|
|
brandon // User Search
brandon // User Search
Jun 28, 2001, 9:50pm
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4616.200" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>oops.....oh look at this html (that
works)</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
Jun 28, 2001, 9:51pm
what the.....oh well as you can tell ive never posted html is a NG before
lol
Jun 28, 2001, 11:54pm
ohh i found it in options send under newsgroup you check send in HTML :)
thanks
[View Quote]wing <bathgate at prodigy.net> wrote in message
news:3b3bd8ac at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Newsreaders such as OE that actually support HTML do it automatically if
you select a certain mode somewhere that I will not mention
> for fear of someone like you trying it.
> "brandon" <brandon at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:3b3bc2f1$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
before
>
>
|
Jul 5, 2001, 11:57pm
i could see that posting in html would be ok if you had html code to type
but just chnaging the font with tons of html is bad
[View Quote]tony m <tony at triton-dynamics.iwarp.com> wrote in message
news:3b45119d at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> In the future, please don't post in HTML =)
>
>
|
Jul 7, 2001, 6:36pm
I just got a great idea for a command- something like activate telegram
name=Brandon
Which would force a telegram window up to go to the named person, a good
idea for putting them on mailbox objects or contact by clicking here signs.
Well your probly thinking them poeple would force tons of telegram windows
up using something like create telegram or bump telegram.... Well the
easiest solution to that is disable that that way it will only work when the
person clicks it, and an extra feature could be multiple recpients or course
with a limit of...id say 5. Also some nice AFK features wouldnt hurt :)
Jul 8, 2001, 12:18am
umm...then make it a citezin only command lol
[View Quote]wing <bathgate at prodigy.net> wrote in message
news:3b4780c3 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> One problem: Tourists.
> "brandon" <brandon at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:3b4772d3 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
signs.
windows
the
course
>
>
|
Jul 8, 2001, 2:14am
exactly (which all of my worlds do becuase no public building), plus isnt it
just easier to CLICK once?
[View Quote]tony m <tony at triton-dynamics.iwarp.com> wrote in message
news:3b47c83d$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> what if you cant right click in the world (i.e.: its disabled)?
>
> j b e l l <jbell1983 at home.com> wrote in message
> news:3b47c4e0 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> telegram them manually?
>
>
|
Jul 8, 2001, 8:14pm
then in that case nm this whole thread, it was just an idea :)
[View Quote]wing <bathgate at prodigy.net> wrote in message
news:3b48ba06 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I believe (it would be most efficient to) that AW's command parser is
completely seperate from the citnum. This means, that every
> time we trigger an action, whether it be create, bump or activate, our
browser would neccessitate checking our citnum to be sure
> that we are allowed to actually send telegrams. This would probably slow
down the interface (Correct me if I'm wrong about that) and
> potentially allow tourists to send telegrams via cracked browsers.
> "brandon" <brandon at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:3b47c2e9$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
telegram
good
the
when
or
:)
>
>
|
Jul 10, 2001, 9:53pm
what else is new lol
Brandon
[View Quote]eep <eep at tnlc.com> wrote in message news:3B4B886B.A7A69355 at tnlc.com...
> It helps to read past posts here. This has been wanted for YEARS, among a
billion other things that'll never be implemented so long as Rick and JP
(AWC's clueless suits) are in charge...
>
> kmissile583k wrote:
>
for
vandals
>
|
Jul 20, 2001, 1:26am
good idea....now good luck getting them to do it
[View Quote]methus <e_robertg at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3B579106.73910670 at hotmail.com...
> I don't know if this has been said before or not but I'm going to say it
> anyways. I have an idea about a full screen mode for AW that operates
> the same way Internet Explorer's does. If this is possible this could
> be used to make the left bar, the top and even the chat bar to hide
> until they are needed. All the user would have to do is put the mouse
> pointer over the area of the menu and it would roll out and then roll
> back in when not in use. Also the top bar needs some cleaning up
> especially for people with lower resolutions so they can see more avatar
> function buttons. That could be fixed by using a smaller font. If this
> is possible I think it would be a great addition for AW 3.2 or later. I
> have included a manipulated screenshot of AW 2.2 and IE to give you a
> view of what I am thinking.
>
> Methus
>
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Jul 31, 2001, 3:53pm
the current way isway less insecure. To solve the prlblem if people give out
their ppws to ton sof people is to have one checkbox where you can enter a
password (or not) and another checkbox to add authorized citezins. That way
you can:
a) use a password the way we currently do it
b)use no password and only let certain citnumbers use your privleges
c)have an authorized citezin list BUT they also have to know your ppw
[View Quote]"captain mad mike" <cmadmike at crosswinds.net> wrote in message
news:3b66ea54$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> But then you have to add and remove the cits constantly. I find it easier
> and more secure to use passwords (and AW better add in the ability to view
> who is on your ppw and be able to kick them off)
> "kmissile583k" <Kmissile58 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:3b66e6f5$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
lot
> of
> the
just
to
ppws
one
> don't
>
>
|
Jul 31, 2001, 6:34pm
you wouldnt NEED to chnage your ppw if ths was inplemented. Becuase only
people you WANT can use your privileges. THats much easier then chnaging
your ppw constantly
[View Quote]"kah" <kah at kahbot.com> wrote in message
news:3b66f2dd at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> no, to be able to change your PPW is more secure. I think your idea is
> stupid. Sorry, but that's my opinion :-)) and what about bots, heh?
