|
|
cozmo // User Search
cozmo // User Search
Oct 4, 2001, 9:48pm
actually yes i do....and as i see it you don't have to use the .lib if you
don't want to
[View Quote]"kah" <kah at kahbot.com> wrote in message
news:3bbcc6ce$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> uhm... do you have a *CLUE* to how C++ works?? I doubt it, and in that
case,
> don't comment it.
>
> KAH
>
> "cozmo" <b.nolan2 at verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:3bbb8930 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> greeter
the
> send
Win32
> Debug--------------------
> to
>
>
|
Oct 5, 2001, 3:19pm
told ya :P
[View Quote]"ananas" <vha at oct31.de> wrote in message news:3BBD3439.E5018CBB at oct31.de...
> You can !
>
> - LoadLibrary() loads the dynamic link library into memory
> - GetProcAddress() gives you access to the functions
> - FreeLibrary() unloads the library
>
> Pendant in Unix :
>
> - dlopen() loads the shared library into memory
> - dlsym() gives you access to the functions
> - dlclose() unloads the library
>
>
> Actually the it is only loaded if it isn't already in memory,
> otherwise the reference count is increased. Unload is only
> done if there are no references left.
>
> The access functions return pointers to the functions that
> you can directly use to call the functions. The declarations
> of the pointers that receive the result have to contain the
> exact prototypes of the function in pointer form.
>
>
> One trap is that all linkers have different ideas of the name
> argument for GetProcAddress(), it is the internal name and
> depends very much on calling convention (pascal, cdecl, stdcall)
> and some linkers append a brief parameter description for the
> prototype, I think the format is
> itoa(lengt of argument list) + ' at ' + atoi(resultlength)
>
> If the DLL is your own it's a good idea to have aliases
> for these weird names.
>
>
> john viper wrote:
>
> --
> "_
> |
> /\
> \ /
> __/ /_
|
Dec 24, 2001, 2:44am
excuse me?
[View Quote]"gamer" <robbie at oriox.com> wrote in message
news:3c262fca at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Cunt :o)
>
> "swampthing" <swampthing at sverige.nu> wrote in message
> news:3c25c167$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> news:3c252bee at server1.Activeworlds.com...
features:
> will
> Object
> Improved
> the
>
>
|
Dec 24, 2001, 7:32pm
AWLD or cit number 1 is used for its rights only....no one actually logs in
under that name
[View Quote]"awst gavroche" <gav at vrg8.com> wrote in message
news:3c279dc7$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> DimmBot 1.1.2 is a chatlogger that prevents the tamering of the log file.
>
> www.awst.net/dimmbot/
>
> I am offering a free citizenship to anyone who can falsify a log.
>
> The challenge is to submit a chat between AWLD, Roland, Eep and yourself.
> Something that I know would never happy in any real life instance. :)
>
> Would also be interesting to see the "key" to the hash :)
>
> You can send the results to my email if you
> prefer: awst at awst.net
>
> Thanks go to a special Swedish guy who gave me the inspiration for the
> bot...
>
> Good luck.
>
> Gav
>
> PS. Once I get a bit of time, I will finnish work on the logfile reader
but
> at this moment in time I am sulking because I lost the entire code. :(
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
|
Dec 30, 2001, 3:02am
for what? Xelagot? if so go to www.imatowns.com/xelagot and clicks on
scripts and go to xelags scripts theres one on there
[View Quote]jerme <JerMe at nc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:3c2e9f94$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I've got a friend who's looking for a very simple paintball script. I'd
need
> something that's easily changed and well documented. Please let me know
if
> you've got a script, or know of one that I could use.
>
> Thanks,
> JerMe
>
> --
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Jeremy Booker
> JTech Web Systems
> (www.JTechWebSystems.com -- Coming Soon)
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
|
Aug 30, 2001, 9:48pm
Well theres a such thing as special avs for Public Speakers. Well why not
Caretaker only avs? escpecially my invisible avatar and when i get avs that
i want only to be able to be used by me. It comes really handy.
--
- Cozmo (Brandon)
Of Cozmo-X
(website coming soon)
World: A'Dude
Co-owned world: Safira
Aug 31, 2001, 2:22am
that would be great i guess....but i dont want to make too many demands
[View Quote]"the derek" <ImTheDerek at yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3B8ED9D1.327C3E6B at yahoo.com...
> speaking of that how about not limiting the number
> you can have for each?
