|
binarybud // User Search
binarybud // User Search
Oct 23, 2002, 11:17am
http://www.leomauk.com/touristworlds.htm
[View Quote]"jerme" <JerMe101 at bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:3db610cc$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Don't bet on it.... Take it to the wishlist hun. They don't care, nor are they going to listen.
>
> --
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Jeremy Booker - Owner
> JTech Web Systems
> www.JTechWebSystems.com
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> "Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough
> trouble of its own." -Mathew 5:34
> "jamey" <jamey at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message news:3db5eaf3 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Oct 23, 2002, 11:19am
With your sharp tongue, you'll be lucky if they don't filter you.
Your a beta tester? speaking of incompetence....:)
Leo :) lol
[View Quote]"jerme" <JerMe101 at bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:3db610cc$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Don't bet on it.... Take it to the wishlist hun. They don't care, nor are they going to listen.
>
> --
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Jeremy Booker - Owner
> JTech Web Systems
> www.JTechWebSystems.com
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> "Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough
> trouble of its own." -Mathew 5:34
> "jamey" <jamey at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message news:3db5eaf3 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Oct 23, 2002, 1:34pm
I said nothng about banning and quite frankly his comments were of no use to the dev team.... actually more "destructive than constructive" comments. My point is if you do not like what they are doing then the beta team is not where you need to be anyhow. And i would'nt be surprised if they'd ban him...who needs to spend time dealing with crap like that anyhow..... they have lots of work to do...:) We're (the beta testers) supposed to be on their team....;)
Leo :)
ps; It's not about the post about them not caring...it's the tag line he put in calling them "incompetent".
[View Quote]"kah" <kah at kahnews.cjb.net> wrote in message news:Xns92B0A5ADAFB5Dkahatkahnewsdotcjbdo at 64.94.241.201...
> "binarybud" <leom at knorrinteractive.com> wrote in
> news:3db6a1f1$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com:
>
>
> Aren't you being a bit over-sensitive there? I doubt they'd ban him for
> saying they don't care (which seems to be the truth anyway)...
>
> KAH
|
Oct 23, 2002, 7:04pm
Like you have a clue how commercial software is developed....and businesses are run.........sheeesh
Why don't you go check out that Micky-D's job.
[View Quote]"jerme" <JerMe101 at bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:3db70d99 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> You seem to be of the same mistaken opinion as the rest of those lazy..... nevermind.... 999 told me
> the reason they do not release a *nix version is "it would just be one more thing to track." I can
> understand that, as I see the dev team is a very busy bunch. However, that's a sorry excuse for
> something of this nature.
>
> What if there's a problem with the *nix port of the server; some bug specific to only that build. So
> then, after the beta is over, they'll release an untested (relatively untested, compared to the
> windows server) build for production use. That's dangerous... And that is specifically what the beta
> period is for by definition alone. Both builds need to be released so they can both be tested in
> tandem. As programmers it is part of their job to do that. They need to do their damn jobs instead
> of crying and saying "we don't want to because it'll be too much work". If it's too much work then
> find another job.
>
> The beta is for testing the browser and server *before* they are released as production builds. It
> only makes logical sense to test both windows and *nix versions of the server. Creating and tracking
> a *nix build would not be that much more trouble. The effort would be worth the better product in
> the end.
>
> -Jeremy
>
>
> --
> The McDonald's in town is hiring....
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Jeremy Booker - Owner
> JTech Web Systems
> www.JTechWebSystems.com
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> "Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough
> trouble of its own." -Mathew 5:34
> "agent1" <webmaster at shatteredplattersDOTcom> wrote in message
> news:3db6c0b4 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> there will be a *nix server.
>
>
|
Oct 23, 2002, 7:37pm
LOL ok 'nuff said...
