|
|
sw chris // User Search
sw chris // User Search
Aug 21, 2001, 2:33pm
Citizen: 306637
Location: 11999N 12127W 0a (Teleport) (View Map)
Built: August 28, 1999, 5:15 pm (Eastern Time)
Model: walk06h.rwx
No description
Total search time: 10.731 seconds.
You have built 122,966 objects in AlphaWorld.
:)
SW Chris
[View Quote]"sw comit" <sam64 at jps.net> wrote in message
news:3b81f01d at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Hey this kinda like my "Total time online poll" a few weeks back: What's
> everyone's total objects built (in Alphaworld)?
>
> You can find out at https://tangent.imatowns.com/awps/firstobject.php
>
>
>
|
Aug 22, 2001, 3:06pm
Lol. A lot of people use signs like that to advertise that they were there.
:) If you want to see where I build, check out www.swcity.net 's teleport
page for James River.
SW Chris
[View Quote]"tyrell" <tyrell1 at sk.sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:3B837F81.FBD002BD at sk.sympatico.ca...
> Hmmm... How about, besides the sign, placing a link to where you build
now...
>
> One object placed in a bare field is like advertising a Happy Meal Box,
along
> the side of a road, thrown from the car.
>
> Tells us quite a bit about yourself but nothing of what you'v done... :-)
>
> sw chris wrote:
>
What's
>
> --
> Tyrell - Alpha Prime - 21.8s 457e 90 - "Mundus vult decipi"
> "Eat well, stay fit, die anyway."
> http://www3.sk.sympatico.ca/ty1/index.html
> http://www.dlcwest.com/~rpatter/index.html
> ICQ UN - 272905
> All those who believe in psychokinesis raise my hand.
>
>
|
Aug 23, 2001, 1:27am
calm down, both of you. You're arguing about a silly word.
SW Chris
[View Quote]"brandon" <brandon at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:3b840e66 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> i dont care about a god dam court.....nobodys going to see that i put
> Copywrite and say "oh i guess ill copy it cuase they spelled it wrong" And
> it doesnt matter becuase there are copyRIGHT notices on my splashsreen and
> in the about box
>
> "kah" <kah at kahbot.com> wrote in message
> news:3b83eea2$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
they
you
i
>
>
|
Aug 22, 2001, 3:11pm
That link doesn't work for me? yes, I made sure the .ram was at the end as
it didn't copy over when I copied the url. Hmm...
SW Chris
[View Quote]"cyberboy" <adam8888 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3b837523 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> there was a short bleep on A & E recently about AW....here is a link to a
> clip of the show
> it is a real media file and the bleep on AW begins at the 29 minute mark -
u
> will have to remove the space in the following url and below is a copy of
my
> comments sent to that shows host
> ht
>
tp://news.bbc.co.uk/olmedia/cta/progs/01/future_just_happened/progs/outside.
> ram
>
> Michael Lewis~
> I hope to shed some light on your seemingly awkward experience in
AlphaWorld
> at ActiveWorlds.com and perhaps offer a second chance for a successful
visit.
> Your engagement in AlphaWorld, the largest of over 1,000 Virtual Reality
> worlds in ActiveWorlds, might have benefited from the support of a
seasoned
> tour guide, which you so desperately sought. It may seem "fast-paced" at
> first and does require an extended visit, more than two minutes, to begin
to
> comprehend it's capacity. Virtual Reality can be confusing to a novice
user
> because it is very complex, yet deeply engrossing, fulfilling, and
> meaningful.
> Quite contrary to your opinion of "keeping the world at a distance,"
> ActiveWorlds is mainly an attempt to bring the global population much
closer
> together. It is also a family environment with close-knit communities and
> moral standards that do not tolerate unethical behavior, such as removing
an
> avatars clothing. The gesture of an idle Tourist avatar is an arm-swinging
> motion, not a gender-specific, egotistical action. The gray "fat" avatars
> that are default for Tourists and initial entry avatars for Citizens (upon
> entering a world for the first time before switching to a suitable avatar
> for your persona) may seem to be "ignoring" or "running away" from others,
> usually because the number of users in an area is larger than the users
> browser settings and may not be directly within another's visibility, much
> like a visit to a real-life shopping center full of strangers.