>
> cozmo wrote:
not
that
|
Sep 3, 2001, 8:58pm
why? the browser tells you there is a new version all by it self
[View Quote]"ananas" <vha at oct31.de> wrote in message news:3B93DE84.C801A8D4 at oct31.de...
> It would be a good idea to have it there in order
> to see if it will be an upgrade or just the same
> that you already have.
>
> --
> "_
> |
> /\
> \ /
> __/ /_
|
Sep 3, 2001, 11:24pm
just download it from the downloader and stop being so parnoid....they dont
put it on the page becuase new users dont need to know the version...
[View Quote]"ananas" <vha at oct31.de> wrote in message news:3B941EE8.F41475AB at oct31.de...
> What the heck is your problem with having 3 numbers
> on that page? It is part of the product information
> and should be there!
>
> Not all universes offer the latest browser for download
> and sometimes I tell people to upgrade from AW's download
> page who do not visit the AW universe - and they want to
> know what they download. The browser does not suddenly
> appear on all universe download pages just because AW
> publishes a new one - it is not magic but has to be done
> by someone and if no one does it it WILL NOT be done - so
> it is NOT a feature of the universe server to announce
> every browser update that AW has.
>
> the derek wrote:
>
> --
> "_
> |
> /\
> \ /
> __/ /_
|
Sep 5, 2001, 1:46pm
when you first buy it you get free upgrades for a year
[View Quote]"tony m" <fldmshl2013 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3b958af4.6692254 at news.activeworlds.com...
> It costs money to upgrade a galax/uni server, you don't just flip a
> switch and do a little dance.
>
> On 3 Sep 2001 21:21:35 -0400, "the derek" <ImTheDerek at yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>
|
Sep 5, 2001, 6:36pm
so it doesnt always cost money...you cant say it does until you know if the
year has run out
[View Quote]"kah" <kah at kahbot.com> wrote in message
news:3b9674d2$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> yes, and the next year you don't...
>
> KAH
>
> "cozmo" <brandon at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message
> news:3b9648ea at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Oct 5, 2001, 7:20pm
practicly every world i enter ends up being a dumb trial world that has been
mislead into creating
[View Quote]"isa excalibur" <bjarte at development-net.com> wrote in message
news:3bbdfe22 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> 1. Enable/Disable object download and check for update... :)
>
> 2. Organizing of the world list like ex; Opera Browser Hotlist,
> organise it in categories and folders etc... and do not refresh
> the hole list and enable/disable view of 3D Homepages :)
>
> Thats all :)
>
> - Excal
>
>
|
Oct 18, 2001, 9:48pm
this isn't a game......
[View Quote]"sentack" <ahoyt at packetport.com> wrote in message
news:3BCF2D5F.B98237F4 at packetport.com...
> 1) Auto update of avatar data - I hate haveing to dump my data every
> time there's an avatar update. It seems pointless, AW should manage this
> for me and make changes for me.
>
> 2) Fog of War - Or something to make the pop up smoother/more bearable.
>
> 3) Triangle count - Can I get some information on the number of
> currently rendered triangles on screen? I'm getting some rather piss
> poor frame rates and I'm not sure if it's related my graphics card (tnt
> 2 ultra on a p3 800) or players avatars have far too many rendered
> triangles then desierable. I suspect it's the models/avatars some of
> the worlds use being far too 'detailed' per say. I'm almost always in
> upper single digits or at best, low teens in the realm of frame rates
> for almost any world.
>
> 4) Fullscreen - Is there anyway to go into full screen mode and perhaps
> attempt to gain some frame rate advantage over being a windowed
> application?
>
> 5) Resize view screen - Default values for the window size, 640x480,
> 800x600, etc. Or something to help create a nice semi-square viewing
> area.
>
> 6) Zoom - Sometimes I would like to see some objects a little closer at
> a distance. Also good for trying to look at an object on the floor.
>
> 7) Drop object - There needs to be something for builders to allow them
> to drop an object and have it move down untill it collides with another
> objects surface. Not the bounding box but next next surface it finds.
> It's hard at times to get objects to lay on tables or carpets to lay on
> floors.
>
> 8) Avatar Equipment - It would be nice if we could have mind
> customization for avatars in the department of avatars being able to
> pick up and wear other 'equipment' namely new shirts/skins, belts, hats,
> boots, etc. So we the users can look diffrent even if we use the same
> avatar.
>
> 9) Text Macros - a macro/alias to allow users to send back predefined
> text replies.
>
> 10) Emotes - I know there are 'actions' but they dont' cover all the
> range of possable emotions.
