|
.duo. // User Search
.duo. // User Search
Feb 17, 2003, 10:37pm
I removed the checking of citnames from teh bot, there was just no point.
I'm just using them as variables. Its only a temporary bot anyway, I'm makng
an advanced rightsbot in VB which will take a while to program. I guess I'm
kind of rusty at programming, I learned VB programming in 1999 and C++ in
2000. I rarely program. Why should I use a file? What difference does it
make, more easily edited? Its also less secure... but its what I'm going to
do in my VB RightsBot, so I don't even know why I'm saying this crap, heh
heh heh.
[View Quote]"bowen" <thisguyrules at 7k2.4mg.com.ANTISPAM> wrote in message
news:3e517635 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
> "baron sweetman" <petrossadeletethis at msn.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns93264C96EA96petrossa at 64.94.241.201...
>
> If you really want to use citnames, put the citnumbers in a file and then
use
> aw_citizen_attributes_by_number (int citizen) to get their citname. Would
be a
> little harder, but in the end it's a lot more flexable. Especially if you
happen to
> be having those tedious name changers.
>
> --Bown--
>
>
|
Feb 17, 2003, 10:42pm
The thing is, I'm building an RPG and terrain comes out much better
hand-done than demeter-done. I want to have security as well as quality >_<
so I don't have time to gain experience with it, could someone just write
the code (according to my bot) for it? If its not too much trouble that is.
[View Quote]"andras" <andras at andras.net> wrote in message
news:3e5118d6 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> .duo. wrote:
BTW, is
>
> Only if your bot is running as an admin client. Considering your
experience I don't advise you to try it too soon.
>
> --
> Andras
> "It's MY computer" (tm Steve Gibson)
>
|
Feb 18, 2003, 11:06am
Yeah, but whats the point?
[View Quote]"bowen" <thisguyrules at 7k2.4mg.com.ANTISPAM> wrote in message
news:3e5186fb$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
> ".duo." <ncommons at attbi.com> wrote in message
> news:3e518063$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
point.
makng
I'm
in
it
going to
heh
>
> How is a file less secure than a built in variable? As long as you're
hosting it,
> there's no worries.
>
> --Bowen--
>
>
|
Feb 17, 2003, 10:43pm
I haven't good any bots working yet, and I know, or knew everything about
C++ once >_<
[View Quote]"equin0x" <equin0x at activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:3e4c80b4 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Have you got one bot working yet?
>
> If not, you will see my point.
>
> "scuz" <webmaster at awscape.com> wrote in message
> news:3e4c5c0f at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Feb 18, 2003, 11:08am
Two years ago I would have been able to tell you everything in the Direct X
sdk, winsock, opengl sdk, and more. I just never program so I forgot it
all, heh heh heh. I never speak Spanish either, and I kinda forgot a lot of
the Spanish I've learned >_<
[View Quote]"grimble" <grimble2000 at btinternet:com> wrote in message
news:3e51a317 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Hmmm ... I doubt that.
>
> ".duo." <ncommons at attbi.com> wrote in message
> news:3e51819f$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Feb 17, 2003, 10:47pm
Example of evil C++ memory error:
#include <iostream.h>
struct MemErr
{
int crash;
};
void main()
{
while(true)
{
MemErr *Omega=new MemErr;
}
}
I assure you that if you put that into a C++ document and run it, it will
eventually crash your computer, or at least everything its running. I
forget but I think you have to do "Delete Omega;" or something to delete it
from memory so it doesn't crash your computer.
[View Quote]"frizzlefried" <someone at microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:3e517338 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I've done commercial development in both C++ and Java, and it's true that
> there really isn't much of a difference conceptually between the two.
> Personally I think that C++ is an all around better language - however,
that
> being said, Java has many advantages, especially if you are new to
> programming:
>
> * You don't really need to worry about memory management with Java, where
as
> with C/C++ it's usually the thing that kills new programmers - and
programs
> (literally).
>
> * There is no need to create header files or prototypes when creating an
> object, so consequently is more intuitive for new developers.
