|
|
lady nighthawk // User Search
lady nighthawk // User Search
Dec 13, 2004, 9:34pm
Thanks for the info KSG!
LNH
--
[View Quote]"king small guy" <kingsmallguy at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:41be303f at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Dialup Btopenworld (BT Yahoo!)
>
> My isp is the same but in not "Living in the ninetees"
>
> as far as i rember the ipaddress is not static and range changes every few
> weeks
>
> "lady nighthawk" <dmurtagh27 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:41be26a4$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> :o/
> AFTER
> world
> their
> their
changed
> was
> path!
bold
> used
> to
> and
and
tourist...
> NightHawk
> 0.01a
> without
>
>
|
Dec 14, 2004, 6:16pm
I'm off, hubby's in *limbo land* :o/
LNH
--
[View Quote]"swe" <swe at swehli.com> wrote in message
news:41bf4721 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Did the activeworlds server go down for anyone else? suddenly went poof
> about 5 minutes, and haven't been able to relogin since. anyone else
having
> that problem, or is my connection screwed?
>
> -SWE
>
>
|
Dec 14, 2004, 8:44pm
Iaura, I was wrong to jump to conclusions and I am very sorry if you've
receive any *upsetting grams* or email as a result. This was not your fault
and I apologize to you and your friends. I wanted to say this publically so
that if anyone has sent you *upsetting grams* they will retract them.
The "tourist" however, should be ashamed of himself for being so childish.
And as for me, I should have contacted you directly FIRST rather than AWI,
etc ... again, I am sorry!
Thank you to Andras, Heu and Strike Rapier for helping me, you know why.
Hugzzz
Lady NightHawk
--
Dec 16, 2004, 5:14am
OK I've gotta ask ya Rossy ... and I'm neither for or against, I think to
each their own ... since you are in a roll playing world of *Medieval Times*
theme ... well, gays weren't *out* at that time, this didn't occur until the
1980s or so ... I believe that in Medieval Times if you were discovered
you'd have been burned at the stake or something primitive like that.
I agree this should not be happening in this day and age, and I understand
to some small degree the struggles ensuing, but considering that awrpg is
themed on medieval times I think you need to act accordingly. Maybe do some
research on homosexuality in that day and age and if you can prove it was
(at that time acceptible), perhaps the CTs of awrpg would then reconsider?
Just some thoughts...
LNH
--
[View Quote]"rossyboy" <rossyboy at vwtv.org> wrote in message
news:41c103b1$2 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
|
> I've been told on multiple occassions by promient AWRPG players that the
> reason is that AWRPG is based on medieval times.
Dec 16, 2004, 6:35am
I'm not an rpg'r so I wasn't aware, but I'd think if it were fashioned after
medieval times and that's it's theme then it should be that way for all
regardless. However, doing it strictly by the medieval book would be
somewhat complicated in this day and age I'd think. All I can say is better
them (CTs) than me, I can't imagine going *backwards in time* ... maybe
that's why I'm not a roll player. I hope it gets resolved!
LNH
--
[View Quote]"ferruccio" <startrek3 at earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:41c15280$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> You ignored Rossyboy's point that women are given equal rights in AWRPG,
> when they did not have equal rights in medieval times.
>
> "lady nighthawk" <dmurtagh27 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:41c143fd at server1.Activeworlds.com...
to
understand
is
was
reconsider?
the
>
>
|
Dec 23, 2004, 8:54pm
Do it sweety, just do it! Those that know ya know you rock at makin stuff!
Luv n hugzzz and happy holidays! Sure wish I had 1/2 your talent :o/
LNH
--
[View Quote]"imagine" <imagines at joimail.com> wrote in message
news:41cb4239 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Oh ok.
>
> Well I'm going to do some Shrek stuff in my world. No, it's not the
original
> model that they used in the movie. It's a model I made from scratch while
> looking at a picture of the one in the movie.