> I have been a Citizen of ActiveWorlds over 4 years now, belong to several
> communities, and have even become an independent world owner. I have
> developed endearing relationships with many people from all over the
world.
> It has been an exciting learning and growing experience for me and several
> thousand other participants. ActiveWorlds goes beyond a three-dimensional
> chat application as a cultural melting-pot and an advanced educational
tool,
> including many degrees of schooling worlds, community events, achievement
> recognition, and much more. It's quite an astonishment in that every
object,
> in every world, is proudly made and built by humans.
> I invite you back to ActiveWorlds and extend my service as your personal
> tour-guide so that you might realize the limitless possibilities available
> through this enriching technologically advanced software.
> Truly your ActiveWorlds neighbor,
> CyberBoy
>
>
|
Aug 23, 2001, 1:28am
Ok. I got it to work.
Interesting how the user "Michael Lewis" does not exist. I tried to add it
to my contact list so I _could_ show him around.
:)
SW Chris
[View Quote]"casay" <casay2 at home.com> wrote in message
news:3b83ecf2$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Worked for me but I had to add the ht at the front and the .ram at the
end.
> Oh and thanks brandon for giving the timining for where it was at in the
> video.
> Interesting story, too bad no one at AW GZ helped him and he choose the
> Willy avatar! ;-)
> Casay
> "sw chris" <chrisw10 at nckcn.com> wrote in message
> news:3b83e7ca$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> as
to
> a
> mark -
> of
>
tp://news.bbc.co.uk/olmedia/cta/progs/01/future_just_happened/progs/outside.
Reality
at
> begin
> and
> removing
> arm-swinging
> avatars
> (upon
> avatar
> others,
users
> much
> several
> several
> three-dimensional
> achievement
personal
> available
>
|
Aug 24, 2001, 2:10am
Never heard of Internet2 have you? Hehehe... Some universities will have
*something* like a holodeck. However the user is surrounded by four walls
upon which are projected a 3-D environment so you can interact with
coleagues across the network. or something like that... My memory is a bit
fuzzy.
Chris
[View Quote]"wing" <bathgate at prodigy.net> wrote in message
news:3b85c7b9 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> You certainly have high hopes. Trust me, we'll still be on 4.0 :)
> "jfk2 builder" <jfk2 at jfkmusic.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9106E5EFEA27Ejfk2jfkmusiccom at 166.90.181.12...
>
>
|
Aug 27, 2001, 1:47pm
Want to help me with my college algebra? =D
SW Chris
[View Quote]"bluebean" <bluebean at csi.com> wrote in message
news:3b86d0db at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> just a clarification: your line of sight to the horizon would have the
> length of 815,5846 m (in fact you would have to be taller than 1.80 meters
> or have your eyes on the top of your head). To calculate the distance you
> would have to walk to the horizon, you have to calculate the angle
between
> the two radii and then do an calculation on the lenght of the circular
arc.
> Formula if angle A is in degrees is: A (PI/180) r .(r = World radius)
>
> I'm too lazy to do the math now, hehe.
> bluebean
>
> bluebean <bluebean at csi.com> schrieb in im Newsbeitrag:
> 3b86cbb3 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
one
class
and
> at
of
> AW
GeForce
> 15
>
>
|
Aug 24, 2001, 2:03am
will you click a button that teleports you into a bump warp trap? hehehe...
:) Seriously though, it seems like a good suggestion. Caretaker should have
the option to disable it though in case he/she wants to add to the theme of
the world with a single backdrop. Or with AW 3.2.. sky dome.
SW Chris
[View Quote]"jfk2 builder" <jfk2 at jfkmusic.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9106EBAD0A7D7jfk2jfkmusiccom at 166.90.181.12...
> Would People Really Do That?
>
> You don't know me very well do you... LMAO!!!!!!!
>
> I'll click on every button you have in there EVEN if i have to fly high
> or fly low or underground.... I'll click on everything there is and
> give you a gram or email and say... Guess What.... This button 6n 7e
> don't worrk for some reason and it's also located -300a = 300 meters
> below ground lol
>
> "m a r c u s" <i_have_a_site at yahoo.com> wrote in
> news:3b857a20$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com:
>
|
Aug 24, 2001, 2:04am
Um, are you talking Caretaker, with the ability to wipe a world clean in a
single stroke with a certain set of software, or just world rights, where
you can't wipe the world?
