binarybud // User Search

binarybud // User Search

1  2  3  4  5  6  ...  33  |  

Question...

Jun 24, 2003, 1:49pm
:)

I think you want a FORM thats invisible along with using the "Command$" command.....to read commandline arguments...

strArgs = Split(Command$, " ")

HTH
Leo :)




[View Quote]

Question...

Jun 24, 2003, 2:44pm
LOL "consoling" means a bunch of different things to different people i guess huh? lol




[View Quote]

N,S,E,W module

Jul 10, 2003, 11:08am
I find this totally amusing......:) thanx for the laugh


[View Quote]

Nox 3.4 (and 3.5)

Jan 6, 2004, 5:41pm
That was a rhetorical question Brock..(hence the LOL)..The only stupid things I see around here is your impish responses.

sheeesh
Leo :)

ps sorry people I couldn't resist .

[View Quote]

virus alert (cross-posted to all groups)

Feb 20, 2004, 3:46pm
hey there Builderz..... I think that Bowen was actually referring to a "spoofed" header with this last comment:
" Nice try though Matt."

Leo :)

ps; #1 rule NEVER open attachments unless it's someone you are EXPECTING an attachment from. AND you trust them to take care of their PC on their own....AND your prepared to lose everything on your hard drive and reformat it tomorrow....LOL





[View Quote]

a bit offtopic but maybe someone can help

Aug 10, 2004, 4:31pm
which is why a lot of your posts seem .... dream-like ......lol


[View Quote]

a list

Oct 4, 2001, 12:12pm
"Plugins are for web browsers that load INSIDE THE BROWSER AND DO NOT LOAD
AN EXTERNAL PROGRAM LIKE AW."

LOL heheheheheh ok yea right..... LOL Like you can't have a
Plug-in in an executable lol.






[View Quote]

a list

Oct 5, 2001, 11:55am
talk about a dim wit as an OCX....the AWC control IS a plug-in for the
IE browser. even though it contains most the code for the AW browser, it's
still a browser "plug-in" :) Eep, i do not think you have the computer
skills nor experience to call ME computer illiterate..... take a chill
pill sport.

oh and where in our wonderful english dictionary is the word "fuckshits"
LOL you freak'in bonehead....LOL get a clue. I Love it when you swear
like that..... LOL it shows we are hitting the right buttons on your
forehead...;)





[View Quote]

Re: plagarism (was Re: saving cell data)

Sep 24, 2001, 2:02pm
all bow to the almighty Eepster It seems he is responsible for ALL human
knowledge from the start of time....LOL especially if it's 3D knowledge
LOL

all stand and give him the clap!

Leo :) aka BinaryBud

If yer so damn good with computers, how come you don't program them, nor
repair them?
You just TALK about them too much......for not really knowing.......hehehe



[View Quote]

Re: plagarism (was Re: saving cell data)

Sep 24, 2001, 5:54pm
i can handle myself hehehhe oh and define "new user" lol i was here
way before you were...;)

Just can't keep my mouth shut forever...:)

Leo :) aka BinaryBud


[View Quote]

A few requests...

Oct 18, 2001, 7:15pm
your a bonehead these were all pretty good ideas and suggestions.....
just because YOU do not see the use in them does NOT make them "no good"
get a brain Mr. complainer...lol
troll accepted.....hehehe


[View Quote]

Re: From Eep - 3D Analyzer

Jun 14, 2002, 10:58am
lol twas thinking the same thing hehehehe


[View Quote]

Woah nice new feature.

Jul 1, 2002, 7:10pm
sounds nice....looks nice..... but once you have it first thing you'll say
is.....can i shut it off..... WITH your chat in it, it pretty much kills
the beautiful 3D window.....not bad for a couple of avatars talking but
get in a GZ area and get people talking and wow...talk about clutter.

IMHO
Leo :)




[View Quote]

Woah nice new feature.

Jul 2, 2002, 4:52pm
your spreading rumor now. :) and besides why is that BAD? lol

[View Quote]

annual (or so) AW improvements site post

Jul 17, 2002, 3:25pm
All right! now YOUR catching on to him. He just wants to be thought of
as a genius.... Please note Eep's reply to Jerme's post.....lol HE even
thinks so!.....lol

Leo :)

oh and for a totally "slacking" company AWLD sure has improved a bunch in
the last couple years.
Considering they only had ONE fulltime programmer working on the dern thing!

[View Quote]

annual (or so) AW improvements site post

Jul 22, 2002, 1:32pm
no doubt about it..... but as in cooking.....presentation is 90% of the game.