>
> I was wondering if you are asking the same question of the people in aw
who
> are makeing and useing lord of the ring objects and avs.Or for that matter
> any other objects and avs that were modeled after movies they saw, such as
> say, monsters inc.?
>
> Not trying to start anything, just wondering.
>
> I am makeing a Shrek av next and need to know if that is going to be a
> problem for anyone.
>
> Imagine
>
> "linn" <ironhead at digitalpassage.com> wrote in message
> news:41cb0069 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
cc?
selling
shed
Image
>
>
|
Dec 24, 2004, 3:03am
Yep, I third those emotions! Take care all, be safe ... Happy Holidays!
LNH
--
[View Quote]"vera" <pove at rcn.com> wrote in message news:41CB7ADC.26F88C5A at rcn.com...
> Same to you Kenn and to all our dear AW community!!!!......And we will be
> watching Santas thru NORAD:))))
>
> kenneth wrote:
>
others
safe
will
>
|
Dec 26, 2004, 6:16am
It's pretty well known by now that almost all *competition* urls spoken at
AWGate will get you ejected. That's just the way it is :o/ Soooooo, just
don't say them at the gate, whispers I think is ok but not aloud.
LNH
--
[View Quote]"heu" <heu at alusion-fr.com> wrote in message
news:41ce40e0$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> where is the problem ? you look , me not look ahhahhahhahha
> clic clic clic
> who have smock ?????????
> _____________________________________________________
> H"tesse: Welcome to Alphaworld, the oldest and largest virtual world in
the
> Cyberverse. Click
>
> http://www.activeworlds.com/help/aw34/movedecade.html to see how long til
CY
> turns 10. Alphaworld cell limit
>
> now set to Large : )
> [Customs Aide]: Welcome, Heu. For the Conduct Guidelines please say World
> Rules or see
>
> http://www.activeworlds.com/community/conduct.asp
> Honeypoo: Oh btw People Merry Xmas :)
> H"tesse: Vous avez quitt, le dialogue ici
> "Detrom": herry xmas to you too
> Honeypoo: :)
> lieber: herry Xmas?
> Honeypoo: I have NO sense
> "Detrom": herry merry
> "Detrom": you get the point
> lieber: now don't say that Honey
> lieber: course you have sence
> Honeypoo: Oh thanks 4 telling Me
> lieber: well, your welcome
> "Detrom": how much does aw cost now?
> lieber: I pay over $80.00 per year myself
> "Detrom": hmm
> "Babble fish": i pay nothing -- i get it for free
> "Detrom": how much just month by month?
> Honeypoo: I don't know
> lieber: I pay once a year
> "Babble fish": $80 buys a lot of beer
> Honeypoo: Cool
> lieber: my renewal is coming up next month
> Honeypoo: lol Babble
> Honeypoo: Oh no
> lieber: why oh no Honey?
> "Detrom": hmmm. I think ill just go back to There
> Honeypoo: Oh there U are lol
> Honeypoo: Are ya going 2 renew?
> Honeypoo: where is there?
> lieber: oh you bet i am
> Heu: hi
> Mondo: 6.95 USD per month
> Honeypoo: Great :)
> Heu: *-.,,.-*-.,,.-* Merry Xmas & Happy New Year *-.,,.-*-.,,.-*
> lieber: I love AW
> lieber: I would never let it go
> Honeypoo: lol at lieber
> Mondo: 69.96 USD per year, if buying a year all at once
> "Detrom": you should check out "There". www.there.com
> Honeypoo: Merry Xmas 2 U Heu :)
> Mondo: ack 69.95
> Heu: out there.com
> [Customs Aide]: You have been ejected for unacceptable language in a
public
> area
> H"tesse: Vous avez ,t, expuls, de aw !
> ____________________________________________________
>
>
|
Dec 27, 2004, 9:23pm
NGs were down temporarily but are fixed now.