>
> * The standard libraries for Java are way more robust than the standard
> libraries for C++, including classes for handling such things as XML,
> regular expressions, compression, cryptography, sound, vectors, and user
> interface, to name a few.
>
> * When sticking to standard Java, it is extremely portable by virtue that
it
> is an interpreted language. And there are Java runtimes (of one version or
> another) on virtually every platform.
>
> All of the above in my opinion would lead me to suggest that Java is
> "easier" to use and learn - even if it is not "better". But hey, that's
just
> my opinion. On the other hand if you are going to learn both, I would
> probably start with C++ because you will get a better practical sense of
OO
> design, and it will definitely be easier to switch to Java from C++ than
the
> other way around... not to mention you will pick up some nasty habits from
> doing too much development in Java. ;-)
>
> I also have some comments regarding the statements bellow:
>
>
>
>
> I don't know if you are talking about Swing or AWT, but in either case
they
> are not much different than any other GUI framework. I actually prefer
Swing
> to MFC. As far as being portable.. well, I have no idea what you are
talking
> about.. how is C++ going to be _more_ portable than Java? Especially GUI?
>
>
> I would urge you to look at some commercial applications built with Java,
> like: JBuilder, InstallAnywhere, Magik, or Limewire, for example. Most
> people probably wouldn't even know that they were Java apps. Of course you
> won't get exactly the same performance from Java that you would from
> something built with C++, but you do get the robustness of using the Java
> platform.
>
>
> That's the truth!
>
> Peace.
> -ff
>
> the
>
>
|
Feb 18, 2003, 11:14am
Yeah, maybe I should >_< takes up less memory for one. Its just the
programming style I got into after I forgot most of C++, heh heh heh. I at
least used to know everything basic and useful.
You don't have to attack me though grimble...
Obviously if something in a program doesn't work correctly... it either is
an error or has an error. I wrote that code to purposely show whats bad to
do with DMA, I actually know, or at least knew everything about DMA >_<
Maybe I should just go read a book or something, lol
[View Quote]"bowen" <thisguyrules at 7k2.4mg.com.ANTISPAM> wrote in message
news:3e51a343 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
> "grimble" <grimble2000 at btinternet:com> wrote in message
> news:3e51a1e9$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
the
touching it
for
hasn't
are
>
> He likes to use dynamic memory allocation a lot... that seems to be his
downfall too.
> Bowen thinks .duo. should stick to static sized variables.
>
> --Bowen--
>
>
|
Feb 19, 2003, 12:14am
Damn, I can't post one little thing without getting attacked 5 times >_<
[View Quote]"agent1" <agent1 at shatteredplatters.com.nospam> wrote in message
news:3e527d98 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> There is no error in the behavior of the program. It is doing exactly what
you tell it to: Allocate a new object forever. It only crashes because your
computer doesn't have infinite memory.
>
> -Agent1
>
> .duo. wrote:
is
to
>
|
Feb 21, 2003, 12:29am
Anyway, can anyone offer any help in me running the bot as an admin client.
I know its way too advanced and crap but I really need to add CTs and get
rid of them too, beacuse demeter done terrain looks like crap.
Feb 17, 2003, 11:14am
I found a site where you can download it illegally... but that isn't right,
now is it. Anyway, I have no idea how to program a bingo bot, so I can't
help you, sorry. I struggle to make a simple rights bot >_<
For what your gonna use it for, AW isn't charging enough...
[View Quote]"goddess innie" <ami at chazdesigns.com> wrote in message
news:3e4c6b20$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Wishlist didnt do this post any justice. I am desperately trying to
either
> build a bingo bot, or "aquire" one. Does anyone know anything about
> building a bingo bot, etc?
>
> "Renting" one from AW costs $380/yr. Kindof outrageous for a bot if you
ask
> me.
>
>
|
Feb 23, 2003, 10:08pm
How do you use the com wrappre anyway? heh heh heh
[View Quote]"scuz" <webmaster at awscape.com> wrote in message
news:3e5915b8 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Could sombody make a full vb proj, that shows how to use query in the cw.
> ive tried and tried, and it seems to only find the obs i dont want to
find.