Leo :)


[View Quote]

Extended Viewing Range

Jul 17, 2002, 3:18pm
one thing IS consistant.....YOUR ignorance of programming dude.....also
your "views" of respect.
When you garner YOUR respect, then maybe someone will give you all the
facts...Roland was just giving you what he thought your pea brain could
handle without having to explain every freaking detail to you.....get over
it Eep...your not a programmer, and you should NOT be discussing programming
issures...your just lost in this regard...;)

Leo :)


[View Quote]

Another idea.. read.. its kewl!

Aug 12, 2002, 12:53pm
ignorance is bliss hey Bowen?

LOL

[View Quote]

Another idea.. read.. its kewl!

Aug 12, 2002, 3:15pm
I was speaking of YOUR ignorance.....you might wanna mellow out before the word gets out to everyone!



[View Quote]

Telegram Bombing

Sep 18, 2002, 12:44pm
and as usual your prolly wrong on BOTH accounts.

Look at the question mark as strickly an "anti-social" behaviour....;)

Leo :)


[View Quote]

EMAIL TO AW

Sep 23, 2002, 6:08pm
LOL great info...:) that's what i like.....a good rumor mill....lol




[View Quote]

EMAIL TO AW

Sep 24, 2002, 12:10pm
What does MM have to do with anything?
She is NOT an AW employee. (Officially)
ya gotta love those rumors.

Leo :) aka BinaryBud


[View Quote]

EMAIL TO AW

Sep 24, 2002, 3:46pm
Sorry but she is not on "staff"........home or no home. She is independant.
You need to understand what that means too...:)

Leo :)



[View Quote]

EMAIL TO AW

Sep 25, 2002, 11:22am
She is not an employee of AWI period.

Leo :)


[View Quote]

EMAIL TO AW

Sep 25, 2002, 11:29am
In Fact :

"Kellie (MountainMyst) is not and never has been an employee of Activeworlds Inc., nor a manager and does not represent the company in any such capacity."

Notice that is quoted.....:)

Leo :)



[View Quote]

Re: Water is not accurate

Oct 16, 2002, 4:11pm
In so many words your nuts....there is NO BODY of WATER on this earth that you can see as far under water as you can out of... period. and get off the "bending light" that is called reflection and if it's reflecting it's reflecting off of something.

"Water just refracts it at a different angle." LOL BB hands Bowen a fence post.

"Now, if you're, again, talking about natural, earth water... that is something different from pure HOH." LOL duh

This is what WE are talking about yes Realistic water effects....sheeesh stop arguing in your own head dude.

The distance you can see(clearity), has to do with the density of the air/water.

"But I can see nearly as far in water as I can out of water (don't confuse your eyes with mine). "

*nearly as far* lol ok this makes our point right here

and this has nothing to do with eyes...yours nor mine.

use hardware to do the measuring.....:) it all comes out in the wash.

Leo :)


[View Quote]

Re: Water is not accurate

Oct 17, 2002, 12:48pm
Show me your scientific proof. And remember if your gonna pull the "pureified water" card that the air will also be "purified" and still you will see farther in the air....can you explain why this is a FACT? I doubt it. I have proof from experience....many more years than you do...:)

Leo :)

Swimming pool? LOL sheeesh like that makes any difference. ok let me try this one on ya.......your telling me if we had an ocean of "purified water", that you would have light clear down to the bottom of the ocean? Not a chance.... and ya know why? Cause light travels through air further than through water.....are you getting this? hehehehe LOL knock knock......lights on....but nobody is home.

[View Quote]

Re: Water is not accurate

Oct 17, 2002, 3:44pm
Bowen, YOUR WRONG! Go back to class and learn something. sheeesh i cannot believe schools are not better preparing our young.

Next reply from you needs to be some proof of your dreams..:)

Leo :) aka BinaryBud

ps; sheeesh quit trying to fit the scene with what you want to be your answer... we are talking about seeing distance. remember this started with the visibility under water in AW and we are trying to mimic the REAL WORLD..... go figure...:)



[View Quote]

Re: Water is not accurate

Oct 17, 2002, 5:40pm
gawd shakes head.... your pathetic son.

/me backs up truck to unload more fence posts..... and a couple of door knobs to keep you company. (prolly to young to catch what this means).


[View Quote]

Re: Water is not accurate

Oct 17, 2002, 7:18pm
Hands KAH a couple fence posts too. I said nothing about ignorance....just pointing out a lack of common sense. and i do not have an never said i have all the answers in the universe...but i sure the hell have this one pegged....:)

And bite me with the maturity issue :) dam mouthy punks.

Leo :)

[View Quote]

1  2  3  4  5  6  ...  33  |  
Awportals.com is a privately held community resource website dedicated to Active Worlds.
Copyright (c) Mark Randall 2006 - 2024. All Rights Reserved.
Awportals.com   ·   ProLibraries Live   ·   Twitter   ·   LinkedIn