SW Chris
[View Quote]"jfk2 builder" <jfk2 at jfkmusic.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9106EA80CC62Bjfk2jfkmusiccom at 166.90.181.12...
> Right now RPG world is about as close a world that has most everyone as
> a CareTaker. Including some of those i've had a few words with in this
> newsgroups have CT there... Either he [World Owner] ads the CT's or
> his friends who are CT's ask me & BEG me to ad the CT's... and yes....
> I've added a fet trusted CT's too... [I'm hosting the world and so it's
> open for me to add who i want. Owner has last word though. But if he
> says YES... I will add who ever his friends decide too.] Right now RPG
> world is a Wide Open Build World for anyone including Tourists... [that
> is why i have my BOTS in there to keep an EYE on things] And even those
> that i've had strong words with here in the newsgroups have special
> rights. Bots, Eject, ED, Special Objects But yes... The world Owner
> told me to leave the thing wide open... OK it's his world... [PS...
> It's Set To HUGE and there is NO Registry file there... lol]
>
>
> "kah" <kah at kahbot.com> wrote in news:3b856364 at server1.Activeworlds.com:
>
|
Aug 24, 2001, 2:05pm
I thought about investing in a world one of these days... just need to learn
how to model first, and I can't seem to find the time to do that. : (
SW Chris
[View Quote]"goober king" <rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu> wrote in message
news:3B8669FE.6030404 at acsu.buffalo.edu...
> As far as the worldbuilding community is concerned, I think Eep's right.
> There haven't been too many HenrikG's or Casay's to come along in a
> while, and it seems like everyone's trying to go out on their own,
> create a world, and keep it to themselves. Guess everyone's gotten
> comfortable now that the worldbuilder's before them have paved the way
> for them.
>
> As for the "up and coming" people, I wouldn't call myself an expert on
> such things by any stretch of the imagination. But I suppose if I had to
> pick who I thought would go far in this community, I'd say Anduin
> Lothario, SW Comit, Syntax, SW Chris, KAH (if he cleans up his act
> *smirk*), JBELL, Mike Zimmer, and Programmer (now Radon). I think if
> these guys stick with their stuff, and maybe even branch out and
> diversify themselves a bit, they can definitely go all the way. As far
> as I'm concerned, as long as you stay committed to helping out and being
> an active member of the community, you'll go far no matter what you do.
>
> eep wrote:
>
as much as we used to in the newsgroups and in-world.
know if
has
GK?
>
> --
> Goober King
> Great, now their asking him for advice...
> rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu
>
|
Aug 27, 2001, 1:50pm
Yeah, but I want to create an all new object path. =) Think Cubed and
Hole. I have been inspired.
SW Chris
[View Quote]"jfk2 builder" <jfk2 at jfkmusic.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9107C4B6E402jfk2jfkmusiccom at 166.90.181.12...
> What you might want to do is to actually buy that world. And play with
> it for awhile... Eventually you will see that something needs to be
> changed or added to. BUT you don't have the correct object.
> Hmmmmm..... Now i have a NEED for the object... Better start to learn
> how. That should get you going.
>
>
> "sw chris" <chrisw10 at nckcn.com> wrote in
> news:3b867b37 at server1.Activeworlds.com:
>
|
Aug 24, 2001, 2:01pm
Interesting... sounds like an elaborate trick made by college kids with
biology majors though...
SW Chris
[View Quote]"chucks party" <Chucks_Party at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3b8625e7$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> http://www.artbell.com/hoagland3.html
> Brand new crop formations, we are not alone, we've made contact :)
>
>
|
Aug 27, 2001, 1:55pm
And then we bring out the nukes! :D Just playing devil's advocate here,
but perhaps they don't want to make direct contact for that very reason.
Then again they'd probably just ignore our planet anyways... Crop circle
phenomena are an illogical way to communicate, Captain.
SW Chris
[View Quote]"bcg" <Aquisclone at aol.com> wrote in message
news:3b883149 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I saw a show, I think on The Learning Channel, where two guys went out in
> one night and made a crop circle like the ones on that page. It looks
like
> more work than it actually is. Maybe they will play it again sometime, it
> was very interesting.