>
>
|
Jul 12, 2003, 3:15pm
Wow, thanks (-:
[View Quote]"r i c h a r d" <richard.lazenby1 at ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:3f0d0e52 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I have updated the ocx to contrin all properties but only in read only.
> Please check to see if ive missed any properties i took them from
> http://www.activeworlds.com/sdk/ which i noticed was missing
> AW_UNIVERSE_WELCOME_MESSAGE to change properties continue to use the
> AwStringSet AwIntSet AwBoolSet
>
> http://www.xeonsoft.co.uk/downloads/awsdkocx6beta2.zip
>
> For now im continuing on Ocx files though talking to MrGrimm i might
change
> it to be an uncompiled user control or a class file so your exe doesn't
> require 2 dependancies (Once ive completed all the properties read/write
>
>
|
Aug 16, 2003, 6:17pm
sdk.QuickStartGlobal = True
sdk.aw_init AW_BUILD
Dim rc As Long
rc = sdk.QuickStart(342836, "PASSWORD REMOVED (-:", "Duobot", "Duobot",
"jediwrld", 0, 0, 0, 0, 0)
If rc Then MsgBox rc
peoplepos = 0
help, lol
BTW, thanks for sdkocx6 richard
Aug 16, 2003, 6:29pm
What am I supposed to use then? heh heh heh
umm... thanks? lol
[View Quote]"strike rapier" <strike at Rapiercom.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3f3e93e7 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Feck knows.... (Btw, dont use SdkOcx6!!!)...
>
> dim rc as long
> rc = sdk.aw_init(AW_BUILD)
> if (rc) then
> MsgBox "Error Code on Init: " & rc
> end if
>
> ".duo." <ncommons at comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:3f3e9164$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Aug 17, 2003, 10:08am
Ah, thanks
[View Quote]"strike rapier" <strike at Rapiercom.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3f3e9e62 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> AwSdkDll2 - www.grimmsoft.com
>
> Then use the RC number given to find the cause of the error on
> www.activeworlds.com/sdk/reason.htm
>
> - Mark
>
> ".duo." <ncommons at comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:3f3e9441$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> "Duobot",
>
>
|
Aug 17, 2003, 10:09am
I'm terrible at making windows programs in C++ though, rofl.
[View Quote]"strike rapier" <strike at Rapiercom.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3f3eb62a at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Yeah... that too... but you gotta start somewhere (Just not VB... I can
> honestly say once you know of arrays, loops and basic handling... get the
> hell outta VB... don't go into API and such.. its a waste of time, C++ is
> 100% directly.. no screwing about. :)
>
> - Mark
>
> "joeman" <joeman at bootdown.com> wrote in message
> news:3f3eb2bb$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
isn't
> a
one?
>
>
|
Aug 17, 2003, 10:11am
I agree. I myself use red hat and windows, and in terms of programming I use
C++, C, Java, and VB (more if I knew more).
[View Quote]"baron" <pk39srt at hot[youknowwhat].com> wrote in message
news:MPG.19a9442ae1e8bd5e98968b at news.activeworlds.com...
> In article <3f3ef4ce$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com>, joeman at bootdown.com
says...
high
>
> Then you are probably looking in the wrong places assuming that you even
bothered looking
> in the first place, of course the syntax is slightly different for job
openings than the
> one you used :)
>
> My point is, learn all you can and don't underestimate corporate standards
like VB out of
> superiority syndrome or whatever other mystical reasons. Things are hard
and they are
> going to get harder; no one likes one trick ponies. If you know C++, learn
VB and Delphi;
> if you know windows, learn unix. Btw from my experience, the "for high
paying position"
> part is wishful thinking for any programmer with a null or less than two
pages CV who
> knows only one language (even if that is assembly).
>
> ./B
|
Aug 17, 2003, 10:13am
I know like 2 things in C. One of them is printf, and the other is scanf
rofl.
I would use C++ if I was good with the windows API in it (-:. I'm great with
swing in java, too bad there isn't an sdk for that...