[View Quote]"jerme" <JerMe101 at bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:3db71185$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
> Sorry, I already have an application in at a local manufacturing plant. Database administration / IT
> assistant
>
> --
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Jeremy Booker - Owner
> JTech Web Systems
> www.JTechWebSystems.com
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> "Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough
> trouble of its own." -Mathew 5:34
> "binarybud" <leom at knorrinteractive.com> wrote in message news:3db70ec9$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> run.........sheeesh
> told me
> can
> build. So
> beta
> instead
> then
> It
> tracking
> in
> enough
> ready,
> world
> *nix??
>
>
|
Nov 1, 2002, 6:58pm
LOL Mark you'd be a lot further ahead if you didn't think outloud....lol
Leo :)
[View Quote]"strike rapier" <strike at rapiercom.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message news:3dc2ea95 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Lets Review:
>
> 1) I am on Beta
> 2) Please direct your attension towards the following:
>
> - Mark
> Only kiddin Will :)
>
> I believe Young Shamus is called will.. or that could be 9 9 9 :s Im not sure..
>
> Thankyou for your time :)
>
> - Mark
> "elyk" <KFoerst at telocity.com> wrote in message news:3dc1b813$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Dec 11, 2002, 1:24pm
hey Leave my stash outta this...It's secure, nobody dips in it but me......;)
[View Quote]"goober king" <gooberking at utn.cjb.net> wrote in message news:3DF6A2D1.1050100 at utn.cjb.net...
> *blink* Bowen, are you actually getting pissed off over a discussion
> about viruses?! Have you been dipping into BinaryBud's stash or something?
>
> How about you go outside, take a deep breath, go for a walk, and maybe
> meet some new people while you're at it. It'll do your body, and the
> viruses inside 'em, some good.
>
> bowen wrote:
>
>
> --
> Goober King
> Translation: You people *really* need to get out more!
> gooberking at utn.cjb.net
>
|
Dec 16, 2002, 7:12pm
or the one about the two "Morons" that were on the river....one on each bank. The first one yells across to the second one...."HEY...HOW DO YOU GET TO THE OTHER SIDE?!!!".
The second one thinks for a minute then yells back......
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
"YOUR ALREADY THERE!"
Leo :)
Dec 16, 2002, 8:11pm
hey! leave my Grandma outta this!
[View Quote]"stecloud" <stecloud at fsmail.net> wrote in message news:3dfe4c16 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Hehe good one, apart from the grammar :P
>
>
> "binarybud" <leom at knorrinteractive.com> wrote in message
> news:3dfe41c4$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> bank. The first one yells across to the second one...."HEY...HOW DO YOU GET
> TO THE OTHER SIDE?!!!".
>
>
|
Dec 17, 2002, 7:30pm
wow, dude, I want some of what your on....;)
[View Quote]"shred" <shred at myrealbox.com> wrote in message news:3dff9049 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> The glass is a broken collection of jagged, razor-sharp shards laced with high concentrations of cyanide and arsenic. Whatever liquid it once contained has long since seeped through the many cracks and breaks in the structure of the glass. The glass now contains an infestation of various forms of insect life, most of these dead and rotting after being killed by the aforementioned poisons.
>
> The glass is currently half full of the said dead insect bodies. The bacterial life forms that are causing the insect bodies to decay were not taken in to measurement.
>
> stecloud wrote:
>
|
Dec 17, 2002, 5:09pm
looks like an Email harvesting scheme....in sheeps clothing...;)
[View Quote]"john" <john at chatzone3d.co.uk> wrote in message news:3dff720f at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> http://www.gamecentrix.co.uk/projectpopcorn/start.asp?refID=2
>
>
>
|
Dec 17, 2002, 6:37pm
but you can protect yourselves in the NG...... these companys set up these web sites JUST to get email addys....they are what make the money(address lists).....;) ask your "friend" what his motivation is...:)
[View Quote]"john" <john at chatzone3d.co.uk> wrote in message news:3dff7f79 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> BTW, when you have an email address for five years (like mine), you'll end
> up with enough spammers to last a life time anyway :-)
>
> What do you call AW NGs if not a harvesting scheme, any spammer could make a
> prog to dl the info on who posted it. lol
>
> "johnny b" <jbitt2ATjuno.com> wrote in message
> news:3dff7901$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> lousy spammers.......