LNH
--
[View Quote]"sexy eyes" <sexyeyes at afantasy.us> wrote in message
news:41d08ed0 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Seems I don't have any new posts in the NG's since the 15th and 16th,
seemed
> kind of odd, so figured I would try one and see what happens.
>
>
>
|
Dec 28, 2004, 9:12am
Yes you are quite correct carolann :o/ but I suppose that would go for
almost everything in aw then, that is not scratch made by the person selling
or giving it away, and even then is the copyright already in effect as you
have stated.
How is it that aw can freely display the grinch avatar in Objectd' world for
instance? Or that Luney Tunes martian character ... both well copyrighted
for sure. Now they do this for free yes but copyright must have been
infringed upon in both instances just in the making of them alone. I'm sure
both were probably *found online* and converted to rwx, or perhaps some
talented individual made those also by scratch. I have a spongebob character
that someone made online ... I converted it to rwx ... not sure of the
legalities there, of course I'm not planning on selling it but may well make
it into a usable av for my world.
But yes, you are quite correct. I believe a good majority of aw is built on
such things. As you said, I doubt Imagine did anything in malice ... she
isn't that kinda gal ... and no, Linn asking the ? was not inappropriate
either ... but to ask it of one individual, well it goes much deeper in the
aw soup than one individual ...
LNH
--
[View Quote]"carolann" <charmed at yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:41d11777$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I know this kind of thing has been going on forever in here and
everywhere,
> seems small-time, but $25 is being asked AND the messenger is being killed
> (hopefully her own intent was honorable) for asking a fair question, or I
> would not have thought much or said anything about it. Is there not one
> person in here who thinks the question a fair one, or is there not enough
> honorable people who understands the issue?
>
> An unsolicited, undoubtedly unwanted, opinion, based 100% on fact:
>
> Taking a character or other identifiable (often intellectual) property
> directly from a private copyrighted work of fiction such as a book, movie
or
> song, a work not yet in the public domain, and using that copyrighted
> character or other identifiable property for private financial gain, is
> absolutely copyright infringement, highly illegal, frowned upon and often
> legally pursued by the actual owner of the intellectual property.
>
> Using such a well known item for one's own financial gain, knowing it is
> owned by some one or some company made rich by it, is probably often
viewed
> by the "borrower" in about the same way as when the bank teller
accidentally
> gives us 100 (place your monetary unit here) too much back when we cash a
> check(que) at the bank(que?). We might think; "They won't even miss it",
> "They don't need it-they're rich", "they get it off the backs of the
poor",
> "I deserve it", "I worked for it, too", "I need it worse than them"
(."more
> than most"), whatever.whatever.whatever..
>
> The chances of being found out in this small time forum by big time owners
> of the property are fairly small, but I know for a fact that it is done.
>
> Speaking of this "small-time forum", why, after all, do people here use
> passwordable object paths?? Why do object owners/makers here have a right
to
> own their stuff and lock it up, charge for it's use, but we have free use
of
> the property of DreamWorks' or anyone else who doesn't know that we are
> borrowing it for our financial gain? How can we sell it, but not have to
own
> it first? It's only an eye-ball copy? Much like when I tried to sell my
> eye-balled copy of Leo Tolstoy's "War and Peace"? But anyway-you can only
do
> that if you have the Modification Right. The modification right (also
known
> as the derivative works right) is the right to modify the work to create a
> new work. A new work that is based on a preexisting work is known as a
> "derivative work." I sure don't think Imagine did this with any malice or
> sense of "ownership" or "right", but I do think she did it without really
> weighing all the possible complications. I am sure many of us are unaware
of
> what is called a Reproduction Right. (No-not THAT reproduction). The
> reproduction right here is the right to copy, duplicate, transcribe, or
> imitate a work in fixed form.
>
> By the way-wasn't there a copyright question about AW's use of the term
> "Olympics" 2 or 3 years ago? Now THAT seemed petty, but I can't remember
the
> details.
>
> Anyway-just wondering if there is anyone who understands an issue that
> should be as important here as anywhere. Besides, I've been extremely
> impressed by some made from scratch objects, and think AW would be just as
> interesting with just those.
