|
|
icey // User Search
icey // User Search
Apr 5, 2001, 6:10pm
I am with you, I am just hoping all that may come true
icey
[View Quote]rolu wrote:
>
> "icey" <icey at altavista.net> wrote in message
> news:3ACA3A8F.54773A82 at altavista.net...
> counter
>
> That varies. In the post office there's a clear you <-> person behind the
> counter. Here we all talk to each other, so we all take turns.
>
> inadequate...who's
> anything
> built
> help...long
>
> People are sharing help, thoughts and idea's more than ever using the net.
> This includes things you won't like.
>
> rolu
|
Apr 5, 2001, 6:28pm
What do you mean, rolu?
icey
Apr 5, 2001, 1:24pm
I could understand you 'loud and clear':)
icey
[View Quote]s p a r k wrote:
>
> Becuase someone Deleted the Object path (Again) and they welcome message
> said that it would be doin periodically becuase of OP porbs? Don't you read?
>
> kmissile583k <Kmissile58 at shoemakervillage.org> wrote in message
> news:3ACB8ACF.6010102 at shoemakervillage.org...
|
Apr 13, 2001, 2:24pm
Illuminati ...nice name ...a card game based on images, characters and
stories like for 'Magic'? I know you won't tell..
icey:)
[View Quote]facter wrote:
>
> *shakes his head*
>
> You know, I play a card game called Illuminati - its just like this
> newsgroup !!!
>
> I'm thinking of creating a card for play based on it in fact =)
>
> F.
>
> "eep" <eep at tnlc.com> wrote in message news:3AD62AAB.62870E6B at tnlc.com...
> http://quicken.excite.com/investments/news/story/djbn/?story=/news/stories/d
> j/20010410/BT20010410003410.htm&symbol=AWLD
|
Apr 26, 2001, 3:38pm
Hi morgen,
http://www.caligari.com/help/tuts_books/index.html
http://3dgraphics.about.com/compute/3dgraphics/cs/truespace/index_2.htm?terms=caligari+truespace
http://3dgraphics.about.com/compute/3dgraphics/cs/truespace/index.htm?terms=caligari+truespace
icey
[View Quote]morgen wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> Could someone point me in the direction of where the good Truespace
> Tutorials are?
>
> Thanks
>
> morgen
|
May 21, 2001, 12:41pm
You're doing great:)
icey
[View Quote]facter wrote:
>
> Do you have *any* idea how many proxy/NT issues we have? They account for
> anywhere up to 60% of all tech support issues....god I cant wait for it.
>
> As for everything else..well, sorry, I'm not the one that makes decisions
> and such, but, let me just ask you something - why, if we wernt interested
> in the users opinions as to features as you are accusing us of, would we put
> this up ? http://www.activeworlds.com/products/suggest.html - And let me
> assure you, this page IS being compiled, and the results are interesting (I
> have seen them), and future builds *will* be using results from that page
> to help determine what will be in them.
>
> So 3.2 is a more bones tech build, for supporting more platforms, and to
> help the poor buggers that are stuck behind proxy servers (you have NO idea
> how many people mail me with problems as to it, you really dont.. ).
>
> You guys continuously thinking that things are apathetic around here in
> regards to users, without actually looking at the initiatives that people
> here *DO* make for the users - how about instead of just looking on your
> side of the fence, you look at the things that we DO do for the users on the
> resources we have available ?
>
> F.
>
> "goober king" <rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu> wrote in message
> news:3B0875FE.2C26D8A3 at acsu.buffalo.edu...
|
May 22, 2001, 2:33pm
If I were you I wouldn't be so sure they don't...
icey
[View Quote]wing wrote:
>
> Maybe I or some other less "pushy and obnoxious" citizen should mirror this list which represents a great number of the things we
> less "pushy and obnoxious" citizens want as well? Would you listen then?