> news:3dff767b$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> news:3dff720f at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Dec 17, 2002, 7:59pm
wow John are you listening here?..... that is a totally different thing....although harvesting could be underneath...and used later as a "revenue generator" .....?
Did you talk to your friend? Is he planning on selling the addresses? Some companys do and some do not. And they usually post their intentions but not always....lol "buyer beware" comes to mind..;) If he is not going to use them, then he would do good to post that info..;)
[View Quote]"john" <john at chatzone3d.co.uk> wrote in message news:3dff9b7f at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> And what about www.3d-reality.com?
> "binarybud" <leom at knorrinteractive.com> wrote in message
> news:3dff8b00$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> these web sites JUST to get email addys....they are what make the
> money(address lists).....;) ask your "friend" what his motivation is...:)
> news:3dff7f79 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> end
> make a
> gazillion
>
>
|
Jan 16, 2003, 2:33pm
LOL good find good to know he's still kicking......someone lol
http://makeashorterlink.com/?U23A24D13
This link is for all you Cut&Paste disabled users...:)
[View Quote]"bowen" <thisguyrules at 7k2.4mg.com.ANTISPAM> wrote in message news:3e26b9a0$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> If the link is broken up, sorry, I didn't feel like making it shorter. It's still
> quite funny to read. :) I think you all know how to cut and paste anyways.
>
> http://groups.google.ca/groups?hl=fr&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&newwindow=1&safe=off&selm=
> Xns91F868EC5AAE3knight37m%40216.148.53.81
>
> --Bowen--
>
>
|
Jan 28, 2003, 5:44pm
but.....but........but Eep deserves it!
[View Quote]"swe" <swe at swe-e.com> wrote in message news:3e36db1b at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> because, he gets on my nerves! and i really hate people who speak about
> others when they are not present to defend thierselfs. nothing pisses me off
> more then that. and well, goober king has been doing it to Eep.
>
> "neocube o" <majmatrixx at excite.com> wrote in message
> news:3e36d7e5 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> so
>
>
|
Feb 13, 2003, 4:27pm
I wonder if he does not mean to say "goals" or "gameplan". Just where is it your headed with the system? I't's kinda like.... if ya don't know where your going......then..... how can you figure out how to get there. type thing.
[View Quote]"e n z o" <enzo at activeworlds.com> wrote in message news:3e4be00e$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> What policy do you want to see?
>
> E
>
>
> "count dracula" <dracula at netsonic.fi> wrote in message
> news:3e48e4c6$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> arguments
> customers
> me
> it
> ideas
>
>
|
Feb 20, 2003, 6:34pm
throws MrBruce some "hat tipping respect" :)
[View Quote]"mrbruce" <A1CTWorld at aol.com> wrote in message news:3e53374a at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> LOL Good one! =)
> MrBruce.
> "light form" <Light_Form at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:3e528ca3 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Feb 27, 2003, 12:18pm
WOW This looks pretty good Sidris...... We need to start brainstorming now!
These are all great ideas that CAN be implemented.
Leo :)
[View Quote]"sidris" <sidris at dslextreme.com> wrote in message news:3e5dad90$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I accept your apology, BinaryBud.
>
> I, for one, do not accept that there is not an amenable and probably easily
> executable solution to the concerns regarding world content.
>
> I understand Bud's point that the awards should be totally independent of
> AWI for the sake of legal culpability. I agree. It's stupid for anyone to
> be placed at harmful risk for the Cy awards.
>
> What I'm about to suggest is a compromise. The compromise of greater
> effort. Leave the risk and the adult content and things some may not want
> to see right where they are. I don't believe the undesirable things need to
> be seen at all.
>
> Instead of having the public and judging committees go to the nominated
> worlds, instead of risking exposure to undesirable content, instead of
> excluding a huge, important part of AW from participation, how difficult
> could it be to have the nominations, the very best, come to the judging
> process? Like a Worlds Fair.
