1  2  3  4  5  6  ...  12  |   Order by default

Mar 26, 2004, 5:50pm

It sets it off center though when you do that and screws it up heh.


[View Quote]

Mar 27, 2004, 11:04am

Depends on how long your message is heh

[View Quote]

Mar 26, 2004, 5:49pm

Yes, that would be very useful. Much easier than using the create mask crap
and would take up less space. even just create opa 0.0001 so you're not
wasting 4 characters (opacity)


[View Quote]

Mar 28, 2004, 8:40pm

???

Can you explain it a bit better, I don't understand what you mean by "turn
terrain loose."
[View Quote]

Mar 29, 2004, 6:13pm

Oh yeah, I wish for that too =\


[View Quote]

Apr 11, 2004, 3:10am

Cits as well... would like to be able to organize them into groups or
folders.


[View Quote]

Apr 13, 2004, 5:48pm

Or... they can extend your world expiration date, userlimit, size, or
citizen bot limit...(last one's un-related to the last post, but related to
the original topic hehe)


[View Quote]

Apr 18, 2004, 2:24am

How... do you password a .txt file?

or get AW to store it in a zip w/ password thus saving some space at the
same time. AW should store all chat logs in files based on months. Chat logs
often get so long that you cannot load them X_X

[View Quote]

Apr 21, 2004, 9:08pm

Than by default it should be off.


[View Quote]

Jun 21, 2004, 4:24pm

I second that motion ^^

[View Quote]

Jul 25, 2004, 6:21pm

I'm from the USA and I think eep asked some good questions. I don't know wtf
you're on about .sharon... what does Andras being from another country have
to do with anything at all. (Don't reply to that question it'll start a
flame war.)

[View Quote]

Aug 20, 2004, 1:13am

Cit options only obviously. CT's/EJ can see you of course, and the option to
be completely invisible... YES! I've gotten tons of questions by people when
I put a yellow ? mark on such as "You can make it so I can see you but
no-one else can if you wanted to...".

[View Quote]

Aug 20, 2004, 6:56pm

How about you cannot see other people in invisible mode except for people
with eject or Caretakers?

[View Quote]

Sep 17, 2004, 8:33pm

Me too.

[View Quote]

Sep 18, 2004, 12:31am

/me grabs a pitchfork and torch

WITCH WITCH WITCH WITCH WITCH WITCH WITCH WITCH! SET HIM TO THE STAKE AND
BURN HIM ALIVE!

[View Quote]

Oct 8, 2004, 10:08pm

Folders to sort contacts and teleports in general (into folders) would be
nice. :P


[View Quote]

Oct 21, 2004, 5:05pm

If this were Disney World(s) you probably would be. :)

Disney World. Where dreams can come true.

[View Quote]

Oct 25, 2004, 9:19am

If AW were more like the FarCry Sandbox we'd be moving in a forward
direction. It's a real time editor that is EXTREMELY easy to use even for
the nubs. I figured it all out within minutes of opening it up. You can find
objects in a list of objects. Having a basic set of objects would be fine
and for those of us with cable we could download objects on the fly. This
does happen to be the digital era, if you've got a dial-up modem too bad for
you. I think having an editor like the FarCry Sandbox would improve AW
greatly.

CryTek engine is a different story though. hehe. It'd be nice too but... you
need a good graphics card.

Oct 25, 2004, 5:08pm

[View Quote] I'm sure most areas in other countries can supply you with something faster
than dialup. Cable, Satellite, DSL. One way or another, downloads in AW are
bad anyway (at the moment) for 56k users.

> Oh, but remember this is the digital era, and the same is true if you
> haven't got a good graphics card - "too bad" dude, stick with the times!
>
> Yours Sincerely,
> Samuël ML Lison

I have a good graphics card. GeForce FX 5900. Cost about $150.

A GeForce4 MX 440SE can run FarCry and they are about $40 or $50.

Oct 26, 2004, 9:17am

Hehe neither would I.

I didn't say you CAN'T use a 56k connection. It would not be any worse than
it is right now for 56k users and objects. I went on at a friends house the
other day on 56k and X_X would have taken an hour to download all the
objects. That's kinda what I meant by the whole cable vs. 56k thing. I've
been to Australia and stayed and met a couple of families who didn't even
know they were using a 56k modem (I asked if they were on cable or 56k they
were like 'huh'? lol.) That and prices were a little high for cable (is what
the parents said). Cool place though I had a great time.

Oct 26, 2004, 5:05pm

Ok so than there's no issue at all. So we should get better objects and a
better engine.

[View Quote]

Nov 25, 2004, 10:46am

and to be specific make sure it remembers that size :P

[View Quote]

Dec 1, 2004, 9:16am

One flag from each country represented by the United Nations would be ok
otherwise it's getting out of hand.

[View Quote]

Dec 4, 2004, 10:12am

lol I went to Australia last (summer for the US -- winter for them) and it
was about 21°C and they were all complaining it was cold and I was walking
around in short sleeves and shorts. Was pretty funny though. They were like
wait untill the summer here it gets to be about 40+ and I'm like ........ it
gets to be about 40+ where I live during the summer too... Australia is
soooooooo uber. I loved it a lot. It looks cool, the people are great, and
Sydney is like... the cleanest city I've ever been to. (Besides Montreal,
Canada)

Anyways I went a little off topic.

I liked the gate last year with the snow. It's a cool change from the same
old gate. If they're not going to make it snow, at least re-make the gate to
a christmassy theme of some sort.

[View Quote]

Feb 25, 2005, 10:25am

I don't understand why this is so hard... aren't all of the effects stored
client side anyway. All AW would have to do is make the browser read terrain
and get attributes from the terrain and change it's atts accordingly.

I know things like rain are a different story lol... need particle systems
(for the most part) and the air pockets would be somewhat harder... unless
you just change the fog and gravity which is again stored client side.

The browser is completely set up for it... just need a way for the server to
store that info and the browser to use it.

Mar 3, 2005, 6:08pm

You'd have to have your view up to at least 100 to see the objet though...
and if you go out of it's range it'd dissappear. There needs to be something
like static objects that are always rendered no matter the distance. CTs or
people with EJ/ED only...

-Z

[View Quote]

Jun 30, 2003, 8:04pm

http://www.keytools.com/software/joy2mouse.htm


[View Quote]

Jul 5, 2003, 8:33pm

Yeah... I think there is amazing too O_O. Unfortunately, AW still kicks ass
because... no chat box at the bottom of your screen (you have to read the
damn bubbles), and NO BUILDING!!! They did however just get live radio (via
Winamp/Shoutcast) and live voice chat O_O. The grafics are absolutely out of
this world, but still there's no avatar selection... but There does have
buggies, and hoverboards, and the new hoverboats (you can take 4 other
people with you), and the new hoverbikes (like motorcycles).

[View Quote]

Jul 6, 2003, 12:50am

Anywhere between 3 days and a year o.O

[View Quote]

Jul 12, 2003, 9:02pm

Anyone know where I can get one for Maya 5.0 (or 4.5)?

1  2  3  4  5  6  ...  12  |   Order by default