>
> 11) Action Tabs - Some models have several actions associated with them,
> Might be time to include a tab button list or some scrollable button
> array.
>
> 12) Face animations - I'm not talking about the blinking eyes, moveing
> mouth would be nice too IF triggered by the player. Or perhaps
> automaticly when the user sends text.
>
> 13) Character states - I want my character to sit in a chair and stay
> there, hold a pose, dance till I say stop, etc. Animations that cycle
> or freeze frame untill I specify where to move from there.
>
> 14) Particle affects - Players want fountains, let them make fountains.
> :-) Include it with the animations and you can have spell casting
> wizards. Hey it's an idea. :-/
>
> 15) Day and Night Cycles - Low light at night, bright durring the day,
> rising and setting suns.
>
> 16) Doors with locks - Make it a keypad next to a door, user clicks it,
> enters a key code and if authorized, they can enter. Truely private
> rooms if this and no cliping allowed is set in a world.
>
> 17) User object browser - I have build rights into a world, GREAT! Now
> what objects exist? A menu to show me would be lovely :-)
>
> 18) Line of sight or obstruction block for speech - It's annoying when
> your in a area with many rooms and you hear someone but don't see them.
> Sometimes I just want to talk to a small group of people in private but
> not have to whisper it all or go really far away so others who don't
> want to hear, don't.
>
> 19) Player Radar - Show me all the indivdiuals in a X radius around me,
> but no backgrouns, just a black circle with dots relative to my location
> and faceing.
>
> 20) Built in Random Number Generator - For the DnD people :-)
>
> That's enough for now.
|
Oct 21, 2001, 3:52pm
no offense but that's the worst idea i've ever heard....that is EXTREMLY
ANOYING having a telegram like that...i don't respond to them becuase its
THEIR decision wether they want me on their list or not...its THEIR contact
list not mine
[View Quote]"lanezeri" <Lanezeri at stuff-x.com> wrote in message
news:3bd30599 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Most of the people I know have gone through their contacts sending them
all
> a message, I was thinking about a button that could be pressed to send a
> message to all the contacts that said "Lanezeri is cleaning his contact
> list, please contact him if you wish to stay" or something corny like
that.
>
> --
>
> Lanezeri
> Lead Bot Programmer at Stuff-X
> http://aw.stuff-x.com
>
>
>
>
|
Oct 21, 2001, 9:15pm
personally i care if the person wants me on the list or not - its not my
list!
the person who is on someone contact list doesn't have the "right" to decide
what the person wants to do with their list
[View Quote]"lanezeri" <Lanezeri at stuff-x.com> wrote in message
news:3bd33e92$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Thank you for your opinion.. I think the person on the other end has a
right
> to have the choice to be on the list tho..
>
> --
>
> Lanezeri
> Lead Bot Programmer at Stuff-X
> http://aw.stuff-x.com
>
>
> "cozmo" <cozmo at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message
> news:3bd30b73 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
its
> contact
them
a
contact
>
>
|
Oct 23, 2001, 11:21am
i can only say "this sucks" when it does....
[View Quote]"sentack" <ahoyt at packetport.com> wrote in message
news:3BD41CE3.7212B576 at packetport.com...
> cozmo wrote:
>
> You guys are seriously no help. Have you anything else to say other
> then "This sucks!" Do you think your the only ones with good ideas or
> something? *Groans*
>
> As for this idea, it's not bad but perhaps we need to alter it some.
> For one thing, maybe the user should have some more information, such as
> some of the following ideas.
> 1) Last time online tab - A tab to inform when the user was last
> online or made visable to this user (If and when ignore/hide/visable
> flags are added in. They are on Feature Vote.)
> 2) Last Message sent Tab - Last time we sent a telegraph to someone.
> Kind of usefull.
> 3) Notes Tab - Rather silly but potentionaly usefull.
> 4) Catagories - Originize your friends. Again silly but when it comes
> ot contacts, I think ICQ.
>
> So this would at least give one a lot more information about who they
> know on thier contact list and what relationship they have with them.
> Then perhaps a mass mailing to all users in all catagories or just one
> for update request. The good friends will respond to you, the bad ones
> (Or idiots like we see around here) Won't. If they don't, then most
> likely you don't need to know them anyway.
>
> How's that?
>
> Tony
|
Oct 23, 2001, 3:26pm
and umm....i explained myself before and it was a perfectly logical
explaination of WHY it sucks
[View Quote]"sentack" <ahoyt at packetport.com> wrote in message
news:3BD588DE.B7DB92A1 at packetport.com...
