1  ...  15  16  17  18  19  20  ...  26  |   Order by default

Jul 17, 2004, 6:21am

Considering there are already banner ads at the GZs, does that mean some
people are paying that amount of money? O_O Or.. is it just a lost pricing
plan?

Jul 25, 2004, 6:13am

Hu, news flash. You are on Active Worlds' private turf right now, and they
have the right to impose whatever views they have on you. Freedom of speech
does not force private organizations to allow customers to talk about
anything they want. I'm sorry if that bursts your bubble.
[View Quote]

Jul 30, 2004, 6:10am

You got defensive when .sharon said something bad about you. Then you
started talking about how people resort to attacking other members.

Quote from Hu:
" I will not sink into name-calling and threats as you have done because I
realize that this situation is equally painful for us all and you don't need
to be dealing with the trivialities of flame-wars with me"

Now, you laugh about someone wishing someone else to die.

Quote from Hu:
"BWW HAA HA HA HA HA!!!!"

You are such a flip-flopper. Kerry deserves your vote. :P

Jul 30, 2004, 6:12am

Duh, because he's the same guy who thinks Osama Bin Laden is great and that
all Americans should die. He just wants to stir things up. I can't imagine
anyone being stupid enough to seriously say the things that Weyoun/Commander
Sisko has said. Take everything he says as a grain of salt.

Jul 23, 2004, 9:24am

I thought they removed general.discussion in hopes that spam like this
wouldn't be posted. :P At least they tried.

Jul 26, 2004, 6:09pm

Hmm, you're not attacking "Butcher Bush and his cronies"? (to quote you) :P

Jul 28, 2004, 3:38am

"Almost everything" is a lot of stuff. Please list everything he was wrong
on

Okay, let me start the list for you.
1: He was wrong on the weapons of mass destruction, but acted on evidence
that MI6, Russian Intelligence, and the CIA had.

Jul 30, 2004, 5:56am

"Taliban is an organisation who was sponsored and made powefull by for
example USA."

Despite the U.S. killing three-fourths of their members? Okay.

Sponsored? Prove it.

Jul 30, 2004, 6:05am

"The Butchers Bush and Blair"
"Butcher Bush"
"Bush ... is overtly an EVIL man."
"His Nazi approach"
"his mentor Hitler"

Yet...

"and I'm not even attacking Bush."

You're waffling like Kerry now! ;)







"with the super modern spy satellites, heat seeking devices, and other
gadgetry the US now possess they can find anything they want to find even on
the moons of neighboring planets"

To say that is to say that the most advanced instruments in the world only
exist to give faulty evidence that support's some certain person's theory.
If the US *really* wanted to convince people that there was, for instance,
dirty laundry on Europa, they should be doing everything *but* use advanced
technology. :P

Jul 30, 2004, 7:57pm

Communism was the evil empire back in the 1980s. The US was doing anything
it could to end communism, and through Reagan's efforts, communism in Russia
fell. The United States had no way of knowing the Taliban would turn out
the way it is now. Now, the United States does know what the Taliban is up
to, and they are not giving them a dime. :P

Jul 31, 2004, 1:26am

"Yes but they are not dealing with them either - Bush says he wants to end
the terrorist threat then goes into Iraq with not solid evidence that it is
warranted taking away the US military's forceful presence from Afghanistan
and his buddy Osama."

Not solid evidence? It's funny. The liberals criticize Bush for not
acting on evidence before 9/11 happened, but now the liberals criticize Bush
for acting on the same type of evidence! Make up your minds :P

"It is quite evident that Bush is his daddy's puppet and that the Bush
family is in bed with the Bin Laden's... It is disgusting!"

Yeah, that is just rhetorical nonsense. Unless you have any proof of
that, it's best you keep your mouth shut. :P

"American boys are chess pieces in a political war that is designed to take
the attention off the Bin Laden/Bush family connection."

The Bin Laden/Bush family connection. Is that what you like to call it?
Do you have any proof that both families have strong connections? Oh, and
don't reference Michael Moore's film. That's just twisted propaganda that
even John Kerry has the sense to keep out of his campaign. :P

"Go see Michael Moore's film Fahrenheit 9/11, it's plainly stated there and
I do not see the Bush family denying it or suing Moore for slander."