> "facter" <"Facter at AWsupport"> wrote in message news:3b0a737c$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
|
May 22, 2001, 8:54pm
There is one thing I can't truely understand in this whole saga...if you
guys do not like AW, if you do not like the way it is implemented, if
you do not like the ppl worrking for it, if you do not agree with them,
if you think to do it far better, if you think your suggestions are
gold, if you think aw do not worth anythinig...what are you all doing
here?
icey
[View Quote]eep wrote:
>
> facter wrote:
>
>
>
> Perhaps you missed my AW history page, Facter (you seem to miss a lot...). http://tnlc.com/eep/aw/history.html (this time read it) and learn WHY I'm such a "pain", "pushy", and "obnoxious". Read and learn and just TRY to put yourself in my place. If AWCI didn't continually act incompetent I wouldn't have to BE such a "pain". Think about it...
>
>
> Because it's your job?
|
May 21, 2001, 1:09pm
Unfortunately this is happening for all software I know, technology is
improving fast in the computer field and users should be aware of it, on
the other hand it would be a pity to not implement because of some
people are still running a Pentium. I am not sure this is an easy task
for programmers and engineers. As far as AW is concerned I can see they
allow a wide range of users despite many others companies, they can give
you 2 different browsers depending on your hardware and the next 3.2
will also run on Win NT 4.0. Of course this is a problem for world
owners because they will never know who may drop in, I can say I have
built for AW3.1 and I am very sorry for who's still on 2.2, but I left
some old commands that could have been simply replaced with better ones
in the 3.1, I think I've made my decision...
icey
[View Quote]wing wrote:
>
> It would seem that the main cause of 2.2 use is lack of 3d hardware. Even in the "corperate sites", NT4 is becoming an endangered
> species. However, these corperate sites oftentimes have lame onboard video or non-3d video. Lose the NT4 support, it will hold AW
> back, and FRICKIN LOSE RENDERWARE.
> "chucks party" <Chucks_Party at hotmail.com> wrote in message news:3b08f105 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
|
Jun 1, 2001, 6:04pm
In my opinion you need a tutor if not you can cope with it..
here's again:
>Subject:
Community newsgroup charter reminder
Date: 10 Feb 2001 11:47:51 -0500 From: "activeworlds"
<cof at activeworlds.com>
Organization: Activeworlds.com, Inc.Newsgroups: community
Charter of the news.activeworlds.com/community
News.activeworlds.com/community newsgroup is for anyone who is
interested in AW and who can follow Usenet newsgroup netiquette, basic
rules of
polite human interaction, and any further restrictions imposed by this
charter.
[View Quote]builderz wrote:
> ...Everyone here is entitled to their freedom of speech,
> which includes the right to curse or not to curse. Some don't mind it,
> other do. Some don't agree with what Eep has to say, others do. What Eep
> says may or may not go against the community charter, but since AWCI
> hasn't appointed an "official" moderator to enforce the charter (Facter
> reads this newsgroup, but his official job description does not include
> moderator), in my opinion, swearing in these newsgroups is fair game.
>
> Builderz
> Stuff-X - Bot & World Hosting Services
> http://www.stuffx.com/aw/
> PGP Key ID: 0xAC0E7073 (for non-commercial use)
>
> brandon wrote:
|
Jun 1, 2001, 6:05pm
Sorry for typoing here's again..:)
In my opinion you need a tutor if not you can't cope with it..
here's again:
>Subject:
Community newsgroup charter reminder
Date: 10 Feb 2001 11:47:51 -0500 From: "activeworlds"
<cof at activeworlds.com>
Organization: Activeworlds.com, Inc.Newsgroups: community
Charter of the news.activeworlds.com/community
News.activeworlds.com/community newsgroup is for anyone who is
interested in AW and who can follow Usenet newsgroup netiquette, basic
rules of
polite human interaction, and any further restrictions imposed by this
charter.
[View Quote]builderz wrote:
> ...Everyone here is entitled to their freedom of speech,
> which includes the right to curse or not to curse. Some don't mind it,
> other do. Some don't agree with what Eep has to say, others do. What Eep
> says may or may not go against the community charter, but since AWCI
> hasn't appointed an "official" moderator to enforce the charter (Facter
> reads this newsgroup, but his official job description does not include
> moderator), in my opinion, swearing in these newsgroups is fair game.