> cozmo wrote:
>
> Ya know, you could put some effort into actually trying to be helpfull
> instead of a one line complainer.
>
> Tony
|
Oct 23, 2001, 8:11pm
thats exactly what i said stupid
i kind of just blew up at him becuase that kind of message is very anoying
and its the worst thign you would ever implement
[View Quote]"sentack" <ahoyt at packetport.com> wrote in message
news:3BD5D640.A06D46D0 at packetport.com...
> sw chris wrote:
up
not
>
> Reasonable, understandable and acceptable. Plus not one deragitory
> comment in the whole thing. He at least brings up some reasonable ideas
> as to why this could be abuseive. Maybe this was in the mind of those
> who didn't like the idea but if you don't explain the reasons such as sw
> chris has done here, then it just sounds like complaints. In any case.
> Thanks, Good point, well taken.
|
Oct 23, 2001, 10:24pm
ok i'll stop, i made my point across already...but filtering me isn't
exactly a way to get me to stop something. It's not like ill say "Noo noo
don't filter me please!!!"
Dec 21, 2001, 5:56pm
if they did that then everyone except for AW worlds and some worlds would do
it and AW does not want to block tourists out becuase those are future
citezins
[View Quote]"dotar sojat" <barsoom at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:3C22CE3C.B426C925 at my.activeworlds.com...
> Heres something that is LONG overdue. How about a setting to will turn
> the world symbol on the worlds list yellow, meaning open to anyone with
> an AW citizenship, but tourists not allowed.
> It would sure save on bandwidth for runnign bots to keep tourists out.
>
|
Dec 27, 2001, 5:42pm
i've noticed the fog is horrible messed up in 3.2 also. Now it looks more
like a wall then fog....but this on flat grounds too
[View Quote]ananas <vha at oct31.de> wrote in message news:3C2B74B2.46C32C10 at oct31.de...
> The fog with the inner and outer radius work fine
> as long as the ground object is a horizontal plane.
>
> It does not stay outside of the inner radius, if the
> ground is not flat. Instead, the inner distance of
> the fog depends very much on the view direction.
>
> --
> "_
> |
> /\
> \ /
> __/ /_
|
Dec 29, 2001, 6:20pm
in cae you don't know, in the next version (due out next year sometime i
think) they have improved privacy features. One thing i know is Roland used
the ability to hide his online status (so the green checkmark is not visible
when hes on and no one can telgram him). Im pretty sure they've got other
things but i don't know what they all are just yet. Excpect to see a full
list of features around beta testing time.
[View Quote]wizard myrddin <Wiz at rdescape.com> wrote in message
news:3c2e2074 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> And to increase ones privicy, how about authorization before anyone can
put
> you on their contact list????
>
> LOL ok Im rambling but these are good wish's for the new year. And as AW
has
> our contact lists on server the impletmention might be a easy task..
>
>
|
Dec 29, 2001, 7:05pm
"This requires implementing a new database on the universe server side that
stores each citizen's blocked user list"
http://www.activeworlds.com/roland/features/block_telegrams.html
Roland mentions how blocking telegrams woudl work (i think its in the new
version) and that a way to do it (the way they most likely would use) is to
have the uniserver keep a database of the blocked users. That could be what
he meant.
[View Quote]ananas <vha at oct31.de> wrote in message news:3C2E27E5.A0132BC4 at oct31.de...
> I think the "AFK" mode that is announced is a good
> solution for beeing not disturbed, as long as it's
> respected. Too much privacy might result in less
> support for people who really need some help with
> their RWX stuff, worlds, browsers and so on.
>
> You are one of the experienced people in AW so you
> are a target for questions - people who need help
> do not want to disturb you, but their questions
> are an indicator that they respect your knowledge.
>
> It would be nice to be able to switch off telegram
> announcements, but just blocking everything from
> people who are not on your contact list isn't fair,
> better would be to just block this stupid IO.
>
> btw.: contact lists on the server??? Who told you that?
>
> wizard myrddin wrote:
put
has
>
> --
> "_
> |
> /\
> \ /
> __/ /_
|
Dec 29, 2001, 7:08pm
and actually wizard.....right now they don't have ur contact lists on the
server. Its on a little file called contacts.txt in your AW folder.
[View Quote]wizard myrddin <Wiz at rdescape.com> wrote in message
news:3c2e2074 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> And to increase ones privicy, how about authorization before anyone can
put
> you on their contact list????
>
> LOL ok Im rambling but these are good wish's for the new year. And as AW
has
> our contact lists on server the impletmention might be a easy task..
