Board ArchivesSite FeaturesActiveworlds SupportHistoric Archives |
chiana // User Search
chiana // User SearchCreating a nice .RWX browser...Mar 24, 2003, 9:18pm
the textures for use with rwxmod have to be in .bmp format
greeter / tour botOct 23, 2002, 2:49pm
Hi :o)
anyone know where i can get a greeter / tour bot from please, or a script for an Xelag to do the same ? anyone treid this bot before?Nov 17, 2002, 12:34pm
i came accross this bot its in beta at the moment
looks like it has loads of features was wondering if anyone has tried it and if it's any good ? http://www.petrossa.com/Chazbot/ private chat botFeb 27, 2003, 1:06am
try this bot : http://www.petrossa.com/Chazbot/
i know it can handle private conversations between multiple people Creating a nice .RWX browser...Mar 24, 2003, 9:18pm
the textures for use with rwxmod have to be in .bmp format
loggin in errorApr 17, 2003, 12:13pm
Hi :o)
can anyone tell me what this means please ? Error NO_INSTANCE occured in function aw_destroy it happends everytime i try to log a bot into my world. loggin in errorApr 17, 2003, 12:42pm
could this be something to do with a change in the world server ? the world
i am getting the error in is on build 52 , i dont get this error if i take the same bot into a world useing build 48. darkness commandNov 19, 2002, 4:50pm
i wish we could use a create light command
with a tag something like brightness= -3 to make a local area darker rather than brighter world user listApr 18, 2003, 7:17pm
how about a way of telling who is in a world ?
maybe you could right click on a world in the list and it would popup a user list of people in there. this could be a tied into the privacy setting for each user so they could dissable this feature. world user listApr 18, 2003, 8:29pm
[View Quote]
yeah thats true enough, but it could be set as default that it hides you on
the world list, and maybe there could be a setting for world caretakers to dissable this feature ? was just a though :) world user listApr 18, 2003, 10:16pm
in my first post " this could be a tied into the privacy setting for each
user so they could dissable this feature. " so they would be able to set it in their own privacy settings kinda like disblaying what world you are in you can choose to or not to. New LEGAL UniverseJan 23, 2003, 11:55pm
I dont think it is a universe is it ?
I thought a single world p50 was a galaxy server they seem to be into promoting singers and artists sounds like a good idea, cant see too many people going there though as build is very limited. New Worm Rocking the Internet - UDP Port 1434Jan 25, 2003, 5:10pm
ME and XP are both good Operating Systems, and anyone with any techie PC
savvy would know that some PC's will run perfectly on a certain OS and others wont, it is all hardware related, my server runs 100 % stable on ME and get rebooted maybe once every 2 or 3 weeks for maintenance ( defrag etc ) yet the same server will not run on Server 2000 or XP it constantly crashes right from the start. yet my other PC's on the LAN run XP pro and 2000 without a glitch. Fighting, arrogance, immaturity... etcFeb 9, 2003, 4:49pm
" Please come and check out PC. "
spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam spam Fighting, arrogance, immaturity... etcFeb 9, 2003, 4:55pm
hey thats cool i got blocked ! makes me feel all important hee hee :oP
Uploader ScriptMar 23, 2003, 6:17pm
Hi :o)
does anyone know where i could get a web based image uploading script from please ? ideally i would like it so that someone clicks a browse button then selects the image on their HD and then clicks submit and it uploads the image to a web server, then it displays the image and underneath it the full image url would be shown. it is for a free texture collection i am starting up. :o) public 3.4 betaApr 15, 2003, 9:24am
the AFK icon is darker and does not seem very clear
and when pressing side step you make too bigger movement, making it hard to get in just the right place public 3.4 betaApr 15, 2003, 3:49pm
small movements arnt the same now it overshoots
maybe it will just take some getting used to :o) 3.4 my opinion for what it's worthApr 15, 2003, 12:54pm
this has been released too soon for a public beta.
there is still work that needs to be done, %90 of people that i have talked to includeing myself do not certain aspects of the new movement and seq behavior. maybe instead of releasing 3.4 on open beta it would have been better to keep it as a closed beta and just enlarge the beta users ? 3.4 my opinion for what it's worthApr 15, 2003, 2:20pm
[View Quote]
the seqs arnt perfect at all, the wait seq restarts itself after about 5
secs like a continuous loop 3.4 my opinion for what it's worthApr 15, 2003, 3:41pm
seqs always looped but not after 5 secs of starting LOL
wait seq starts 5 secs after starting it restarts and then it follows this loop untill you move, if this is a bug i fail to see how it could have been missed as it is totally ovious 3.4 my opinion for what it's worthApr 15, 2003, 5:43pm
1 faster and smoother doesnt make it better
that is your opinion 2 i dont care weather you believe me or not, out of 20 or so people that i am in contact with that have gone over to the beta since yesterday most of them have all said it is now difficult to move your avatar in small increments compared to how it was in 3.3 , now it just overshoots. " Please, next time reconsider saying that others don't like the system. They can post on their own if they don't like it." sort it out LOL * rolls eyes * 3.4 my opinion for what it's worthApr 15, 2003, 5:55pm
err what difference does that make ?
when 3.4 comes out if small movments stay like they are now the people that have problems with it now will still have problems with it then lol [View Quote] 3.4 my opinion for what it's worthApr 15, 2003, 6:54pm
" a) too fast acceleration, make it impossible to navigate precisely (eg.
landing on pole, sidestep of a few cm only: The smallest possible move (average of multiple tries) is about 70cm now, when it was 20cm before. " thats what i meant but you explained it better , thanks lol 3.4 my opinion for what it's worthApr 16, 2003, 9:49am
thats really going to help when the beta is over and it is a forced upgrade
from 3.3 to 3.4 and the mentioned issuses stay the same for the people that have them, why do you think it was mentioned here ? , it wasnt to complain it wasnt to say " i dont want it " , as the title says it was to share my opinion. [View Quote] <no subject>Apr 15, 2003, 3:31pm
if this is a bug they must have know about it before they released the open
beta it is instantly obvious, wait seq starts 5 secs later wait seq restarts then loops |