>
> Builderz
> Stuff-X - Bot & World Hosting Services
> http://www.stuffx.com/aw/
> PGP Key ID: 0xAC0E7073 (for non-commercial use)
>
> brandon wrote:
|
Jun 1, 2001, 6:38pm
Here's again
Usenet Netiquette
http://www.ccs.yorku.ca/internet/news/policy_netiquette.htm
http://sunland.gsfc.nasa.gov/info/guide/Usenet_Netiquette.html
http://www.use-net.ch/netiquette_engl.html
Have a nice day
icey
>
> News.activeworlds.com/community newsgroup is for anyone who is
>Usenet newsgroup netiquette...
>
[View Quote]
Jun 1, 2001, 7:21pm
Do you mean everybody? Or the people you know?
[View Quote]alphabit phalpha wrote:
>
> I think Eep's Cy Award awarded in June 99.... I believe,can help explain
> Nornny and anyone else's defense for Eep:);
> Write in category
> Citizen we can't live with but can't live without
> Eep
|
Jun 1, 2001, 7:33pm
WE can't live with but can't live without
and ANYONE else's defense for Eep:)
....Do you mean everybody (WE, ANYONE), or the people you know?
[View Quote]alphabit phalpha wrote:
>
> huh?:)
>
> "icey" <icey at altavista.net> wrote in message
> news:3B1808BC.6A05744B at altavista.net...
|
Jun 1, 2001, 7:36pm
Ah ok, you meant someone...
some people can't live with but can't live without
and some people's defense for Eep:)
I am picky:)))
[View Quote]alphabit phalpha wrote:
>
> I mean those that nominated and voted for him:)
>
> "icey" <icey at altavista.net> wrote in message
> news:3B180BA3.42097030 at altavista.net...
> explain
|
Jun 1, 2001, 7:44pm
I'd choose tall red shoes
[View Quote]alphabit phalpha wrote:
>
> I guess so....LOL
> So icey....whatcha got picked out to wear to the ball this year?
> I found a cute little number....black velvet,short,clinging,sleeveless,low
> neckline.
> I'm considering wearing my pearls with it...but doesn't that sound a "bit"
> too conservative ya think?
> Maybe the black velvet, blood red sapphire adorned choker would set the
> neckline off?
> Hmmmmmmmm........
|
Jun 1, 2001, 7:49pm
Well you can even do only with red shoes
[View Quote]alphabit phalpha wrote:
>
> To compliment the choker?
> Hmmmm.....I bet this is giving my Gorean friends ideas...hehehehhe!
>
> "icey" <icey at altavista.net> wrote in message
> news:3B180E0E.786AD741 at altavista.net...
> velvet,short,clinging,sleeveless,low
> "bit"
|
Jun 1, 2001, 7:54pm
Try with red football shoes it's a must now
[View Quote]alphabit phalpha wrote:
>
> Oh right.....I can see it now...the tabloids would go nutso with the gossip
> columns on that one!...Hehehehehe
>
> "icey" <icey at altavista.net> wrote in message
> news:3B180F36.DFEC10AF at altavista.net...
> the
|
Jun 2, 2001, 10:55am
We were referring to language and politeness, btw his website has got a
lot of broken links he should go check
as far as it concerns building there are over 900 worlds online today
and I saw some very impressive works made by not so popular persons for
this NG 'course.
icey
[View Quote]builderz wrote:
>
> I was "defending" Eep because even though he may not be the politest
> person in the world, in my opinion, he has done numerous things for the
> community. Take one look at his website (located at
> http://tnlc.com/eep/aw/). His history page, RWX scripting page, and
> improvements page alone are excellent and contain vast amounts of
> valuable information. What other citizen (besides possibly Mauz and/or
> Dataman) has created an Active Worlds related website as extensive as
> this? You have to give Eep credit for this. Although I suggest he takes
> an anger management course, you can't deny what he has brought to the AW
> community (both good and bad).