>
>
>
>
>
> "imagine" <imagines at joimail.com> wrote in message
> news:41d09111 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Dec 31, 2004, 8:00pm
Same to you and everyone else ... hugzzz and be safe!
LNH
--
[View Quote]"ciena" <nikona at comcast.net> wrote in message
news:41d57235 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I wish everyone a happy, healthy and prosperous new year!
>
>
|
Jan 2, 2005, 5:10am
Two things ...
1) We only see grams from TaLLan, and have no way of knowing what your
correspondence was, if you provoked him, and how. Not fair to post a one way
convo ... he is obviously replying to things you have said or grammed to
him.
2) Why bring up he's a GK? The grams are clearly not from GKDJ ... so what
do they have anything to do with him as a GK? Like all GKs, he volunteers
his time for some two hours a week ... doesn't make him God or anything, and
certainly has nothing to do with who he is *off shift*. Why is it some
people think GKs should be on their best behavior 24/7/365? Makes no sense
whatsoever! No one is in a good mood all the time, we all have bad days or
times when people provoke us to not so pleasant actions.
If he's bothering you then use aw's most wonderful *mute* feature! Bar him
from contacting you every way you can and you'll not hear from him again.
LNH
--
[View Quote]"ferruccio" <startrek3 at earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:41d7210b at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Seems that TaLLan (GKDJ when he's a GK) is getting the ETLs involved for
an
> unknown reason. TaLLan is sure sending out a good message. Is this the
> type of person that is allowed in the GK organization?
>
> http://pics.swcity.net/tallan3.jpg
>
>
|
Jan 2, 2005, 9:51pm
Only while the GK is on duty, otherwise most have a separate *private* ID to
*work* in and the two should not be associated imho.
LNH
--
[View Quote]"ferruccio" <startrek3 at earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:41d7b16b at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Well, Lady Nighthawk, in reply to number 1, I encourage TaLLan to post
what
> I said to him that day, in these NGs, in order. Also, there's no way of
> proving that I said anything to TaLLan, since I can't screenshot my own
> telegrams, so that will be up to TaLLan, if he wants to be fair about it,
to
> post what I said. The only telegram that could be considered "provoking"
> was the last telegram I sent to TaLLan, which was something regarding his
> maturity saying such things to me. TaLLan, please, post what I said to
you
> that day in these NGs. Screenshots would be good.
>
> In response to your second thing. TaLLan is a GK. Though he was not
acting
> as a GK, it was just noteable that someone acting as such would be allowed
> in the GK organization. I recall someone being kicked off the PK
> organization because he was conducting some minor griefing, if you would
> even call it that. (I will not give the name of the person. He may
gladly
> post here if he wishes to reveal himself.) Anyway, it seems that the GK
> organization, as such, is much more lenient in who they allow to join.
> Don't you think it's important to have a strict filter on who you allow to
> join an organization which represents all of Active Worlds from the
> newcomer's perspective? I think so.
>
> "lady nighthawk" <dmurtagh27 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:41d79e74$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
what
volunteers
sense
or
him
again.
for
the
>
>
|
Jan 4, 2005, 2:12am
URL doesn't work :o/
LNH
--
[View Quote]"SW Comit" <swcomit at swcity.net> wrote in message
news:41d9cad6$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> You prolly wouldn't be saying that if you heard our side of the story.
> Wanna hear: http://www.swcity.net/yabbse/index.php?topic=3021.0
> Beware it's 190 posts right now, lotta reading. The forums exploded with
> activity last night due to his outrageous behavior on his GK duty last
> night.
>
>
> "Just In" <anon at no.spam.com> wrote in message
> news:41d9bb80 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Jan 4, 2005, 2:13am
I'm sure you can report any such instances to support at activeworlds.com?