>
> I think if there really is other life 'out there' they wouldn't waste
their
> time trying to let their presence be known by making pictures in fields.
If
> there really are 'aliens', and they were smart enough to get all the way
to
> Earth from wherever they came from, I think they would choose a less
> primitive way of letting us know they were here.
>
> BCG
>
>
> "chucks party" <Chucks_Party at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:3b8625e7$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Aug 27, 2001, 1:56pm
If there really was substantial evidence that the aliens have landed, why
isn't it all over the news?
SW Chris
[View Quote]"chucks party" <Chucks_Party at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3b88bfa8 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> These crop formations have been throughly investigated and were not there
one
> day and there the next, these are brand new photos and they are also
working on
> obtaining the security camera images that surround the radio tower you see
in
> this picture to get more clues, we shall see. But I don't think anyone
could
> make the ones that they are now showing us with the method you described
in a 16
> hour period of time which is basically the time they would have to do it
if the
> people that worked there left work at 5pm and came back at 9am the next
day to
> find them. You say why would aliens do it, I say why would people waste
the time
> to do it, lolol OK if you thought those were interesting, here are some
that
> appeared over this past winter on ice too thin to walk on, another one of
the
> many unexplained mysteries of these circle formations
> http://www.artbell.com/icerings.html
>
> "chucks party" <Chucks_Party at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:3b8625e7$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Aug 27, 2001, 1:59pm
Um, actually some "abductions" as you call them are unexplainable. :)
SW Chris
[View Quote]"goober king" <rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu> wrote in message
news:3B897045.5020309 at acsu.buffalo.edu...
> Earth to Chuck! Come in, Chuck! Loss of reality imminent!
>
> You *do* realize that Star Trek is science *fiction*, correct? There is
> no "Prime Directive" and there are no aliens. (at least, not in this
> neck of the universal woods) The truth of the matter is that the vast
> majority of anything alien related, whether it be UFO sightings, crop
> circles, or even abductions, have all been proven to *not* have anything
> to do with aliens. They have all had a scientific or human explanation
> for them. As far as the "facts" about aliens are concerned, I believe it
> is *you* who are assuming too much.
>
> But hey, I'm just a narrow-minded person unwilling to believe in such
> things, right? Perhaps you could share with us your little UFO
> experience and help us "see the light", as it were...
>
> chucks party wrote:
>
tell, it
would they
biodegradable
change
They are
you think
along,
much, I
know the
alone here
>
>
> --
> Goober King
> This should prove entertaining...
> rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu
>
|
Aug 27, 2001, 2:13pm
Some people believe these UFO sightings are really not UFOs at all, but
rather manifestations of the spirit world. Why they become visible to the
human eye at times like this is odd.
And then the reason the government is likely blacking out all UFO reports is
probably because of their top secret research facility Area 51. Odds
indicate that scientists there have been experimenting with new aviation
technology for the past 40 years or so. I'm pretty sure that they don't
want the Islamic Jihad or Saddam Hussein to get ahold of one of those
babies, so the safest thign to do is black it out.
Now, consider the case of Salina, Kansas in the 1950's or 60's. I can't
remember which decade. :\ Interstate 70. One night a strange set of blue
and white streaks move quickly across the sky from the west horizon to dead
center over the overpass of I-70 and I-135 near Salina, KS. All vehicles in
that area go dead, presumably from Electro-magnetic pulse. They hover there
for a moment, still emitting the EMP. Cars won't start. But then they
streak off toward the east horizon and disappear in 10 seconds flat. The
drivers can start their cars again.
So are they UFOs, spirits, or a secret government project? With a truly
open mind to these phenomena, you will see that all are equally likely,
simply because the event gives no proof to any of these explainations. This
is not the case with crop circles. People have proven that man can make
crop circles. So that makes the hypothesis of crop circles being man made
more likely than aliens creating them.
Hmm.. maybe I should change my name to Spock. :)
Yours ever logically,
SW Spock.