>
> Eep is also never afraid to confront the staff of AWCI and tell them
> their faults and/or offer suggestions. He also tries not to let Active
> Worlds become too "stagnant" (as he likes to call it) and pushes for
> change/reform. Additionally, he has enough guts to inform other posters
> here that lack common sense their faults. And for some strange reason,
> whenever Eep gets himself involved, the "trouble poster" usually
> goes away or learns from the experience. If you don't believe me, read
> some posts made by Eep over the past years in these newsgroups. He and
> Mauz have also created the great worlds of Cubed and Hole and they are
> two very intriguing worlds. I would gladly host both of them free of
> charge at any time. Eep has been around the community since 1997 (if I
> recall correctly) and knows what is going on here.
>
> I could continue with even more reasons why I respect Eep in the
> community, but I think you have read enough. By the way, who told you
> that I "don't like him?"
>
> Builderz
> Stuff-X - Bot & World Hosting Services
> http://www.stuffx.com/aw/
> PGP Key ID: 0xAC0E7073 (for non-commercial use)
>
> sw chris wrote:
|
Jun 2, 2001, 11:18am
True..until one has proof to the contrary, btw I think it's better to
know and then decide what to do than ignore and do whatever...you never
know, you know?:)
icey
[View Quote]builderz wrote:
>
> Those Usenet netiquette links would be of more use if users of the
> newsgroup would abide with the charter. But again, since no one actively
> moderates this newsgroup (and as we have seen in other people's posts),
> people that do not possess proper Usenet newgroup netiquette DO and HAVE
> posted here. In essence, since no one enforces the charter, not everyone
> thinks they should abide to it (hence the cursing and other "rude"
> postings contained in the NG).
>
> Builderz
> Stuff-X - Bot & World Hosting Services
> http://www.stuffx.com/aw/
> PGP Key ID: 0xAC0E7073 (for non-commercial use)
>
> icey wrote:
|
Jun 2, 2001, 11:44am
Prolly...
[View Quote]nornny wrote:
>
> All the links seem to be in place for me, at least the important ones to his
> tuturials and philosophies. If you mean links to outside sites, probably, I
> didn't check those.
>
> I guess evryone who is new here is so hardpressed on a person's personality
> that they forget that you can always ignore the personality, but you can't
> ignore the accomplishments. Eep never starts up something unless it's
> justified, and everyone ELSE usually goes into a tithy and cause larger
> flame wars then we could ever need. Just take his brash advice and never
> talk to him again if you must. It's very hippocritical to say that he bashes
> people too much, when this whole thread is devoted to getting him bashed.
>
> Eep without his upfrontness wouldn't be Eep. VERY bad without Eep. I mean,
> without Eep, nimwits rose in this newsgroup almost 50%. 1 out of 4 of you,
> I'm predicting, joined AFTER the Facter/Eep war, and have no understanding
> of what went on there.
>
> While YOU complain about Eep, he's constantly knocking on AWCOM's door to
> provide new and improved features and not stupid fun stuff like move and
> rotate. I mean, none of us has a resume compared to Eep, and none of us has
> the right to kick one of the most important members of the community out of
> here, unless you think you're just as good as he is. He's hindered and
> angered by incompetence, nothing more. We're not here to be nice-nice and
> exchange birthday posts. Eep's kind of hardened us to hte reality that this
> newsgroup can do something, if we're as upfront as he is. I was quite
> disappointed he stayed so quiet and let so many newbies get by so easily so
> now they think they can post anything stupid because the charter or some
> rule allows it.
>
> I've been an avid Eep supporter. You deserve whatever Eep throws at you half
> the time because you replied to him, knowing what he'll do. If you haven't
> figured it out, he doesn't HIDE any of his annoyances.
>
> Nornny
>
> PS. This has GOT to be the 10th or 20th debate post this week that has been
> debated 10 times over in the past. Does anyone research anymore?
>
> "icey" <icey at altavista.net> wrote in message
> news:3B18E383.282807D4 at altavista.net...
|
Jun 2, 2001, 12:20pm
Yes and I will hardly see you in a professional usenet group either that
'adult pokemon's':)
[View Quote]wing wrote:
>
> Bleh, if he can't stand AW's groups cuz of you, I doubt he'd survive Usenet except for pokemon groups, which is probably where he
> belongs.