>
>
|
Dec 29, 2001, 7:26pm
well the new version has a database for blocked citezins or whatever but the
whole contact lists are not on the uniserver. And i though you meant it had
already been done
[View Quote]wizard myrddin <Wiz at rdescape.com> wrote in message
news:3c2e3333 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> opps sorry there I was given to beleave this hade been done in preperation
> for new client.
>
>
> "cozmo" <b.nolan2 at verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:3c2e30c2$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
the
can
AW
>
>
|
Dec 29, 2001, 11:05pm
even IF someone were to break into the database and find out who someone is
blocking what would that do? Oh my god someone knows who i blocked! and
since they know their citezin name they can know EVERYTHING about them! Come
on, wow, if they know someones citezin name the worst they can do is
telegram them to death (and get blocked). The name querys thing isnt relevnt
becuase the logging in protocal is seperate from the database (which is just
a list of citezin numbers/names)
bots can find out the ip adress of every person in a world (in range) is
that enroaching on everyones privacy? should we ban bots?
Im not trying to be mean but knowing the citezin names of certain people
isn't the worst of my worries.
"even though it would be easy for them, because all logins are immediately
followed by a series of name queries."
that is totaly diferent from knowing someones cit name. You can find out
anyones cit name easily why would you break into a database to do that. And
the log in part is totaly diferent from the database, so i dont knwo what
you mean by that.
[View Quote]ananas <vha at oct31.de> wrote in message news:3C2E4E4D.AE5A2BC7 at oct31.de...
> yep, contact lists have about the same meaning
> as a private address book. It is my own decision
> whom I have there, same would be for telegram
> blocking. If a universe admin (company) could
> check all connections between their workers,
> this could bring the works council up against
> the software and they would disallow usage of
> the software.
> This was (and is) always a problem with software
> and hardware that deals with communication.
> Another anaology are phone calls. Companies here
> may only store the phone numbers of calls from
> their customers excluding the last two digits,
> and even this is often hot discussed.
>
> I do not speak about universes like AW. I doubt
> that the people there would be interested in
> finding out anything about the contacts of the
> citizens, even though it would be easy for them,
> because all logins are immediately followed by a
> series of name queries.
>
> agent1 wrote:
news:3C2E3DAA.DC9B3C6B at oct31.de...
it isn't a good conzept, because
>
> --
> "_
> |
> /\
> \ /
> __/ /_
|
Dec 29, 2001, 11:43pm
to look into what stuff? a list of blocked names? that still doesnt chnage
anything
[View Quote]ananas <vha at oct31.de> wrote in message news:3C2E6CE2.80B2C0A5 at oct31.de...
> Maybe I wasn't clear enough :
>
> The workers councils do not want the company to
> look into this stuff, I didn't talk about someone
> breaking into the database.
>
>
> cozmo wrote:
is
>
> --
> "_
> |
> /\
> \ /
> __/ /_
|
Dec 30, 2001, 3:13am
ok so if i worked at a company that purcahsed an ActiveWorlds universe and i
looked into the database of people blocked names (considering theres an
interface to view this list, which i highly doubt there is), then what?
thats wrong or something? thats what im trying to say
[View Quote]ananas <vha at oct31.de> wrote in message news:3C2E7036.4B28BF74 at oct31.de...
> if you think so
>
> cozmo wrote:
chnage
news:3C2E6CE2.80B2C0A5 at oct31.de...
someone
>
> --
> "_
> |
> /\
> \ /
> __/ /_
|
Jan 3, 2002, 5:58pm
but dont you agree that if you didnthave to pay it all every year you coudl
pay it easier (not the 10 a month....maybe liek 5 a month or 7 or something)
like paying it every 6 months or 3 or a year or a month if you want
[View Quote]dotar sojat <barsoom at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:3C33EF8A.270A8FFB at my.activeworlds.com...
> There is a third option data. A price increase that is FAIR. If it is a
fair
> price people will still pay it (most of them anyway). I suggest $30
myself,
> but I would be barely able to go as high as $40.
>
> data21 wrote:
>
world
>
|
Jan 13, 2002, 3:18am
i wish that bots could have a greater range of recieving events from. i HATE
making multiple instaces just to cover the whoel world. I think that it
should either be doubled or set up to a certain limit. That way, depending
on the bot, you can have it cover your whoel world from gz or just a lower
range if it is a chatbot. but i dont think this would happen becuase aw
wants you to buy more cits to get more bot instances (which isnt goign to
happen)
|