[View Quote]"chucks party" <Chucks_Party at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3b898308 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Well all I can say is, we shall see, lol Unless you have seen a UFO you
don't
> know. I was skeptical somewhat too before I actually saw one. It was a
sphere,
> it moved in a perfectly straight line and glowed purple on a perfectly
clear
> summer nite. It was very far away but I don't think it was further away
than the
> moon, but it was very far from Earth. I have never seen anything like it
before
> or since. If you saw how fast this thing was going and the fact that it
was a
> perfect sphere with no tail at all you would believe too, trust me, lol
But
> until then all I can say is, keep looking up :) Oh and 1 more thing I find
> fascinating is why the government blacks out reports of UFO sightings and
> information they have aquired, why are they unwilling to give us the truth
and
> act like there is some kind of coverup going on. If there was really
nothing
> there what would they have to hide then?
>
>
|
Aug 28, 2001, 1:13am
His story is about 6 or 8 lines below this one.
SW Chris
[View Quote]"sw chris" <chrisw10 at nckcn.com> wrote in message
news:3b8a6e48$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Um, actually some "abductions" as you call them are unexplainable. :)
>
> SW Chris
>
> "goober king" <rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu> wrote in message
> news:3B897045.5020309 at acsu.buffalo.edu...
> tell, it
> would they
> biodegradable
to
> change
> They are
> you think
> along,
so
> much, I
> know the
> alone here
see
stupidity
ponds
melted?
>
>
|
Aug 25, 2001, 6:41pm
Can the personal crap. I understand your reasons for not liking that world
or the people who run it, but PLEASE don't burden the rest of us with it.
We've heard it enough times that you can go preach it to someone else and
you won't be missing any opportunities to spread the proverbial good news.
SW Chris
[View Quote]"jfk2 builder" <jfk2 at jfkmusic.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9108A5FEEB031jfk2jfkmusiccom at 166.90.181.12...
> And even i have to say i'm guilty now... As in if you visit my UNDER
> CONSTRUCTION for my home on AW 'JFK2's Hideout From Himself Home" on
> the Rast Road in AW you will see my teleport center. And i just put a
> click teleport to the Broadway World [actually it takes you to VOID
> World... Even that world is alot more entertaining than Broadway World
> will ever be] lol
>
>
> "jfk2 builder" <jfk2 at jfkmusic.com> wrote in
> news:Xns91084C383C578jfk2jfkmusiccom at 166.90.181.12:
>
|
Aug 25, 2001, 6:44pm
I thought Visual Basic depended on runtimes found in windows to translate
the commands written in VB-code to 1's and 0's? If this is true, then an OS
written in VB can't run without windows... unless he's somehow programmed
the runtimes into the OS. And I don't think that is possible. How odd.. a
VisualBasic OS. hehe. Ask him to send me a copy.
SW Chris
[View Quote]"lanezeri" <Lanezeri at stuff-x.com> wrote in message
news:3b87fa99$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> These are ALL t-grams from CompuFreak:
>
> no boot disk involved, windows doesn't load on its own
>
> I did make an OS, I made it in VB, it is entirely self contained, and it
> allows you to write and run programs in its own language
>
> plus, it doesn't have to control the entire system to be an OS, it only
has
> to provide some control of it to the program running within it in addition
> to providing some functionality not available without the OS
>
> umm.... I had a computer that ran DOS, and I installed windows.. it starts
> up in DOS as before and I do type a command line to load windows
>
> my OS does not run dos or windows programs so it is NOT A SHELL
>
> besides, where in the definition of an operating system does it say that
it
> can't run inside another operating system?
>
> and what about emulators? yuo can emulate a macintosh inside windows.....
it
> MacOS no longer an operating system???
>
>
|
Aug 25, 2001, 11:41pm
How true, how true. =P
SW Chris
[View Quote]"kah" <kah at kahbot.com> wrote in message
news:3b8840be$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> you could regard it as an OS, at least if you regard any version of
Windows
> an OS... Windows is just a nice little GUI and command line interpreter
for
> DOS...
>
> KAH
>
> "lanezeri" <Lanezeri at stuff-x.com> wrote in message
> news:3b8833cc$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
says
> software
piece
> of
> Windows,
> then
How
contained,
it
in
> it
> say
>
>
|
Aug 27, 2001, 2:26pm
I think we're having some problems with the definitions of the term
Operating System, Shell, and what Windows really is.
