|
dotar sojat // User Search
dotar sojat // User Search
Mar 20, 2002, 4:24pm
Thank you for the info.
[View Quote]calpantera <bill at activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:3c9895c2$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> We are more than happy to say. All you had to do was ask. :) The new
> location is in Boston and is going to be fed bandwidth by Internap
> http://www.internap.com They will be providing us with two 100mbps feeds
> intelligently routed through 9 backbone carriers. We anticipate better
> connectivity worldwide for world servers as well as end clients. Please
> visit their website for more information on their P-NAPSM.
>
> Bill
>
> "dotar sojat" <dotar at ramcell.net> wrote in message
> news:3c982903 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> universe
building
> moving
server.
> worlds
> unnoticed
> place
> first
> have
> email
>
>
|
Mar 21, 2002, 5:04pm
Also if you would quyuote the entire sentance it refers to those who fill
out this handy dandy little form on that page.
[View Quote]binarybud <lmauk at traverse.net> wrote in message
news:3c99e8d6 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> This is a NEW Rule and it applys ONLY to NEW cits. NOT current cits.
so were's the lie?
> They have to delete anyones property that does not stick around more than
30 days...sounds quite reasonable to me. ALL the old
> stuff stays...unless requested deletion is issued......then normal
channels are taken.
>
> keep digging you'll find something to satisfy ya...:)
> though i doubt it....;)
>
>
>
>
> "subdelta" <daniel at att.net> wrote in message
news:3C99E00C.397CCD13 at att.net...
>
>
|
Mar 22, 2002, 12:50am
Good point Brant
[View Quote]brant <awteen at shoemakervillage.org> wrote in message
news:3c9a8999$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I don't care what AW's been doing - you still use manners because it's the
> right thing to do. Would you reply if someone sent you an E-Mail calling
> you incompetent and a complete idiot? Thus, on this particular incident
> (I'm not saying anything about any other incidents), I'll have to side
with
> AW. The original letter was very rude and I don't blame ENZO for not
> replying. Were I in his shoes, I certainly wouldn't have.
>
> Perhaps if we all worked on basic communication skills, there wouldn't be
so
> many miscommunications around here.
>
> -Brant
>
> "pc hamster" <pchamster at email.msn.com> wrote in message
> news:3c9a5de1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> itself
> talking
> talk
art
> or
> and
>
>
|
Mar 26, 2002, 6:57am
Get a bot and it will tell you the name to match any number.
[View Quote]pc hamster <pchamster at email.msn.com> wrote in message
news:3ca035b4$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Hi everyone:
>
> "zeo toxion" <cozmo at activeworlds.com> wrote in message
> news:3c9fb274$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
> Touche my friend. :-) However though I *do* believe the keywords were
> "punk a**". Specifically I was referring to those teenagers who choose to
> spend more time defacing and destroying land or property rather than
> CONTRIBUTING to IMPROVE the land. I think it's safe to say with a fair
> amount of certainty that not all teenagers in the AW Community fall into
> this category.
>
> With that said, would the owner of cit no. 58751 PLEASE remove your signs
in
> front of the Hamsterville Police Station at 4968N 130E. The point in
those
> signs is WELL taken and as you will notice, construction of the police
> station HAS begun, however I need those signs removed so I can function.
I
> will also begin work on City Hall and the Town Square hopefully tomorrow
as
> well (PLEASE DO **NOT** MOVE THE SIGNS OVER THERE!!). I hate to give out
> cit numbers like this, but since I don't know who this number belongs
> to.....
>
> Also, will the owner of the same cit number please remove the "p" in
> "Hampsterville" in the Free Speech area too?? This would be much
> appreciated. :-)
>
>
>
|
Mar 31, 2002, 4:18pm
Ummmm a question? How does this pertain to most of the NG's you crossposted
to? It should have been put in WORLDBUILDERS and thats it!
[View Quote]strike rapier <strike at rapiercom.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3ca705f1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> WARNING - Could anyone hosting any object path change its password!
>
> 67 Object Path Keys Compromised - Everything from AW to the Gor worlds,
> change your OP passwords NOW!
>
> The source of the codes has been destroyed - Anyone found using the PW's
> without the owners permission will have the owner and AWC to answer to!
>
> Once again - Change your PW's now - I cannot reviel who is on the list,
the
> safest bet is to completly change every object path. Andras has a tool
> available - www.andras.net.
>
> - Mark
>
>
|
Mar 31, 2002, 4:29pm
And they cannot find out about it from ONE NG?
[View Quote]strike rapier <strike at rapiercom.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3ca753c4 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Because its imporant everyone knows so if they own a OP, they change it
> asap.
>
>
> "dotar sojat" <dotar at ramcell.net> wrote in message
> news:3ca752ee at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> crossposted
worlds,
PW's
to!
list,
>
>
|
Mar 31, 2002, 5:00pm
I still think cross posting was not nessasary in the least.