>
> The Panama-Pacific International Exposition of 1915... An entire city of
> great palaces and pavillions, courtyards, agricultural extravaganzas,
> sculpture, racetracks and amusements were constructed within the ten mile
> square city of San Francisco. Mega tons of iron and lumber, raw earth, even
> giant dismantled portions of some of the world's largest, greatest and most
> beautiful constructions were brought in from all over the globe, by ship and
> rail and beast. What's more, this incredible feat of human will and
> devotion to excellence was done only eight years after San Francisco had
> been razed to the ground by the worst earthquakes to ever hit the North
> American continent.
>
> No shift of responsibility. All of it was responsibility accepted. And
> challenge and effort. The world came to San Francisco to enjoy the very
> best the world had to offer. The world came to witness POSSIBILITY.
>
> Possibility made possible courtesy of existing technology.
>
> So, this is my offering. Learn how to use bots, find someone who knows how,
> scale down your entries and bring the best all together in one place. One
> great event in an area of total acceptibility.
>
> Make it possible courtesy of our existing technology.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "cy awards" <cyawards at awcommunity.org> wrote in message
> news:3e567f78$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> pages
> www.awcommunity.org/cyawards
> and
>
>
|
Feb 28, 2003, 11:49am
hmmm Back to what Sidris suggested,..... We could use technology to do most of this...:) the emailing, the moving and submissions of objects/avatars,.... and even some builds. But, I sure can see the problem with the "world" entries...but then again if we use technology for the other stuff...handling the world entries might be a little easier...:)
my2cents
Leo :)
[View Quote]"johnny b" <jbitt2ATjunoDOTcom> wrote in message news:3e5ef60c$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Agreed...... gotta hire her a Spammer ;O) they're good at that kinda stuff
> JB
>
>
> "sw chris" <chrisw10 at skywalkeronline.net> wrote in message news:3e5eddfe$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Feb 24, 2003, 3:25pm
negative negative negative spam......
It's way to easy this day in age to just sit in your armchair and spout negative politics when none is needed.
Your way too ignorant for "us" to begin listening to your rants.
Where were you when this issue was discussed last fall? "We" are sick of your types ruining the
community atmosphere around here. Knock it off....If you have a better idea, then do
something about it instead of cutting down everyone else when they try. Take your negativity
and start another universe for it...."we" don't want it here.
The only "crock of crap" I see is your very words.
Leo :)
[View Quote]"sidris" <sidris at dslextreme.com> wrote in message news:3e5a4fe1$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Interesting that "We" rushed to publish these new rules yet the rest of the
> site remains totally incomplete. This gives me a very indelible impression
> that "We" is more concered with enforcement issues than the issue of
> recognition of excellence for which the Cy is supposed to stand.
>
> In their post here, why does "We" even bother to acknowledge the beauty of
> adult worlds and how wonderful the people in these worlds are if these
> worlds are excluded from participating in a COMMUNITY event?
>
> If adult worlds are not recognized for their efforts and contributions by
> the governors of an event which is supposed to be for all of the AW
> community this would seem to me that such worlds do not even exist to the
> "We" of the awards committee. Hence, the apology "We" offers for
> nonexistent worlds must be absolutely insincere, just a self-defensive
> conciliatory blow off. A feeble appeasement made by a bunch of
> self-righteous, moralistic paranoiac prudes.
>
> The Cy Awards, most often regarded as a self-serving sham for a very narrow
> clique of inner circle elite, has finally hit rock bottom with their
> self-imposed rule of non-recognition for worlds which comprise a significant
> portion of the AW *community*. Instead of calling this the Cy Award, a
> more apt name might be the Junior Cy awards. Or how about the "Good Clean
> Cy" awards?
>
> What a crock of crap.
>
> Sidris
>
>
> "cy awards" <cyawards at awcommunity.org> wrote in message
> news:3e568bf3$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> this
> will
>
>
|
Feb 24, 2003, 3:40pm
I think your exactly right with this Goober.
Don't give the crybabies a chance to have a say.
