|
|
devon tuck // User Search
devon tuck // User Search
Oct 1, 1998, 5:26pm
Funny, I just stumbled across this yesterday. So as Roland said,
the following code will work:
void handle_chat (void)
{
/*
printf ("chat: Session %d %s %s NAME: %s\n", aw_int (AW_CHAT_SESSION),
chat_type[aw_int (AW_CHAT_TYPE)], aw_string (AW_CHAT_MESSAGE), aw_string
(AW_AVATAR_NAME));
*/
printf ("%s:\t\t%s\n", aw_string (AW_AVATAR_NAME),
aw_string (AW_CHAT_MESSAGE));
}
Interesting to note that when I tried to use AW_AVATAR_NAME
within a handle_avatar_delete I got a blank string.
Devon
[View Quote]
[View Quote]> Cyborganic wrote in message <36007317.0 at homer>...
> seems
>
> The session number in AW_AVATAR_SESSION during the AVATAR_ADD event is the
> same as the session number in AW_CHAT_SESSION during an AVATAR_CHAT event
> for that avatar . I guess the confusing part is that the two different
> events use two different attributes to convey the session number.
>
> current
> it
>
> The behavior you describe here sounds like a pre-build 5 version of the SDK.
> If you are using the DLL from build 5, then the AW_AVATAR_NAME attribute
> should be correctly defined for the events AW_EVENT_AVATAR_DELETE,
> AW_EVENT_AVATAR_CHANGE, and AW_EVENT_CHAT.
>
> -Roland
|
Oct 3, 1998, 11:01am
Haha. I can't resist the line from the movie Rainman here:
"Are you taking any prescription medication?"
Devon
[View Quote]grover wrote:
>
> I've been hearing feedback of the sort that the SDK isn't impossible to learn.
> That most of the bugs have workarounds, and that nearly anyone with a C
> compiler has created a bot. This is clearly not efficient! I think you should
> scrap it, and write it for the accountants, not the users, like the software we
> have to use at work. That way, you get to teach a boring 2-day course, just
> like we had to sit through today, cos they scrapped the current system for one
> that is twice as complex, completely ridiculous to operate, but keeps track of
> every single nut and bolt! see... i think the theory is, "why should we give
> the user a simple NT-based text box and <search> button, when instead we can
> force him to open an telnet-esque interface screen and manually type in three
> different filters before searching for a part number?"
>
> grover
>
> grover
>
> Roland Vilett wrote:
>
|
Oct 3, 1998, 12:26pm
I went looking and found "Web Downloader" which is I
think what Edward is suggesting.
WebDownloader Home Page:
http://www.saransk.sitek.net/pages/arny/
Another application that is very well known to do the
job of downloading whole web sites is Web Whacker:
http://www.ffg.com/whacker.html
Enjoy,
Devon
[View Quote]Edward Sumerfield wrote:
>
> You might try going to www.winfiles.com at the internet utilities section.
> There is a freeware program there called "webdown". Just point it at a web
> site and it will download a set of pages and images to your local drive. It
> makes all the appropriate link fixes so that you can work offline.
>
> Edward Sumerfield.
>
> Magine wrote in message <361aa004.9853426 at news.activeworlds.com>...
|
Oct 5, 1998, 4:30am
Well because of Roland's suggestion I just tried Web Downloader:
http://www.saransk.sitek.net/pages/arny/wd.htm
And my god it works beautifully!
*sluurrrp* and it's all on your local drive.
Have fun,
Devon
[View Quote]Roland Vilett wrote:
>
> Maybe at some point in the future, but currently the SDK documentation is
> still changing too much for it to make sense to distribute an offline
> version.
>
> -Roland
>
> Magine wrote in message <361aa004.9853426 at news.activeworlds.com>...
|
|