DOS is an operating system. Windows is built upon DOS. You can bypass
Windows and boot to the command prompt (DOS). You can shut down Windows and
return to DOS mode from Windows. Windows ME runs a DOS emulator, not DOS
itself, although they are essentially the same thing.
I think Windows is not a shell because it is built upon DOS. Windows does
not run inside of it, like x-Windows for UNIX or Linux. However I don't
think it is an operating system either, because it needs DOS to run.
So what is MacOS 10? MacOS 9 is an operating system, because it wasn't
built upon anything and doens't need another operating system to run. But
now MacOS 10 has a command line. :) However it's still an OS for the same
reasons Mac OS 9 is an OS. Simply because you can run DOS or exit to DOS
from inside Windows doesn't make it a shell.
SW Chris
[View Quote]"nova" <n at n.com> wrote in message
news:3b8a5b26$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> windows any version of from 1.0 to even xp is still built on a dos base
> WinMe is defently a shell win 9.x is a shell and win2k is a shell.
> there are way to see this you can strip all the gui away and it will still
> run.
> You can boot to a comand prompt only for one you cant do that in non
shell
> os.
> i havent seen xp but like the rest i kinda figure it to has a comand promt
> only mode and even if it doest that doesnt meen that dos isnt there just
> meens it harder to get at.
> "kah" <kah at kahbot.com> wrote in message
> news:3b898b03$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> reality!
> from
it
> that
TOO
a
> little
without
> DOS
> think
Windows
> that
try
> to
> even
I
> don't
post..
> to
> KAH..
> the
> up...
about)
> Simply
an
tell
>
>
|
Aug 27, 2001, 10:57pm
Some programming computer courses require you to learn how to program in
DOS. Windows is niether an operating system, nor a shell.
SW Chris
[View Quote]"lanezeri" <Lanezeri at stuff-x.com> wrote in message
news:3b8ad73e$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Okay smart ass.. you create a program FROM DOS.. and I'll bow down and
kiss
> your feet..
>
> Didn't think you could..
>
> --
>
> Lanezeri
> Lead Bot Programmer at Stuff-X
> http://aw.stuff-x.com
>
> "wing" <bathgate at prodigy.net> wrote in message
> news:3b8aa82c$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> news:3b8aa68d at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> EXE
>
>
|
Aug 29, 2001, 2:13am
Um... because linux stands alone from windows and DOS?
[View Quote]"lanezeri" <Lanezeri at stuff-x.com> wrote in message
news:3b8af0e3$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Since you are stupid as well.. here is the e-mail KAH got back typed
> completely by my friend.. he knows more than anyone who even reads this
NG..
>
> <E-Mail to KAH>
> Then try to explain why i wrote a complete linux system that exists
> completely on its own, using no api functions or permissions from windows,
> but runs from and at the same time as windows. Actually if you would take
> the time to learn what the fuck you are talking about before judging
someone
> else you might be able to make a valid point. The new generation of
windows
> doesnt even run dos, it runs a dos emulator to be backwards compatable.
When
> dos first started it was a stand alone with just a windows shell, that i
> will give you, but incase you havent noticed yet (obviously you havent)
> windows is now the stand alone and dos is just emulated so that lamers
like
> you can still run your ancient assed programs. Just for your personal
info,
> (since you seem to be such a lame ass), win 3.1,95,and 98 were actually a
> GUI (if you know what the hell that even means) Win ME changed to being a
> stand alone. So all this bullshit about windows being a shell and an
> operating system are from idiots, its a GUI dumbfucks.
>
>
>
>
>
> Love ya lots,
>
> Lanezeri
> Written by Deisel79 (who is obviously more talented than thou)
>
> <End E-Mail>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Kristian A. Hiorth
> To: lanezeri
> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 3:44 PM
> Subject: Re: Another Question
>
>
> man, I can't believe how stupid you are! it's not Fing possible to run
an
> OS
> on top of another!!!!!!!!!!!!! you can run two OSes on one machine, but
> not
> at the same time! and as Wing said, that stuff is perfectly possible on
> DOS,
> but what do you know? I bet you don't even know HOW to use DOS! without
> Windows, DOS is still the same, just without a piece of software, just
> like
> if you removed WordPerfect from a DOS machine (FYI WordPerfect used to
be
> what Word is now)...