If they do not like the CY's then they do not have to
have anything to do with them. They can just ignore them.
Leo :)
ps; Better even..... start their own awards and see how THEY like it when others pitch a fit over THEIR ideas.
[View Quote]"goober king" <gooberking at utn.cjb.net> wrote in message news:3E5A56DA.40008 at utn.cjb.net...
> The reason that "We" posted the rules first was because that's what
> *everyone else* was so concerned with. Maybe if everyone had stopped all
> their incessant whining about insignificant rules for a relatively (in
> the grand scheme of things) insignificant event, we would never have
> reached this point in the first place.
>
> To be honest, I think the main problem with the CY Awards is that it's
> not exclusive *enough*. By that I mean, by giving the general community
> a voice in how things are run and who gets in, all that can lead to is
> bickering about rules, who was more deserving of a nom, why this or that
> shouldn't get a CY, ad naseum.
>
> But if it was just Bit and/or the CY Committee calling the shots on
> rules, noms, and even the winners (much like the Academy for the
> Oscars), then perhaps we'd actually have a legitimate Awards ceremony
> rather than something that everyone (it seems) thinks of as a total joke.
>
> sidris wrote:
>
> --
> Goober King
> A total joke
> gooberking at utn.cjb.net
>
|
Feb 25, 2003, 11:37am
Of course your twisting my comments but thats ok cause I know exactly what your up to.
Listen ....if you don't like the CY awards make your own don't constantly knock the people that are TRYING to reward others for their work. Remember Sidris it was the CY's last year that accepted the adult content and the COMMUNITY that did not....so what gives? I have no agenda and am associated with any one on these issues... these are my own observations.
I think you are correct in that the CY's are NOT a community event. It's a private event aimed at recognizing the community.
Leo :) aka BinaryBud
Ps; sorry for getting snippy wit ya..... I just get tired of the flat out negativeness.....if your so hot about this subject ...then do something besides criticize everyone that is trying.
[View Quote]"sidris" <sidris at dslextreme.com> wrote in message news:3e5ad58a at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> But what is there to be concerned about? Why all this alarm about
> adult-content inacceptibility when the solution is as easy as "caveat
> emptor'? Completely prohibiting the participation of a huge and
> artistically worthy segment of the AW *community* negates the idea of
> community entirely. Therefore it's my opinion that the Cy awards are not a
> community event. They have become quite apparently a very NON-community
> event and should be promoted as such. Period.
>
> As far as bickering goes, whenever there's a committee of more than one
> person, expression of difference is guaranteed. Ask anyone with a
> boyfriend, girlfriend, husband, wife, child, friend, neighbor... well, I'm
> sure you get my drift. Viva la difference because difference is usually the
> most travelled road to improvement and progress. Barring the occasional
> traffic fatality :) But in a sense I do agree with you, Goober, it seems to
> me that the old adage "too many cooks spoil the brew" held sway,
> particularly with the last Cys. My impression was that the committee was
> overly concerned with social acceptibility to the point that they pandered
> to fears instead of disspelling them. It was this same pandering which
> caused the awards' true meaning to be lost on me and many others. The web
> site vote reenactment only raised red flags in my mind. Plus I felt the
> "nomination yard", although a good idea, was confusingly executed. But like
> anything else, improvement can happen.
>
> Improvement, however, will never happen as long as these events are ruled by
> people who cling to attitudes of "like it or leave it" (see BinaryBud's
> illuminating reply to my original post in this thread). The devolvement of
> the Cy awards isn't going to correct itself as long as this self-limiting
> attitude prevails. Most people need to feel they're welcome to take part,
> that their efforts will be appreciated even if their ideas are determined as
> unsuitable.
>
>
> "goober king" <gooberking at utn.cjb.net> wrote in message
> news:3E5A56DA.40008 at utn.cjb.net...