LNH
--
[View Quote]"Ryan" <ryan at example.com> wrote in message
news:41da05ed$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Unfortunately this is extremely true. I got ejected myself for simply
> asking why AWNewbie wasn't on the GK building macro. I think as
> caretaker of AWNewbie I have every right to ask and then be referred to
> someone who will answer my question without being ejected? After the
> ejection the GK reponsible (TaLLan) refused to even tell me his TL or
> how to report him. That sort of behavior is not tolerable.
>
> Ryan
>
> SW Comit wrote:
he
this
friends,
many
|
Jan 4, 2005, 2:22am
I'm saying many people have more than one cit. I'm also saying that if you
(for instance) came on aw with another cit most would likely not know. If
you have a problem with any person then contact AWI, I'm sure
support at activeworlds.com will do it? Report the Nick, and the Cit # when you
send your complaint, so if the person changes their name they can still be
found. No masking involved here ...
LNH
--
[View Quote]"strike rapier" <markyr at gmail.com> wrote in message
news:41d891e5$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> So.... what you are saying is...
>
> They should hide behind a mask so when they make mistakes they are not
held
> responsable, lets take into account the hundred or so GK abuse reports
that
> get sent in each year... How many GK's have we seen dismissed due to huge
> abuse of rights? Zero.
>
> If people use rights in AW, they should be held accountable for them, hell
I
> am when im on PS in AWTeen, everyone else is, the peacekeepers are, why
not
> GK's? Could it be because they make bad descisions.
>
> - Mark R
>
>
> "lady nighthawk" <dmurtagh27 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:41d888e6$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
ID
>
>
|
Jan 15, 2005, 4:26am
D/L the *real version* from the website, next time you are prompted to d/l
an upgrade skip it until you are sure it's a *real upgrade*. Good Luck...
LNH
--
[View Quote]"kellee" <kellee at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:41e878f8 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> And cant even get in as a tourist?
>
>
>
>
|
Jan 22, 2005, 5:41am
*Who is David*? Is that his aw nick?
LNH
--
[View Quote]"ORB" <slclarke at adelphia.net> wrote in message
news:41f136c0$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Do not trust David. He has a version of AWHack for one thing and he has
> cloner. When I first met him, while I was with BRO, he used several
> accounts and showed me 5 at once..this was back when aw was $19.95 per
> year.
> He'll only hack you and abuse your privacy.
>
>
> Builderz <builderz at vastnexus.com> wrote in message
> news:41ef6639$2 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> more
>
>
|
Jan 22, 2005, 5:38am
Love that site ... it rocks LOL
LNH
--
[View Quote]"Builderz" <builderz at vastnexus.com> wrote in message
news:41f1e73f$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> No, no, no! You've got it all wrong! Here is the correct picture of AW
> (their HQ) from space... ;)
>
> http://terraserver.microsoft.com/addressimage.aspx?t=1&s=10&Lon=-70.88944740&Lat=42.79580017&Alon=-70.88944740&Alat=42.79580017&w=1&opt=0&addr=95+Parker+St%2c+Newburyport%2c+MA+01950&qs=95+Parker+Street%7cNewburyport%7cMA%7c
>
> -Builderz
>
> SW Comit wrote:
> *snip*
|
Jan 23, 2005, 10:19am
I've not heard of this til now but perhaps try dumping your whole cache, or
better still make a backup copy of it just in case deleting it is a disaster
LOL ... then try loading the worlds and let aw do a new cache. If that
doesn't work you can go back to your backup copy! Good luck...
LNH
--
[View Quote]"the looney" <thelooney at droolbrewery.co.ier> wrote in message
news:41f34907$2 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Im not sure whats happening here but since the last few upgrades we
> reloaded the cache in some worlds and everthing has either changed
> locations (co ordinates) or objects changed ie right name but wrong
> object....
>
> This basically has destroyed worlds that where fine
>
> has anyone else experenced problems?
|
Jan 25, 2005, 9:38pm
Perhaps contact AWI directly, or ask someone to forward your post to beta NG
if you aren't in it. I was only trying to suggest a work around until it is
fixed.