>
> KAH
>
>
|
Aug 29, 2001, 2:18am
Oh geez lane, it's not a question of what it physically is... it's a
question of terminology. It always has been. We are all operating on
different definitions of the terms Operating System, Shell, and GUI. So if
you are so all-knowledgeable, please, tell us.... what are the official
definitions of those terms so that we may correctly place Windows into its
proper category?
SW Chris
[View Quote]"lanezeri" <Lanezeri at stuff-x.com> wrote in message
news:3b8c26fd at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I know.. what the hell does what JFK2's post have to do with the e-mail my
> friend sent KAH?
>
> --
>
> Lanezeri
> Lead Bot Programmer at Stuff-X
> http://aw.stuff-x.com
>
> "mike zimmer" <zimmer at pitnet.net> wrote in message
> news:3b8c1c4b at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> to
has
> telnet
EXE
> space
like
any
most
got
> www.simtel.net
back
> mostly
of
> Software
ftp://something.edu/pub/pc/software/packages/ms-dos/
> =
I
but
using
> a
> Others
typed
exists
if
about
point.
a
now
can
info,
to
> machine,
> used
>
>
|
Aug 29, 2001, 7:48pm
As long as we get the "official" definitions I don't care who answers it.
:)
SW Chris
[View Quote]"lanezeri" <Lanezeri at stuff-x.com> wrote in message
news:3b8cd24f at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> My friend sent that.. not me.. so he'd have to answer it..
>
> --
>
> Lanezeri
> Lead Bot Programmer at Stuff-X
> http://aw.stuff-x.com
>
> "sw chris" <chrisw10 at nckcn.com> wrote in message
> news:3b8c6d2a at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> if
its
e-mail
> my
degree.
> tricker
It
extracting
drive
games
play
i've
> 1995
> MS-DOS
56k
that...
> reads
> from
Actually
dos
> was
but
is
you
> ME
> windows
GUI
thou)
> possible
> DOS!
> of
WordPerfect
>
>
|
Aug 29, 2001, 7:51pm
You just kind of sound like one when you post. =) In general conversation
you're really rather grounded.
SW Chris
[View Quote]"jfk2 builder" <jfk2 at jfkmusic.com> wrote in message
news:Xns910CA1B19A0BBjfk2jfkmusiccom at 166.90.181.12...
> I always try to act a little less of a whackjob everyday....
> and i'm NOT mentally anything either. I'm 1000% of sound mind. Even
> JI will tell you that. When my good friend eventually gets up the nerve
> to discover these NGS and sets the software up correct to get them will
> tell you i'm not a whackjob either... [My good friend = My nextdoor
> neighbor]
>
>
> "sw comit" <sam64 at jps.net> wrote in
> news:3b8d3bb2 at server1.Activeworlds.com:
>
|
Sep 5, 2001, 2:10pm
Eh, you sure don't act like your 31....
SW Chris
[View Quote]"jfk2 builder" <jfk2 at jfkmusic.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9112D5A739DEAjfk2jfkmusiccom at 166.90.181.12...
> Geesh.... Just In.... You did have to point out i'm no math whiz as
> well as my lousy spelling.... BUT i am then 100% of sound mind. And
> if i was to have 1000% more improvement... WOW... I would be
> smarter than everyone INCLUDING Just In. Will those numbers about fit
> there Just in? Actually i am VERY smart. But in some ways i am very
> dumb. Take some of the university professors. Some of them can and are
> whizes when they teach in some university. But in some common things
> they turn out very dumb and what may appear to everyone downright
> stupid. I'm alot like them in some ways. A whiz in some respects but
> again downright stupid in others. And i know that no one here can say
> that they are the worlds smartest person. Not even Just In and I can
> say that. Goober and Just in are both smart in using words and i'm dumb
> there. Goober and Just In can build better than i can [heck... Anyone
> can build better than i can except for my friend Eric with his 2.2
> browser] But Just In can build and create things better than 99% of
> anyone in AW And there is one area that Just In knows what i'm refering
> to on AW where his artistic talents show. With me i'm smart in other
> ways and both Goober & Just In live so far away from me that can't ever
> hope to see what it is. Or have they been in the few that have ever
> seen me at my finest. I LOVE to TEACH. And have tought many on setting
> up & running a BBS, Games, how to build in AW, how to be an admin of
> newsgroups [moderator] and yes... -- NewsPro -- Newsgroups server. and
> i love to be a BETA TESTER -- Hostile Space On-Line Game now in Wide
> Beta and i was one of the 100 or so Alpha Testers PLUS i'm into Music
> Review web sites. That is something where you listen to many songs and
> rate them & after that it takes about 6 weeks before you hear them on
> the REAL radio. And i'm one of the best there as i have my experiance
> from 1960+ listening to a veried & wide different music. [Must be it
> helps to be a DJ as well]. YES... I'm proud to say i helped OneSummer
> in her speaking with a microphone BEFORE Danny 2K arrived on Broadway.