>
>
>
|
Feb 26, 2003, 12:16pm
yea sorry for the "ignorant" thing....that was uncalled for and quite lame. :(
BTW I totally agree with your points. Just not the way you started out. lol
and Count also has a good point..... here we go again....:)
I think the CY's need to be 100% independant from AWI. In MY Opinion...AWI is the reason for all the "neutering"....It's a "liability issue" If the CY's didnot needthe world for the event I believe they could do whatever they wanted. But since they are using an AWI sponsered world for the event, then they must remain "politically correct".
Leo :)
Again sorry for my "rudeness". I have no excuse for it.
[View Quote]"sidris" <sidris at dslextreme.com> wrote in message news:3e5c57c2 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Bud... what am I up to, exactly? Oh, and tell me how I'm spamming while
> you're at it. Still shakin' my head over that one. Since you apologized
> for being snippy I'll calm down. I probably won't forget that you called me
> ignorant, though. :)
>
> I don't dislike the Cys. Everyone deserves recognition for positive effort.
> I just feel it's a mistake to exclude adult-content worlds because they're a
> huge part of our *community*. More than this, art and innovation cross all
> boundaries, no matter who creates them or where they're created. I mean...
> I keep remembering something about RoboBuilder and an opium den :)
>
> Okay, I'm kidding, truly.
>
> As far as a better idea goes, okay, Bud, I suppose it's fair for you to
> throw down the gauntlet (after calling me ignorant!). The best I can offer
> is what I have offered in the past. That, just like the worlds now have
> ratings, that the Cy committee post world ratings for every nominee (which I
> think they do) and then offer a standard disclaimer that these worlds be
> visited at the visitor's risk. This way no one risks offense and, in the
> case of minors, responsibility is left where it should be - with the
> parents.
>
> As an adult, I'd much rather use my own discernment, make my own choices,
> than have them made for me. This is what the exclusion of adult worlds from
> the Cy is doing to everyone. Besides, it's also re-shaping the entire
> tradition of the Cy awards just as much as trying to implement an entirely
> new awards event would do.
>
> Sid
> (never negative!)
>
> "binarybud" <leo at realPANTStourvision.com> wrote in message
> news:3e5b71b0$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> what your up to.
> constantly knock the people that are TRYING to reward others for their work.
> Remember Sidris it was the CY's last year that accepted the adult content
> and the COMMUNITY that did not....so what gives? I have no agenda and am
> associated with any one on these issues... these are my own observations.
> It's a private event aimed at recognizing the community.
> out negativeness.....if your so hot about this subject ...then do something
> besides criticize everyone that is trying.
>
>
|
Mar 6, 2003, 4:30pm
the point most people are missing is that WE DO have evidence, but because it will compromise our intelligence sources, we cannot show this undeniable evidence right now. Someday the WORLD will understand why we have taken this hard stance against Saddam. He NEEDS to go. And for now we are strong enough to take the heat. Bu we must stand strong against Saddam, or his neighbors will ALL pay the price...and we cannot afford to let that happen..
IMO
Leo :)
[View Quote]"the joker ss" <the_joker_ss at hotmail.com> wrote in message news:3e678c10$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Powell came with so called evidence , just some video tapes that the
> inspectors themselfes said were no evidence , and it needs only one veto to
> stop the vote , and there are like 5 veto powers that plan to vote no , and
> that means alot .
>
>
|
Mar 6, 2003, 7:38pm
but you did not hear what i said "we have proof of the weapons, but cannot disclose it yet" how do you figure he has no weapons? He's distroying some of the ones that have been "found so far". Just wait and see. This guy is no "nice guy" and don't you dare make it out that way.
[View Quote]"the joker ss" <the_joker_ss at hotmail.com> wrote in message news:3e6794c4$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> the UN resolution is about the weapons he doesnt have , if the USa wont
> prove it , then they have no reason to attack iraq , but this war is about
> getting rid of saddam , so why even bother inspections when bush doesnt care
> about the results
>
>
|
Mar 7, 2003, 11:47am
agreed and it works both ways.
[View Quote]"kf" <none at junk.mail> wrote in message news:3E67CC62.3AC0 at junk.mail...
> Propaganda is always a nice thing:
>
> Actually, I have proof that Jesus is alive, and Mohammed also.
