ThreadBoard ArchivesSite FeaturesActiveworlds SupportHistoric Archives |
AW & Revenue (Community)
AW & Revenue // CommunitykfApr 9, 2003, 7:57pm
[View Quote]
On the other hand, AW is most likely playing "catch up" with newer start
ups like Plastic Planet and Cyboria who have recently sailed past the AW browser in technology and features - many of which are from the AW Wishlist and were incorporated where AW did not. <<< I agree. Cyboria, for example demonstrate their forseeing future vison, extraordinary efforts and innovative technology on their website: http://www.cyboria.com/ Cyboria has closed. The project was fun while it lasted but the costs to create the software more than twice exceeded what the software was bringing in. I may release the source code so that the venture may continue under some type of open source project. Check back later for my decision on this matter. My personal opinion is that all 3D VR Applications are going under. The only survivors that will lead the market are http://www.there.com and http://www.thesimsonline.com I personally will be using both of the above mentioned sites and have been beta testing both for a while now. Once you see what these systems have to offer, you will probably agree with my opinion of how they are going to take over the markets completely. So much more is available in these new software packages. The market is in for big changes. To those that supported Cyboria, I am grateful. Once we review the source code for the possibility of an Open Source release, we may put the main server back online, with all original citizenships still intact. Thanks, Cyboria Development Team <<< sw comitApr 10, 2003, 3:23pm
e n z oApr 15, 2003, 2:08pm
LOL,
You know the statement about what happens when you assume? a. AW Inc. did not get delisted for poor earnings and I do not speak for AW Corp. AW Inc. has always been a seperate entity from AWC. A majority of the Board of Directors of AWC wished to pursue other business models which were not approved by a majority of shareholders or management, this created a split which was not positive toward either the shareholders or the operating business. There is also a much higher cost to maintaining a public entity than a similar sized private company. The solution to the split in opinion was to take AWI private while allowing AWC to pursue other options. b. AWI is not in financial decline. We have cut costs in several non profitable areas as have many tech companies. We have had a positive cash flow and a profit each quarter since the split. We spend significant amounts on R&D and support. c. The pricing of AW is not out of line - and is often substantially lower than other 3D online ventures (some of which are operating under heavy losses). AWI prices according to the cost it takes to run. d. We are not "playing catch up" with the technologies you mention. We continue to advance the same software we have been working on and improving since 1995. Any examination of any 3D community/internet software will show both flaws and superiorities when compared. Although I have seen some other cool stuff, I stand by AW. e. Double edged sword? Not keeping up with the competition? Slacking? Please! f. This is a much straighter answer than a sum up from someone who makes many unsupported suppositions I think that this is fair answer and gives you much more information about the business operation of AWI than you are likely to get from any private business owner you might run across. E [View Quote] panther1403Apr 19, 2003, 4:06pm
man the threads in this news group just keep going and going and going and
going..... |