Board ArchivesSite FeaturesActiveworlds SupportHistoric Archives |
ubermonkey // User Search
ubermonkey // User SearchCY Comments?Jul 24, 2005, 2:03pm
I'm personally going to suggest a structure like so:
1) Nominate judges. 2) Elect judges by popular vote. 3) Judge review and voting on all award nominees. 4) Popular review and voting on all award nominees (before the results of #3 are available). 5) Give out 3 grand prizes, which could technically all go to the same entry: Community's Choice (winner of the popular vote), Judges Choice (winner of the judges' vote), and of course the actual ... whatever, the first prize, whatever it's officially known as (overall winner by total points). Of course, judge votes are worth more points than popular votes (the relative scaling would need some thought), and only the real winner by points gets the actual CY award (and prize? Assuming there are prizes), however the other two get "official" recognition (unless one entry gets both or all three spots, which is highly possible), which is probably what most people want out of the CY's anyway: a chance to have their work seen by the community. If it seemed appropriate, you could go back and do a revote with the top 5 entries from the first voting cycle, though I don't honestly know if people would rather have the voting process be less or more involved (national statistics say 1/3 of the people who register to vote don't actually bother to show up for presidential elections -- why did you register? O_O). Judges would have to be the types of people who would have no reason to be biased, so it can't be anyone from a specific AW community, and it should probably not be anyone who's particularly active in AW development these days; It would be best if we could get a lot of semi-retired AW cits who know the territory but no longer have a direct interest in what's going on. I don't know how many people are left with citnums in the <= 5-digit range, but that's probably about who you'd be looking for (Builderz comes to mind immediately, citnums aside, as well as quite a few people who are likely no longer here). Thoughts? [View Quote] America, love it or leave it...(wait, I'll get you the door)Jul 26, 2005, 3:11pm
Allow me to step in and make my traditional crowd-displeasing remarks.
Surely, you didn't think you could post these things without getting my attention, did you? You haven't the slightest clue what's going on outside; there's a fire burning, and I don't suggest you step out the door if you don't want to burn with it. Come back when you have serious information on the state of the world. Come back when you are prepared to discuss the core issues of our current timeline, not the symptoms of perpetual disease. The average person is far better off knowing next to nothing about the course of history, so I sincerely suggest you step down. [View Quote] Indeed, let us "play nice." You don't understand what you're doing; society is on edge like never before, set into motion by the amazing communication power of the internet. We don't need anymore people throwing matches into the streets, regardless of whether they're "compassion flares" or pipebombs. If you want to talk about the issues of society, then stand up and give us a hand, because at this point, we could use all the help we can get. We need scientists, mathematicians, historians, engineers, and linguists, but not pyromaniacs. -HT Thank you Heu for setting it straightJul 29, 2005, 4:13am
The Tallan GameAug 21, 2005, 3:24pm
Hipacital? Grap? Haressing?
I'm amazed at all these new internet words that are showing up now. I'm really not familiar with grap, but I imagine it's related to the linux "grep" function. Let's all just take a moment to pronounce "hipacital." Fun, yes? How about, "the hipacital man haressed the woman by graping her in public." This is how I'm going to insult people in family-oriented environments from now on. "You sitopit shiltokhead! What a hipacital son of a borchamb. You make me want to pookilate up my breakfast." Seriously, don't make me grap you up with a wrook. [View Quote] I think you should all stop arguing!Aug 23, 2005, 5:36am
Abusing monkeys is no laughing matter.
I'm saying something else so it's not a one-liner. Blah blah blah I like food. [View Quote] |