> Of course, I cannot reveal this information to the public to protect my
> sources and the two buddies. :-)
>
>
>
>
>
> binarybud wrote:
|
Mar 7, 2003, 1:38pm
The only intentional iraqi deaths of women and children will be caused by Saddam himself. The USA does not purposefully kill women and children like you seem to think we avoid that at all costs. (yes EVERYONE can make mistakes those do happen)Thats why we say Saddam, you leave we no come for you.....simple huh? he leaves we don';t even drop a thing on him. Ya know.....we even invented "smart bombs" so we don't have to just blanket bomb the area...we can take out his toilet if we want..:) We(the US) have NO PROBLEMS with the iraqi people, none at all, why would we want to harm them? And don't give me that crap about oil. yes oil IS there on-site....but we only care about the iraqi people and their unfit leader right now... we need to separate them so the people can live better lives without fear. and so thier neighbors do not have to live in fear of Saddam.
I';m not sure why i am even trying to explain this to you.....your already brainwashed into thinking Bush is evil....lol
But if you decide you wanna actually look into some facts..... well start with what i have said and try and prove me wrong..:) with facts not drivel.
Leo :)
[View Quote]"the joker ss" <the_joker_ss at hotmail.com> wrote in message news:3e68b7f3$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> but the discussion is about if its worth a war , and a war would bring many
> more thousands of death women and children , and no its not worth it , and
> its not the reason bush wants this war
>
>
|
Mar 7, 2003, 2:48pm
exactly, i guess i forgot to say..... Saddam goes, and we are able to confirm the disarming...real simple stuff here.
And stop that crap....it's NOT about the weapons he doesn't have idiot. He has quite real and threatening weapons....
Ya know...i wish Saddam was one of YOUR neighbors....you'd love all his none existant weapons sitting in your back yard...all you need to do is close your eyes and POOF they are not there anymore..;)
here just so you don't miss it....... YOUR WELCOME..... 'cause I know you're the type that will never thank the USA for helping clean up YOUR backyard..... 'cause you don't think it's dirty yet.
Leo :)
[View Quote]"the joker ss" <the_joker_ss at hotmail.com> wrote in message news:3e68c003$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> now you say if saddam goes there is no war , i thought this was about the
> weapons he doesnt have ?
>
>
|
Mar 7, 2003, 3:13pm
it should be yes but Saddam is hidding everything from them. so i guess THEY are not the ones to deside huh?
[View Quote]"the joker ss" <the_joker_ss at hotmail.com> wrote in message news:3e68d1ac at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> but isnt it up to the UN and the inspectors to say if he disarms or not ?
>
>
|
Mar 7, 2003, 3:14pm
whoa lets pile it on here.... your just reaching and simply very argumentative with no basis in facts end of discussion with you.
<shakes head in aw>
[View Quote]"the joker ss" <the_joker_ss at hotmail.com> wrote in message news:3e68d142$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> if there are weapons the inspectors will find em , and iraq does cooperate ,
> as blix just said at the UN councill . no need to call me idiot , we can
> keep this discussion constructive ? if its about saddam himself , then Bush
> should say so , i think they thought they could get iraq to break the
> resolution and have a reason to start this war , with approval of the UN
> councill , but at their surprise iraq does cooperate , so now ppl try to
> talk about all the bad things he did in the past . your defence secretary
> Rumsfeld , shaked hands with Saddam Hussein in the 80's , while he allready
> killed lot of ppl , and with the masacre end 1980's , where lot of citizens
> where killed with chemical wepaons , no one cared , not even the UN . it
> suddenly wasnt ok anymore after iraq invaded kuwait . you call Iraq and
> North korea such bad countries , what have they done to the USAin the past
> 20 years ? ( in north koreas case 40 years ) . the US gouverment called the
> communistic North Vietnam a threat also , they lost more then 50000 american
> lives in this , only to loose this war , and what did vietnam wrong to the
> USA in the past 30 years ? nothing .
>
>
|
|