[View Quote]"joeman" <joeman at bootdown.com> wrote in message
news:3f3f22de$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Ok, so... I know every windows version (save windows 1.0), unix, Linux,
> Solaris, OS X.... I know VB, and C/C++, enough assembly to get me through
> some tight spots, PHP, XBox API... and a lot more... So, now what do I
> learn? It seems I've already met and exceeded your "quota" to diss on VB.
> Also, I've read plenty of job listings.
>
> So, I say I'm fully qualified to say that VB is a horrible programming
> language. Not only do you need runtime DLLs to run the most basic code,
but
> its really not programming at all, only scripting. You can do a lot more
> with C, its more portable, and it also does require 9 million runtime dlls
> that bloat up your system.
>
> Sure, it might be *easy*, but sometimes the easy way, isn't the best way
to
> do things. Compare a basic C application with a VB one, both do the exact
> same thing. You'll find that VB wastes like, 400 - 900KB on god knows
what.
> I will admit, I've used VB for a few simple programs when I don't want to
> mess with Winsock and windows in C, but all of those programs sucked. All
I
> can say is: been there, done that, hated it.
>
> Seriously... learn C for Christ's sake.
>
> -Joe
>
> "baron" <pk39srt at hot[youknowwhat].com> wrote in message
> news:MPG.19a9442ae1e8bd5e98968b at news.activeworlds.com...
> says...
for
> high
> bothered looking
> openings than the
standards
> like VB out of
> and they are
learn
> VB and Delphi;
> paying position"
> pages CV who
>
>
|
Aug 17, 2003, 10:14am
Exactly why I'm using VB... its just easier lol
[View Quote]"baron" <pk39srt at hot[youknowwhat].com> wrote in message
news:MPG.19a95ddf92ffd53398968c at news.activeworlds.com...
> In article <3f3f22de$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com>, joeman at bootdown.com
says...
through
VB.
but
more
dlls
to
exact
what.
to
All I
>
> To me, no one is qualified to say any language is a "horrible programming
language",
> especially when we are talking about the most used problem solving
language in corporate
> environments used by millions of programmers but this is the internet,
anyone says
> whatever they want :)
>
> Nobody cares in the real world (!=bots) for the "400 - 900KB" wasted
(which is a false
> assertion) or the "9 million runtime dlls that bloat up your system"
(ditto). They want
> the job done, as fast as possible and have a solution that can be easily
supported and
> developed; not have 3,000 lines of code just for sending an app to the
systray (or your
> winsock example) just because it *might* execute 100ms faster. I have seen
a lot of bad C
> code as well as a lot of bad VB code and a lot of bad Java code and a lot
of bad ------
> (insert lang name here) code; all languages are great just as all OS are
great, it's how
> you use them that makes the difference.
>
> If you have the knowledge you mentioned, that's good for you; you are not
a one trick
> pony which was the point in my original post. Anyway this has gone enough
off topic so I
> rest my case here; not sure why you assume I don't know C though :)
>
> ./B
|
Aug 17, 2003, 10:21am
"Course... the best bit of C++ over VB is OOP, the class based structure and
derivision etc of C++ kicks the preverbial shite out of anything VB can
offer like that... I remember using Brants classes for avatars... and it
ended up taking like half a second to loop though the avatars and check
several variables, mainly because you had to call bloody member functions to
get and set variables! Now on a bot that handles typically 50 to 100 events
a second this is... bad... Then, I created the whole project in C++, and
whooosh, direct access to all the variables, and public, private and
protected content!"
yeah, that's why I want to use C++. But I don't get how your supposed to use
the windows API with it... and I don't really remember the windows API
anyway, roflmao.
"Not to mention no variants! (Unless you use COleVariant classes for DAO DB
as Im having to...) which speeds things up a rediculous level... and the
concept of overloading is absolutly brilliant... Take my Zeus bot for
example... the console message to user function, its overloaded with....
ConsoleMessage(CString szMessage, int red, int green, int blue, bool bold,
bool italics);
ConsoleMessage(CConsoleMessage *pConsoleMsg);
ConsoleMessage(CAwMessageDump *pMessageDump);
Now thats infinatly better than having 3 different function names for each
of them... they may need different bodies but its still a brilliant way of
handling things..."
