't get it*
: > >
: > >
: > >
: > >
: > >
: > >
: > >
: >
: >
:
:
|
Mar 16, 2004, 5:33pm
Geez it's your software and you don't have to sell him a cit and he has to
pay by credit card or check so you have personal info so why don't you
cancel his account(s) and not sell him any more?
There is no law that says you have to sell a cit to anyone who wants one.
Paul
[View Quote]"e n z o" <enzo at activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:40573417$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
> Unfortunately he seems to have a CLOSE relative that is in the legal
field.
> So far he seems to have avoided his court date and it looks like the local
> "law enforcement", A. "can't find him" B. "nope never heard of him"
C.
> "no sir he's not in that schoolhouse I reckon" D. "no sir that boah is
a
> good boah and wern't never in no virtualllll world herassin folks" (all
> air quotes I am sure ;). Of course this should come as no real surprise
> when you think how long it takes to get REAL terrorists even with the
entire
> US military looking for them.
>
> In any case we are still working with our police up here and putting a
case
> together. Since parents are liable for the acts of their children at some
> point we may have to go after his CLOSE relative. If you have monetary
> claims against him keep sending them. I am sure at some point his mommy
will
> get nervous and pull his little plug.
>
> Seems illegal to me to knowingly ignore the US Judicial system, but what
do
> I know ?
>
> Keep sending your emails to abuse at activeworlds.com
>
>
> Sorry for the delay... your tax dollars at work.
>
>
> E
>
>
> E. ya might rabbit, ya might ...
> "casey n qrv o" <caseyangel_usa at yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:40571c6d at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> parents
> I've
> start.
> anything
> Everything
> also.
and
how
> is
went
around.
> Now
op
> why
> simple
> can
no
your
> using
> the
>
>
|
Mar 16, 2004, 7:01pm
[View Quote]paul wrote:
> Geez it's your software and you don't have to sell him a cit and he has to
> pay by credit card or check so you have personal info so why don't you
> cancel his account(s) and not sell him any more?
> There is no law that says you have to sell a cit to anyone who wants one.
|
Stolen accounts.
Mar 16, 2004, 7:41pm
I agree! but he can easily get around that.he can give the money to an evil
buddy of his to purchase a cit for him. then give him the name and pw.
[View Quote]"paul" <mpbarrow at NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:405756a6$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Geez it's your software and you don't have to sell him a cit and he has
to
> pay by credit card or check so you have personal info so why don't you
> cancel his account(s) and not sell him any more?
> There is no law that says you have to sell a cit to anyone who wants one.
>
> Paul
>
> "e n z o" <enzo at activeworlds.com> wrote in message
> news:40573417$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> field.
local
> C.
is
> a
(all
> entire
> case
some
> will
what
> do
whereas
although
been
to
online
> and
> how
the
it
against
> went
> around.
matt
someone.
the
decrypt
> op
pws
that
there
> no
> your
it's
it?
>
>
|
Mar 21, 2004, 8:42am
Paul - heard of CC Fraud?
~John
[View Quote]"paul" <mpbarrow at NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:405756a6$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Geez it's your software and you don't have to sell him a cit and he has
to
> pay by credit card or check so you have personal info so why don't you
> cancel his account(s) and not sell him any more?
> There is no law that says you have to sell a cit to anyone who wants one.
>
> Paul
>
> "e n z o" <enzo at activeworlds.com> wrote in message
> news:40573417$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> field.
local
> C.
is
> a
(all
> entire
> case
some
> will
what
> do
whereas
although
been
to
online
> and
> how
the
it
against
> went
> around.
matt
someone.
the
decrypt
> op
pws
that
there
> no
> your
it's
it?
>
>
|
Mar 21, 2004, 4:44pm
So you are saying that OP owners should NOT have identical data in their
protected files?
Maybe there could be a tool to add a little random comment at the end of
rwx or cob files, if it's possible to comment those, or to add a line
that does nothing, if that's possible. That way, there would be no
unprotected file to compare it with!
[View Quote]
> Passwords (or encryption elements) are relatively easy to obtain when
> you have identical data in protected and unprotected files.
>
>
>
[View Quote]> alexthemartian wrote:
>
|
Mar 22, 2004, 4:22pm
Yer know... the easiest way to do this would be to use a new compression /
encryption method one way.... and have only the browser know the decrypt
method...
- MR
[View Quote]"lady nighthawk" <dmurtagh27 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4054496a at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> AWI ... what is so hard about pw protecting an op? Is there no way to
> protect items we've paid for? I would think this would be your #1 priority
> no? I mean the truth is, I already *paid for stuff* and am using it, I've
> done my part by attempting to pw protect them but truly it's the
> model/object creators that are getting burned here isn't it? Can't you do
> something about it?
>
> Inquiring minds wanna know...
>
> LNH <<< *doesn't get it*
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
|
Mar 22, 2004, 7:26pm
[View Quote]E N Z O wrote: So far he seems to have avoided his court date.
|
Casey has sent me her theory on it:
After numerous rounds of "We don't even know if he is in our area" ...the
good boah decided to send the local law enforcements an email to let them
know that he is still in the game. They opened the letter and it appeared to
contain a coded message:
370HSSV-0773H
The local law enforcements couldn't figure it out so they forwarded it to
CIA. They had no clue either so they forwarded it to the NSA. No one could
solve it so it went to MIT and NASA and the cc list just got longer and
longer. Eventually it arrived at the Feds.
Dr Greenspan looked at it and replied immediately: "Perhaps the local law
enforcements there would wish to look at the message up-side-down..."
QRVnCasey o
Mar 22, 2004, 8:06pm
volgende keer wel effe eerst vragen, hè? =p
"qrvncasey o" <qrv at geocities.com> wrote .....
Mar 22, 2004, 11:18pm
hahaha
<<< gets it!
LNH
[View Quote]"qrvncasey o" <qrv at geocities.com> wrote in message
news:405f59f8$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> E N Z O wrote: So far he seems to have avoided his court date.
>
> Casey has sent me her theory on it:
>
>
> After numerous rounds of "We don't even know if he is in our area" ...the
> good boah decided to send the local law enforcements an email to let them
> know that he is still in the game. They opened the letter and it appeared
to
> contain a coded message:
>
> 370HSSV-0773H
>
> The local law enforcements couldn't figure it out so they forwarded it to
> CIA. They had no clue either so they forwarded it to the NSA. No one could
> solve it so it went to MIT and NASA and the cc list just got longer and
> longer. Eventually it arrived at the Feds.
>
> Dr Greenspan looked at it and replied immediately: "Perhaps the local law
> enforcements there would wish to look at the message up-side-down..."
>
>
>
> QRVnCasey o
>
>
|
Mar 23, 2004, 1:25am
[View Quote]
[View Quote]> E N Z O wrote: So far he seems to have avoided his court date.
>
> Casey has sent me her theory on it:
>
>
> After numerous rounds of "We don't even know if he is in our area" ...the
> good boah decided to send the local law enforcements an email to let them
> know that he is still in the game. They opened the letter and it appeared to
> contain a coded message:
>
> 370HSSV-0773H
>
> The local law enforcements couldn't figure it out so they forwarded it to
> CIA. They had no clue either so they forwarded it to the NSA. No one could
> solve it so it went to MIT and NASA and the cc list just got longer and
> longer. Eventually it arrived at the Feds.
>
> Dr Greenspan looked at it and replied immediately: "Perhaps the local law
> enforcements there would wish to look at the message up-side-down..."
|
FBI = feds?
|