> I'm PROUD to say i tought NEO1 how to set up & be DJ of his own radio &
> SPEAK properly using a microphone & now he is as good an Internet Radio
> DJ as most others out there. So while i'm SMART in some places... I'm
> dumb in others. Do i ask for help? Yes. Do i get it? Most of the time
> it's NO or don't bug me i'm too busy or go bother someone else. I
> allways take the time to teach what little i know so someone else can
> at least get started and grow with that while i'm left to try and seek
> the right type of teacher to help me in AW or any other universe i may
> be in. [NO... It's NOT A MENTAL DOC TEACHER lol] But if you look all
> around in AW... It sure dosen't show. All that shows is i'm still a
> lousy builder. Does it show SMARTS? Yes if you count all the other
> teaching i do that is not direct AW related but helps the community of
> AW out in some way. So with me i'm shy on asking and so i do little
> DUMB things that eventually get someone teed and sooner or later an all
> out nasty war ensues and everyone wishes that the only one i teach is
> myself to just fly away forever and ever.
>
> "just in" <justefyde at hotmail.com> wrote in
> news:3b927467 at server1.Activeworlds.com:
>
|
Sep 5, 2001, 7:56pm
So much for that theory. =P I don't think he's lying about his age. :)
SW Chris
[View Quote]"jfk2 builder" <jfk2 at jfkmusic.com> wrote in message
news:Xns91139F1D4327Djfk2jfkmusiccom at 166.90.181.12...
> Thank You for saying that. I know i DON'T ACT like i'm 31...
> That is because i'm alot older and alot smarter than a 31 yr old is.
> I'm 51 and that means i'm really smart and have lots of sound mind.
> lol
>
> "sw chris" <chrisw10 at nckcn.com> wrote in
> news:3b964e64 at server1.Activeworlds.com:
>
|
Aug 29, 2001, 2:01am
> <rant>
> Unfortunately if you have an employee - he represents your company
whenever he talks in public. There is a very strict rules for an employee
what he can and can not tell on a public forum and the employer IS
responsible for his/her actions. It is the employers responsibility to keep
his/her employees within a well defined range in public relations.
Does this include even when they are off the clock? Because if so, you
could have a major repression of (here it comes =P) Freedom of Speech on
your hands. And then there's the legal possibility of suing a corporation
because an employee backed into someone's car in the company parking lot.
:) In the broadest sense of this meaning of course...
SW Chris
Aug 29, 2001, 7:53pm
Try to go into yoru System Control Panel--> Device Manager to see if there's
a Yellow Exclamation point beside either your NIC or Soundcard.. whichever
one isn't working. If there is, it's probably an IRQ problem that you can
fix right in Windows by going into its properties--> Resources and changing
the IRQs or Basic Configuration around.
SW Chris
[View Quote]"alphabit phalpha" <cy-awards at home.com> wrote in message
news:3b8cfd93$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Thanks Tyrell:)
>
> I have a webcam plugged in that wasn't working either, I'll try removing
it
> and see if that helps.
> I also noticed I have a netword card and dialup adapter in properties and
> I'm thinking I don't need the dialup adapter since I'm on radio
> connectivity.
> I know...what a mess...LOL!
>
> "tyrell" <tyrell1 at sk.sympatico.ca> wrote in message
> news:3B8C9BA9.50FAC9FF at sk.sympatico.ca...
> My fix
> was my
USB
> 3 and
in
need
I
> have
> have to
> NIC
> this
> bios
>
>
|
|