Another reason I want to use C++... but I'm terrible at windows API, not to
mention C++ in general rofl.
"But, like I said.. when you basically want to take something like a text
box
and do some replacements at once, you can't beat VB for dev time, 10
seconds, literally... best because of its form based development... Of
course once you start dumping into things like API, and copying and pasting
a exoillion lines of API code into modules... (Unless you were l33t and made
a VB add in *G*) it gets damned annoying! Personally I don't see why you
have to have a hundred lines of const int WM_BLAH = &3B2C..."
Which is why I was using VB, I want a windows GUI but I suck at windows API
(and don't know how to combine it with the AW SDK anyway).
"Anyway, thats what I wanted to say.. I just find C++ more of an actual
programming language... and less of just writing stuff out in plain english,
lets face it.. natural language IS slower... GUI vs DOS... DOS wins hands
down for most things (excluding graphics design etc, hehe)..."
Yup. I want my windows API though, lol.
Aug 17, 2003, 10:35am
I suck with MFC too, rofl
[View Quote]"strike rapier" <strike at Rapiercom.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3f3f7457 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Then use... mfc....
>
> - Mark
>
> ".duo." <ncommons at comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:3f3f734a$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> and
it
functions
> to
> events
> use
> DB
bold,
each
of
> to
text
> pasting
> made
> API
> english,
hands
>
>
|
Aug 17, 2003, 10:41am
What do you include to get CString? heh heh heh
[View Quote]"strike rapier" <strike at Rapiercom.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3f3f7457 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Then use... mfc....
>
> - Mark
>
> ".duo." <ncommons at comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:3f3f734a$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> and
it
functions
> to
> events
> use
> DB
bold,
each
of
> to
text
> pasting
> made
> API
> english,
hands
>
>
|
Aug 17, 2003, 10:58am
thanks
[View Quote]"strike rapier" <strike at Rapiercom.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3f3f7a3a at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> StdAfx - precompiled header
>
> - Mark
>
> ".duo." <ncommons at comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:3f3f7806$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Aug 17, 2003, 5:37pm
The problem isthat I'm not recieving any error codes... and I'm using
awsdk2.dll
[View Quote]"strike rapier" <strike at Rapiercom.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3f3e93e7 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Feck knows.... (Btw, dont use SdkOcx6!!!)...
>
> dim rc as long
> rc = sdk.aw_init(AW_BUILD)
> if (rc) then
> MsgBox "Error Code on Init: " & rc
> end if
>
> ".duo." <ncommons at comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:3f3e9164$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Aug 17, 2003, 7:36pm
I already have a book :-P. Anyway, I could get the login code to work no
matter what I tried. Its kind of dumb )-: do I need a timawwait?
[View Quote]"strike rapier" <strike at Rapiercom.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3f3f95e0 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Let me give all of the newbs to programming a piece of advice from my own
> experience...
>
> Way yonder back, I wanted to be a programmer. I was shopping one day, and
> found a book in a bookshop called "Using Visual Basic" it was about £6.99
so
> I bought it...
>
> I took it home... fired up Visual Basic.. and then set to work! I wondered
> why most the stuff it told me to do didnt actually exist in my version of
> the VB IDE... and why I had to load it up though MS Word each time, It
didnt
> say anything about that in the book... oh dear... yep you guessed it, I
> thought VBA was full VB... what a prat I was...
>
> Anyway, VB went out the window for a few weeks... then, a friend gave me a
> VB package, the one above the training edition... and I realised... wow!
> Timer control, this must be the real deal! Indeed it was... I managed
> form.print "Hello World" and was amazed with myself and went running off
> bragging about how good I was at VB... sad sad me...
>
> I spent about 10 hours a day coding... lol, Managed to make 3 calculators
> erm... all using inputboxes and just had basic stuff... litterally, utter
> crap...
>
> You only learn how crap you are at something when your either humble...
> which lets face it no new programmer is... or you have a more experienced
> programmer take the piss... in my case it was the latter... and Robbie
> (Gamer at the time) absolutly slammed me when I couldent even impliment a
> simple function!