Read previous statement, and Bush isn't suing that nutty socialist
because Moore's not worth his time.

If you still don't understand how nutty that statement of yours is, let
me give you an example.

If I were to say that you were a neo-nazi, and spread it around Active
Worlds, would you waste your time suing me? Probably not.
Then, I would say "See, Hu's not suing me, that must mean everything I
say is true!"
Now, that would be rediculous of me to do.

"WAKE UP AMERICANS You are being made fools of by an evil family that kills
your kids to cover their sinister tracks!"

How is killing supposed to cover up sinister tracks? Why isn't John Kerry
saying anything you are saying? :P Maybe because it's blatantly false.

Jul 31, 2004, 4:14pm

"Funny, you demand proof of everything and when someone tries to give it to
you, you refuse to listen.
At the same time when one ask for proof for mass destruction weapons in Iraq
or connection between Saddam and Al-Quaid, one is supposed to belive they
excist without any proof."

Guess what, you might be surprised to know that I never believed there
was any proof of existance of WMDs. I believe that the evidence was
erroneous. And, Hu never tried to give me any proof of anything ;) he was
just ranting.

"One would belive that history would teach not to mess with things that one
have no business messing with."

Like dealing with the Nazi forces in World War 2? I believe that taught
the opposite of what you're trying to get at.

"And now this stupid war again. I wonder if people will ever learn to mind
their own business and play their wargames at home if they want to."

Would have you sat back and minded your own business when the Nazi
forces were rounding up millions of people and slaughtering them? Some
people realize that there are definite wrongs in the world and they are not
afraid to deal with them.


"Not so nice to pick randomly a weak country far away and go there and cause
destruction."

In no way was Iraq randomely picked. There was a malicious dictator who
killed hundreds of thousands of people there. That was a problem to deal
with.


"What the current govermant has done, it will take a long time to heal."

Yes, I agree with you there. It will take a long time for Iraq to heal
after the hard times it's been through.


"Never before has USA been so hated worldwide ( along with all other western
countries)."

That's what happens when you have people watching things like Al-jazeera
and Sky news.

"Never has it been so easy for terrorist groups to get new memebers."

I'd like to see some proof of that statement of yours.

"What Bush has done has been a lottery winning to Al-Quaida and similar
organisations."

Yeah, the terrorists love having Saddam Hussein and Osama Bin Laden out
of power.

"You really should stop that Man now, before the entire world is in war"

So, what do you predict will happen in the future? Which countries will
be involved in the war, and what sides will they be on? I'm just curious.

"The war CAN be taken to your land, because they do not attack with big
troops nor tanks."

That's already happened, and that's why we're at war, to prevent it from
happening again. I don't see the numbers of terrorists increasing during
the war. :P

Hey, Hu, here's a question for you.
What do you think about this statement?
"[We] gave Saddam a chance, not a license. If we turn our backs on his
defiance, the credibility of U.S. power as a check against Saddam will be
destroyed. We will not only have allowed Saddam to shatter the inspection
system that controls his weapons of mass destruction; we will also have
fatally undercut the fear of force that stops Saddam from acting to gain
domination of the region."

Jul 31, 2004, 4:37pm

Hmm, Hu, I don't believe I was attacking you. ;) I have countered every
statement you've made without personally attacking you.

Jul 31, 2004, 7:01pm

So, you call a good argument a subtle attack? I don't believe I was
attacking you at all when I made those statements. Please state
specifically the attacks I made (with quotes). Then I will apologize for
making those attacks, if that's what they indeed are. ;)

Aug 1, 2004, 1:53am

Okay Hu, .Sharon might have been quite harsh (I wouldn't have been as
harsh), but she does have a point. You come in here ranting about
something, then I come in here and counter every argument you've made, and
you choose to ignore me, saying that I am supposedly "attacking" you in some
type of "subtle" way.
Stand up for what you believe! Isn't that what you want to do? Surely
you didn't come in these NGs expecting everyone to agree with you.

Aug 1, 2004, 7:19am

"We really have nothing but Kerry's word that he will re-establish good
relations with the allies that Bush has alienated and that he will only go
to war as an absolute last resort. I would put my money on Kerry though for
a future with at least a margin of world security, it will take time though
for America to convince the world community that it can be trusted again."