> "eep" <eep at tnlc.com> wrote in message news:3B188249.9A624FA0 at tnlc.com...
|
Jun 2, 2001, 1:00pm
Yes sure ..it's a pity there are some..give me a few time i will surf
again and point out some for you
icey
[View Quote]eep wrote:
>
> icey wrote:
>
>
> It does? Show me...
|
Jun 2, 2001, 1:39pm
http://www3.adnc.com/~brit/
http://gel.urstudios.com/
http://www.earthlink.net/error/404.html
http://a3d.com/
http://www.3dfx.com/developers/sdk.html
http://webhome.idirect.com/~jymbob/renderware/
http://worldoss.com/
http://www.zdnet.com/techlife/
......
here are some ...
[View Quote]eep wrote:
>
> icey wrote:
>
>
> It does? Show me...
|
Jun 2, 2001, 2:51pm
This ZDNet link works for me, yes it works but leads to a homepage that
hasn't anything to do with what was linked for, on a website broken
links should be always avoided if you think some may be updated later
you just replace it when it is. Anyway...I just had a quick look at,
there are others and I do not have the time to surf longer actually
Have a good day
icey
[View Quote]builderz wrote:
>
> Please see my comments below:
>
> icey wrote:
>
> This used to be Ron Britvich's website (the original lead programmer of
> Active Worlds). Eep probably still offers a link to it in case Mr.
> Britvich ever decides to come back to it and update it.
>
>
> Mr. Britvich used to be affiliated with this. Their website has moved to
> http://www.mutationlabs.com/gel/.
>
>
> Definitely should be removed.
>
>
> Didn't they get acquired by Creative Labs and/or go bankrupt?
>
>
> 3dfx has also been blown out of the water.
>
>
> Remove this one.
>
>
> This one as well should be removed.
>
>
> This ZDNet link works for me.
>
> Builderz
> Stuff-X - Bot & World Hosting Services
> http://www.stuffx.com/aw/
> PGP Key ID: 0xAC0E7073 (for non-commercial use)
|
Jun 2, 2001, 3:01pm
Of 'course there you curse and curse and curse and curse ..touche:)
[View Quote]wing wrote:
>
> Huh? alt.comp.hardware.overclocking and it's subgroups are some pretty common places to find me, asking and answering questions
> about these wonderboxes and how to make them worth what you paid. Of course I use my real name there, hiding behind a screenname
> isn't neccessary there.
> "icey" <icey at altavista.net> wrote in message news:3B18F76E.643A0184 at altavista.net...
> he
|
Jun 2, 2001, 3:31pm
btw I think I have found interesting oldies about this surfing the
net...
http://www.mutationlabs.com/gel/gelteam.html
http://www.online-magazine.com/britvich2.htm
http://www.ccon.org/conf98/report/rolandreport.html
http://www.multimania.com/nmf/cof/events/meeting.html
[View Quote]>builderz wrote:
> This used to be Ron Britvich's website (the original lead programmer of
> Active Worlds). Eep probably still offers a link to it in case Mr.
> Britvich ever decides to come back to it and update it.
|
Jun 2, 2001, 3:45pm
I am not sure what you are talking about..anyway I have better to do
now:)
[View Quote]wing wrote:
>
> Forgive me, but what the HELL are you talking about? Language barriers suck.
> "icey" <icey at altavista.net> wrote in message news:3B191D59.E2887CD1 at altavista.net...
> where
|
Jun 3, 2001, 3:05pm
This should be posted in the wishlist actually
icey
[View Quote]eep wrote:
> All I want is for people to stick to AW and leave out all the soap operas, politics, and other real-life crap that is unnecessary for a pleasant online existance. In short, leave the fluff off-line.
>
> sw chris wrote:
>
|
Jun 3, 2001, 3:09pm
Please...
As far it concerns broken links I'd suggest you to check your whole
website or to have a check at
http://websitegarage.netscape.com/wsg/scripts/states/start.cgi?banner=whatsnew&origin=wsg&page=/tuneup/index.html
I had just a quick look at:
http://tnlc.com/eep/aw/improve.html
http://tnlc.com/rw/
http://tnlc.com/rw/links.html#objects
....Thank you
say please and thanks sometimes it may help
[View Quote]eep wrote:
>
> The pages you found these links on would help.
>
> icey wrote:
>
|
|