>
> I copied and pasted and thought I was soooo l33t not understanding the
first
> bloody thing about what the hell I was doing with all this code, error
after
> error.... It was about this time Baron was close to having a mental
> breakdown from me telegraming him every... 30 seconds or so... (no...
> literally) and at this time he gave me this really brilliant idea.... why
> not... get a book!? The idea seemed so enlightening at the time, so I went
> off down to PC world and I got a book called 'Visual Basic Step By Step'
> from the MS press....
>
> I spent the next 3 week or so doing NOTHING but learning things from that
> book, it actually explained what functions, subs etc are, what control
> attributes and GUIs are... I thought I was so good before but I knew
NOTHING
> that this book was teaching me...
>
> One thing I must stress to every new programmer, programming takes utter
> dedication, if you can not be bothered with it, turn back now...
>
> Anyway, I kept learning and learning, bots were the key to me learning VB,
I
> made everything with it, database bots, drawing bots, the works, being
> reassured by friends that I could make it and always having the fallback
of
> chuckling at the person who taught me almost everything else I know about
it
> (Baron) when he took out all of AWGZ with a PK bot on eject by accident...
>
> Now I know I was bad... but some people out there are worse... telegrams
> such as 'how do I put text in a text box'... a person can explain to you
how
> to put text in a text box... but thats all, but if you LEARN how about
> control attributes and properties, you will be able to handle everything!
> Background colours, fonts etc...
>
> But you have to keep commiting yourself to it.. never give up and seek
help
> from people when you need it, but don't be a idiot and try and get *all*
the
> solutions from other people, its what I tried doing with Baron.. it dosent
> work... you end up getting more and more confused....
>
> But keep at it, and remember you have to LEARN... get books, read
> websites... its all good...
>
> Eventually I got to the point (World Core 5) where VB could no longer
handle
> what I needed to do with it... and that was the end of VB for me... now
Ive
> started all over again (Although this time I promised myself I wouldent
> hassle anyone!)... And hey, look where its got me. Im lead programmer for
an
> AW distributor :)
>
> - Mark
>
>
|
Aug 17, 2003, 7:36pm
thanks... lol
[View Quote]"strike rapier" <strike at Rapiercom.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3f3fe475$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> if RC is null... everything is OK and your doing something else wrong...
>
> - Mark
>
> ".duo." <ncommons at comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:3f3fd971$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Aug 18, 2003, 11:57pm
for me it is, rofl.
[View Quote]"kah" <kah at kahnews.cjb.net> wrote in message
news:Xns93DB946799C40kahatkahnewsdotcjbdo at 64.94.241.201...
> ".duo." <ncommons at comcast.net> wrote in
> news:3f3ff543$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com:
>
>
> Just do a full login procedure instead of the QuickStart procedure. It's
> not hard at all.
>
> KAH
|
Aug 18, 2003, 11:57pm
Then where is it? And why are you always so mean? >:-P
[View Quote]"joeman" <john at fakeplastic.com> wrote in message
news:3f3ffb04$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Uh, perhaps you should do a little more research... There *is* an SDK for
> java, at least there was a version ago, I see no reason why it wouldn't be
> updated.
>
> -Joe
>
> ".duo." <ncommons at comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:3f3f7166 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> with
Linux,
> through
> VB.
code,
> more
> dlls
way
> exact
> to
> All
joeman at bootdown.com
> seakrit
needed
> even
job
> hard
high
> two
>
>
|
Aug 26, 2003, 7:16pm
Trying to get rid of linking errors, heh heh heh
[View Quote]"john" <john at 3d-reality.com> wrote in message
news:3f4ba6fa at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Lol
>
> ~John
>
>
|
Aug 27, 2003, 11:03am
Umm... no dumbass I mean the linking errors not related to the AW files.
--
-.Duo. (342836)
[View Quote]"strike rapier" <strike at Rapiercom.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3f4bd03c at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> No... all the programmers realised you have to include the *.lib files in
> the compiler options as aw.lib or aw_static.lib...
>
> - Mark
>
> ".duo." <ncommons at comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:3f4bce28 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
|