>
> KAH
>
> "kmissile583k" <Kmissile58 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:3b66edf8$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
is
> to
> easier
> view
a
secret
> by
> enter
they
> and
any
> you
the
hassle,
>
>
|
Jul 31, 2001, 6:34pm
oh...i didnt ether....
[View Quote]"kmissile583k" <Kmissile58 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3b670521$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I didn't think about the bots...
>
>
> "kah" <kah at kahbot.com> wrote in message
> news:3b66f2dd at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> is
way
to
ourselves
> a
> secret
priviledge
> they
ppws
you
> any
where
> the
> hassle,
>
>
|
Aug 5, 2001, 5:57pm
why dont YOU? Shutup and stop trying to make people do things becuase you
tell them too. He can say whatever the hell he wants. It was just a
suggestion.
-Brandon
[View Quote]"lanezeri" <Lanezeri at yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3b6d88c0 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Why don't you? Don't say others can do things if you can do it as well..
do
> it.. if you want it then do it..
>
> "trekkerx" <troop2 at empirenet.com> wrote in message
> news:3B6C9B6A.EFB1C103 at empirenet.com...
> 2, 3, or
> the bird
> bot
> ask
> to
> when i
more
> bots
>
>
|
Aug 5, 2001, 6:46pm
lol...a god
[View Quote]"lanezeri" <Lanezeri at yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3b6db066 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Why the hell should I make it? I didn't want it... if he suggests
something
> then it should be in the wishlist now shouldn't it? YOU shut up and stop
> thinking you are a god...
>
> "brandon" <brandon at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message
> news:3b6da510 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
you
> well..
select
> 1,
> get
> buy
> kindly
> enough
because
any
>
>
|
Aug 5, 2001, 6:47pm
and it IS in the wishlist :)
[View Quote]"lanezeri" <Lanezeri at yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3b6db066 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Why the hell should I make it? I didn't want it... if he suggests
something
> then it should be in the wishlist now shouldn't it? YOU shut up and stop
> thinking you are a god...
>
> "brandon" <brandon at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message
> news:3b6da510 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
you
> well..
select
> 1,
> get
> buy
> kindly
> enough
because
any
>
>
|
Aug 6, 2001, 11:57am
so basicly those who dont host there own worlds cant run a bot.....or have
to pay the person who hosts their world extra for hosting bots
[View Quote]"eep" <eep at tnlc.com> wrote in message news:3B6E572F.74A331DF at tnlc.com...
> I mean the world server, not the browser (which could just have the GUI to
CONTROL/CONFIGURE--or as a separate program--the plugins). Regardless, that
separate GUI program would NOT have to be run all the time, unlike bots do
now, since the "bots" (plugins) would be a part of the world server and run
alongside it seamlessly like Web browser plugins do.
>
> Next time please reply to the original post.
>
> data21 wrote:
>
the
and
>
|
Aug 6, 2001, 11:58am
and another thing this isnt a wishlist topic
[View Quote]"data21" <dbmiller at kiski.net> wrote in message
news:3b6e4eb1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Bots are best as separate programs. If they where integrated into the
> browser then we would have to stay logged in to AW all the time just for
> some of up to keep out 24/7 bots running. having the bot in a separate
> program like they are now means we don't have to be in AW just to keep the
> bots running, saves on PC resources, and on people thinking you rude not
> answering telegrams or letting them join you not knowing your sleeping and
> just keeping your 24/7 bot running.
>
>
|
Aug 7, 2001, 3:07am
most likely....hmm..any minute now
[View Quote]"jerme" <JerMe at nc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:3b6f72ae$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Hmm... wonder if Eep will bitch about the previous post (and this one)
being
> off topic.... lol
>
> --
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Jeremy Booker
> JTech Web Systems
> (www.JTechWebSystems.com -- Coming Soon)
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> "rattleman" <djrch at worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
> news:3b6f343c at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Aug 10, 2001, 4:17pm
personaly i dont care if people posted a 1 meg post......ok so if you were
56k that like 56 k a second right? so it takes about....3 second right? WOW
BIG DEAL
[View Quote]"ryan." <RyanBirkin at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3b738f31 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> WITH THEASE F-ING PEOPLE F-ING SHUT UP ABOUT THERE F-ING HTML AND RULES IM
> F-ING SICK OH U PEOPLE F-ING SHUT UP (its ok rattlman there jsut ean
> people!)
> the derek <ImTheDerek at yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:3B7361B8.36B87E07 at yahoo.com...
>
>
|
Aug 25, 2001, 12:09am
I think we need to be able to chnge t to something besides immagration
officer....