LNH
--
[View Quote]"linn" <ironhead at digitalpassage.com> wrote in message
news:41f5b9b2 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> sounds good but doesn't fix the problem?
>
> "Lady NightHawk" <dmurtagh27 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:41f39643$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> or
> disaster
>
>
|
Jan 23, 2005, 10:23am
Please report to beta ... when you have aw minimized (just a button in the
taskbar) and someone sends a join request OR a file transfer request ... you
cannot click the minimized taskbar button to restore aw browser to fully
open ... you can right click the button and then click Restore but you can't
click the button and have aw browser maximize like it should. Well, I can't
anyway, it's been like this for a few builds now and is slightly annoying
:o/
LNH
--
Jan 23, 2005, 10:39pm
Thanks Strike :o}
LNH
--
[View Quote]"Lady NightHawk" <dmurtagh27 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:41f3975a at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Please report to beta ... when you have aw minimized (just a button in the
> taskbar) and someone sends a join request OR a file transfer request ...
> you cannot click the minimized taskbar button to restore aw browser to
> fully open ... you can right click the button and then click Restore but
> you can't click the button and have aw browser maximize like it should.
> Well, I can't anyway, it's been like this for a few builds now and is
> slightly annoying :o/
>
> LNH
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
|
Jan 28, 2005, 5:58am
So if someone knows better but acts unbecoming you should entertain them
with a threat or two of ejection? I, for one, would never go to awgate and
behave any other way other than what the world is rated for, I keep my convo
appropriate for any child that may be there. So why do people continually go
there and push the boundaries? Why not just go to other worlds and play
there? Act however you think is fitting of that world's rating ... you are
at the mercy of the world owners non the less.
I'm willing to bet that Rossy would have argued the fact no matter what
because he's right in his mind but isn't bearing in mind where he's at. What
makes the line his convo was taking any more right than say a gorean saying
that he likes women, women are his slaves. I'm not saying either *lifestyle*
is wrong, to each their own ... but how is that appropriate convo for the
gate with the potential of a child coming in at any time?
I agree with Mauz, awgate is a greeting place to help newcomers learn the
program, that is the first priority of GKs imho ... secondarily is to keep
the peace and keep the convos g-rated. AWgate is g-rated because there are
often young children in there ... this is nothing new! If you need to
express yourself at another more *mature* level then go to a world that is
higher rated, that's why there are ratings.
LNH
--
[View Quote]"Ryan" <ryan at example.com> wrote in message
news:41f9649c$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Then this really needs to change because it's being abused since all of
> the GKs I've seen seem to never feel that warnings are nescessary.
>
> As far as I know, for EVERY other official AWI organization that uses
> eject, at least ONE warning is required.
>
> Ryan
>
> Mauz wrote:
>
|
Jan 29, 2005, 3:54pm
I think Mauz was saying that we don't know the history between Rossy and
this GK. It may be this GK has experienced problems with him in the past and
therefore *waiting for him to offend again* is not warranted. I'm not saying
he has or hasn't ... just saying we don't know so we can't judge it. If the
action of the GK was offensive to you then (particularily Rossyboy) by all
means contact AWI directly and complain, that is your right.
LNH
--
[View Quote]"Ryan" <ryan at example.com> wrote in message
news:41fbb3b6 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Nobody is an accurate predictor of whether or not someone is gonna "try to
> start something again" or even if they're gonna start something up to
> begin with. The Bush doctrine just doesn't seem to work in AWGate...
>
> You have to let whoever mess up first THEN eject. Otherwise it's unfair.
>
> Ryan
>
> Mauz wrote:
|
Jan 30, 2005, 7:24pm
Discussing matters of sexuality should not be allowed in awgate at all.