[View Quote]strike rapier <strike at rapiercom.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3ca7569c at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> No, it is essential everyone who could possably have OP knows. I have
> posted in every NG on both main AW type servers. As you know by now (i
hope)
> the passwords are confirmed as compromised and it is essential that
> everyones knows so they can change them. So unless u have AWLD #1 rights
and
> can tell everyone by using the universe welcome message. Id apreciate just
> going with this and just changing the PW on a OP if you own 1. Thankyou :)
>
> -Mark
>
> Someone called Dotar wrote this:
> --------------------------------------------------------
> And they cannot find out about it from ONE NG?
> strike rapier <strike at rapiercom.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:3ca753c4 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> worlds,
> PW's
> to!
> list,
tool
>
>
>
|
Apr 1, 2002, 7:52am
*grins at wings* I have to agree I belive it was all blown out of proportion
as well. Barsoom has it's password, and I will be hornswaggled if I am going
to spend another 2 weeks uploading files just to change it unless I "have"
to.
[View Quote]wings0nite <Irene at ilschaft.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1711ae8c16ff59a98969b at news.activeworlds.com...
> In article <3ca79826 at server1.Activeworlds.com>, baronjutter at shaw.ca
> says...
ask
they
want
>
>
> WOO WOO! Hi there, neighbor :-) I live in Happy Peace Bunny Friendship
> Land too! I am on Loving Lane, where abouts is your place?
>
> I'm sorry but I am not changing my password to make a couple of kids
> happy that they freaked out a bunch of world owners by pretending to have
> hacked their passwords. You have been found out kids, so why don't you
> call a few of your neighbors and ask them if their refrigerator is
> running and suggest that they catch it?
>
> Bruce, I respect your opinion but I think this whole thread was the
> genius of 2 kids who wanted 15 minutes of fame.
>
>
> Wings0nite
>
>
>
>
>
>
|
Apr 26, 2002, 6:05am
Well I think yours looked great jerme, but then again I was nto the one who
had to decide.
[View Quote]jerme <JerMe at nc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:3cc8c57f$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Well.. When you said "new" I was expecting something a little *newer* than
> that... That was so easy to slop together I could almost cry!
>
>
> Just so everyone can see... This was my entry:
http://207.59.10.4/cyawards/
> Please tell me what you think...
>
>
> --
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Jeremy Booker
> JTech Web Systems
> (www.JTechWebSystems.com -- Coming Soon)
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> "alphabit phalpha" <alphabit at swbell.net> wrote in message
> news:3cc8bcf5$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> forum:)
you
> to
>
>
|
Apr 26, 2002, 6:06am
I disagree baro. To be effective a website must load fast and grab
attention. jerme's did both of those.
[View Quote]baro <baronjutter at shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:3cc8f2f1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Yours has animated buttons, frivolous! Web pages should only have images
> that are 100% necessary and or help with navigation. Could be worse,
could
> have had Java or flash.. or.. or pop ups! You kids and your fancy
graphics!
>
> How's about plain text black and white with no images.
>
> Heck how about simple randomly generated webpages that display random
award
> "winners" ? Would solve many steps.
>
>
|
Apr 26, 2002, 10:26pm
It never seemed to cause a problem before baro.
[View Quote]baro <baronjutter at shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:3cc9ad13$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> uh oh. That could be make it just as problematic as voting for the
winners.
> You'll have the same popularity contests have before, but this time groups
> of friends all submitting a person from their group not on the grounds of
> their skilled and objective judgeing, but on the grounds of their friends
> chosings the winners.
>
>
|
May 7, 2002, 6:08am
And maybe with this new tech they are supposedly gettign that 100 meg OP
will crunch down ever smaller. Well one can hope anyway.
[View Quote]carlbanks <Virtualcarlbanks at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3cd6e28a at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Well some people have 100 MB ops.
>
> "binarybud" <leom at knorrinteractive.com> wrote in message
> news:3cd6de34$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
for
we
Days!
a
> the
what
> technology
> nil
> technology
> be
> because
> to
with
near
> time.
awc's
>
>
|
May 10, 2002, 2:48am
It will bounce you around no stranger than the same thing does in Quake.
[View Quote]dion <GovDion at subdimension.com> wrote in message
news:3cdb06c5$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I'm wondering how well this slide detection is going to work. For weird
> shaped objects it might bounce you around strangely...
>
> "zeo toxion" <cozmo at activeworlds.com> wrote in message
> news:3cdafd56$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
the
should
before
cache
> bring
> just
>
>
|
May 10, 2002, 6:00am
I dunno bout you but I have been doign mass deletions in exactly this way
since the advent of 3.0, so I am unsure how come you say it cannot be done?
> One feature *I'd* like to see (BTW....Why wasn't this thread cross-posted
> onto WISHLIST until now?? Found that to be kinda strange) is mass
DELETION
> capabilities. It's funny though how we can just simply hit CTRL+INSERT
and
> not only duplicate but also place an object in sequential place, but yet
you
> can't DELETE objects in the same manner.
>
> Is it just me not hitting the right keys (like SHIFT+DELETE) or is this
just
> yet another MUCH NEEDED improvement left out of 3.3???
>
|