Hu, what do you think of these quotes?

"Saddam Hussein has already used these weapons and has made it clear that he
has the intent to continue to try, by virtue of his duplicity and secrecy,
to continue to do so. That is a threat to the stability of the Middle East.
It is a threat with respect to the potential of terrorist activities on a
global basis. It is a threat even to regions near but not exactly in the
Middle East."

"We urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S.
Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate,
air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to
the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction
programs."

"If Saddam Hussein is unwilling to bend to the international community's
already existing order, then he will have invited enforcement, even if that
enforcement is mostly at the hands of the United States, a right we retain
even if the Security Council fails to act."


"If Fox News says they are "Fair and Balanced" even once they are liars."

Every news station has some sort of lean just about. BBC has a very
good record.

Hu, do you think CNN has any sort of bias? What about the New York Times?


"Not familiar enough with [Kerry's senate record] yet to answer this!"

You really should familiarize yourself with it.

"I'm sure Bush would love it if they would; he needs the terrorists to
assist him in terrorizing the American people into voting for him. I would
not be surprised if he and his cronies set up some kind of terrorist plot
that can't be traced like the anthrax scares to sway the people through fear
to vote for him."

Are you saying that Bush is behind the anthrax letters? I think it is
stooping very low to say that Bush coordinates attacks with terrorists.
What source are you getting this from? Fahrenheit 9/11?

"I don't care about Bin Laden."

Even after it was proven that he organized the attacks against the United
States, killing thousands of people?

"It is obvious that the perpetrators of the illegal war on Iraq should be
held responsible for their lies and deceit. Bush and that UK twit!"

Bush never lied about the war. He followed evidence that Russian
Intelligence, MI6, and the CIA had. Everyone was in agreement about the
WMDs, even clinton, who frequently conducted air strikes in the Iraqi no-fly
zones.

Jul 24, 2004, 5:49am

Wow, you're really digging deep, lol.
[View Quote]

Jul 25, 2004, 6:18am

I posted that :D I thought it was hilarious.
[View Quote]

Aug 3, 2004, 12:00am

What's Hu going on about this time? :P

Jul 25, 2004, 8:56pm

Does this memorial build include the million people Saddam killed?

Jul 30, 2004, 6:19am

Take the things Weyoun/Commander Sisko says as a grain of salt. He just
wants to stir things up.

Jul 31, 2004, 4:39pm

I doubt he was trying to be funny as much as he wanted to make people mad.
I believe Rossyboy was the one who made the sensible post telling everyone
to ignore Weyoun/Commander Sisko

Jul 28, 2004, 6:16am

O_O You mean this wasn't serious? Ugh, thanks a lot. Now I have to unpack
again.

Jul 28, 2004, 3:40am

You want the error message to say "Blimey!" instead of "Holy crap!"?

Jul 31, 2004, 5:54am

I don't see how one could possibly impliment an interface that would mute
advertisements, much less lyrics. This whole thread sounds more like a
rant. :P

Jul 31, 2004, 5:54am

Oh, wait, it is a rant. The "Wishlist" title threw me off. >_<

Aug 1, 2004, 4:49pm

Yeah, I can't get through either.

Aug 10, 2004, 2:26am

I think Rossyboy's right. He is anti-Bush, but is reasonable about it. Hu,
I bet if you got a cavity you would blame it on Bush. Seriously, have you
ever tried listening to the news or something? You seem to be more
anti-Bush than you know about Bush.

Aug 11, 2004, 3:28am

And I'm still waiting for you to quote me on where I attacked you.

Aug 11, 2004, 3:34am

It's interesting that Hu likes saying that someone is attacking him if they
make very valid points to a discussion, yet Hu fails to look back on all the
times he's insulted people.

Let me list a few.

"your life must be very tiny and meaningless"
"small brain"
"little minded friend"
"obvious lack of maturity"
" old politician that has become seedy and distrustful"

And much more...

Hu, I think you should stop freaking out if someone is trying to "assasinate
your character." It seems that you are just projecting yourself on others.

1  ...  15  16  17  18  19  20  ...  26  |   Order by default