There are many other worlds for that kind of discusssion. Although as far as
GKs go, damned if you do and damned if you don't. Some are very lax, some
stricter ... you can't regulate GKs like robots ... they're all different
people behind those keyboards ... all volunteering their time. Heck peeps
even complain about the bots and *they* follow one set of commands (albeit
according to whoever scripted them) no matter what ... even they get
complained about.
LNH
--
[View Quote]"Captain MAD Mike" <mike at swcity.net> wrote in message
news:41fd47f1$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> GK Data1: Nope you can go after women that is normal, gay behavior is not
> normal nor accepted here
>
> Data1 seems to make it clear that discussing things related to being
> heterosexual is allowed...
>
> "Mauz" <mauz at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in
> message news:41f94196$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Jan 28, 2005, 5:25am
Far as I know that feature exists in all worlds ... that's the limit no
matter the size of the world you cannot travel past those coords (in any
direction).
LNH
--
[View Quote]"Kenneth" <cosmosken at sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:41f9b1ac at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Ahh woops hehe, last time I've been to the end of AW world, I was using an
> earlier version which let me go farther out.
>
> -Kenneth
>
>
> "Tony M" <"> wrote in message news:41f9ae50$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Jan 28, 2005, 4:56pm
Media file radius seems to be messed up. I haven't changed my media so it
must be browser updates causing this, or perhaps I just never noticed it was
based on visibility according to the tests below:
Here's a sample of my media file ...
activate media bcolor=0 color=skyblue name=radio
url=HTTP://69.51.121.37:8080 "KBBZ Classic Rock" vol=100 radius=500
And yes I think I've heard max radius is 300 or so. But according to these
tests it seems to be more dependent on visibility settings!?
With visibility at 30m...
Clickable sign is located at 49N 14W
Once I get to 49N 11W the media stops
With visibility at float (*about 110m* for my connection/computer)...
Clickable sign is located at 49N 14W
Once I get to 49N 7W the media stops
With visibility at 200m...
Clickable sign is located at 49N 14W
Once I get to 49N 15E the media stops
*likes this one best* but I don't like having my vis on 110-200m, I'd prefer
60m
and have the sound continue to play well beyond what my vis may be
Should media be dependent on visibility? It has nothing to do with
visibility (aside from being attached to an object) ... it's what you hear,
not what you see. I'd like to suggest perhaps a way to have media continue
with repetition ... for instance, if I have the same code in a sign 3m away
then I don't loose the sound because it carries from one to the next and so
on? Can that be done?
LNH
--
Jan 28, 2005, 9:16pm
The object is right beside the sign, for which I have them every 5m or so
spacing. They go out of range regardless of where the next radio object is
and seems to be dependent on visibility settings. Thanks for replying
chrispeg! Hugzzz
LNH
--
[View Quote]"chrispeg" <chris at activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:41fa9380 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Hi LNH,
>
> The command you use refers to an object named 'radio'. If this object
> becomes out of range, it will stop the media playing. The define media
> radius of more than the maximum visibilitiy of 200 meters only affects the
> decrease in volume in distance of the played media.
> For a full description and to answer your other questions to the media
> command you might want to look up
> http://www.activeworlds.com/help/aw36/media_command.html.
>
> Enjoy and have fun :)
> Chris
>
>
> "Lady NightHawk" <dmurtagh27 at hotmail.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> news:41fa8adb at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Jan 29, 2005, 5:18am
Chris, thank you so much for your time and help ... you rock! Hugzzz
LNH
--
[View Quote]"chrispeg" <chris at activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:41fa9380 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Hi LNH,
>
> The command you use refers to an object named 'radio'. If this object
> becomes out of range, it will stop the media playing. The define media
> radius of more than the maximum visibilitiy of 200 meters only affects the
> decrease in volume in distance of the played media.
> For a full description and to answer your other questions to the media
> command you might want to look up
> http://www.activeworlds.com/help/aw36/media_command.html.
>
> Enjoy and have fun :)
> Chris
>
>
> "Lady NightHawk" <dmurtagh27 at hotmail.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> news:41fa8adb at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
|