--
- Brandon
(website coming soon)
World: A'Dude
Co-owned world: Safira
Aug 25, 2001, 3:26am
and of course it will onyl show in my browser so whats the point
[View Quote]"tony m" <fldmshl2013 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3b872256.107557152 at news.activeworlds.com...
> you can by editing the Message Files.....
>
> On 24 Aug 2001 22:09:31 -0400, "brandon" <brandon at my.activeworlds.com>
> wrote:
>
>
|
Aug 25, 2001, 4:27am
ya..that would be cool...*dreams of a day when AW actualy implements the
stuff we want*
[View Quote]"the derek" <ImTheDerek at yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3B873888.D414C76B at yahoo.com...
> im getting tired of the same old type and same old
> black grey and bold colors i think world owners
> should be able to decide the following things in
> their world:
> size/font/color for tourists
> size/font/color for citizens
> size/font/color for PS
> and a new one size/font/color for caretaker
|
Nov 4, 2001, 11:31pm
ooohh i had no idea that a CHATLOG program would actually make CHAT LOGS!!!!
[View Quote]"ananas" <vha at oct31.de> wrote in message news:3BE5AA5F.A5053CB0 at oct31.de...
> I guess his idea is to make chat logs CIA proof :)
>
> agent1 wrote:
news:3be59487 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
password and copy&paste and they should make it with no ways to edit the
chatlog or
it into that program...
>
> --
> "_
> |
> /\
> \ /
> __/ /_
|
Nov 5, 2001, 4:38pm
oh my god.....i just cannot believe you do not know that chat log programs
are for recording chat logs....C-H-A-T L-O-G-S
rather then doing it yourself people would make a bot log in and record the
chat on command instead or all the time...
[View Quote]"bowen" <bowen at omegauniverse.com> wrote in message
news:3be61345 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Ok I'm lost on what this whole thing is.. and what brandon is trying to
say.
>
> --Bowen--
>
> "brandon" <brandon at fake-email-adresses.com> wrote in message
> news:3be5fa17$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> LOGS!!!!
> news:3BE5AA5F.A5053CB0 at oct31.de...
> pasting
>
>
|
Nov 5, 2001, 7:14pm
its not the fact that aw does it for you....its that bots can do it when
your not logged in or in that pirticular world
[View Quote]"bowen" <bowen at omegauniverse.com> wrote in message
news:3be6ef3b$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> OK then, let me tell you that AW MAKES CHAT LOGS. Sorry but I can't
handle
> people that tell me I'm stupid then don't realize that you can do it with
a
> click of a few buttons. And you can stop it very easily when you're done.
> That is why I didn't understand why you'd need another program to do it
for
> you.
>
> --Bowen--
>
> "brandon" <brandon at fake-email-adresses.com> wrote in message
> news:3be6eabf at server1.Activeworlds.com...
programs
> the
to
> the
>
>
|
Nov 6, 2001, 2:22pm
yes you are absolutly right...but a chatlog program could add a few extra
features, so you never know, it could actually be a good program
[View Quote]"bowen" <bowen at omegauniverse.com> wrote in message
news:3be713fa at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Then use a bot, simple as that.. there's no need for another program to be
> written when a bot can do it. Xelagot for example, they can make
chatlogs.
>
> --Bowen--
>
> "brandon" <brandon at fake-email-adresses.com> wrote in message
> news:3be70f5f$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> with
> done.
it
> record
trying
> CHAT
> and
> edit
> and
>
>
|
Nov 6, 2001, 3:48pm
i can write bots but i wouldn't know what kind of features people would
want. Plus i'm too lazy to start any bots right now :)
[View Quote]"bowen" <bowen at omegauniverse.com> wrote in message
news:3be82cc1$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Maybe one of the great bot writers could throw something together like
that.
> With some extra features.
>
> --Bowen--
>
> "brandon" <brandon at fake-email-adresses.com> wrote in message
> news:3be81c5f$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
extra
to
> be
> when
can't
it
you're
do
log
make
> name
> to
> copying
>
>
|
Nov 6, 2001, 5:06pm
still....i wouldn't know what 'features' to add and then those features
would be more programming
[View Quote]"bowen" <bowen at omegauniverse.com> wrote in message
news:3be831bc$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> LoL there's not too much I can think a chatbot would need.
>
> --Bowen--
>
> "brandon" <brandon at fake-email-adresses.com> wrote in message
> news:3be83074$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
program
> it
> do
> to
chat
> and
> is
message
actually
> citizen
> ways
>
>
|
Nov 18, 2001, 2:40pm
cant you use VB scripts to log bots in? ive never used them so i wouldnt
know
[View Quote]"evil overlord" <bob at thespire.net> wrote in message
news:3bf775cc$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> This would be a cool idea imho, for people running small 'communities' in
AW
> could set up web apps for people to get space in their area.
> For example:
>
> Mr Bob runs this town called Bobville, he has it divided into 100X100
Meter
> Sections, with each section covered by some groundcover to prevent
> vandalism/etc.
>
> Mr Joe comes along and wants to build here, so he goes to the website,
fills
> out some app, picks where he wants to build, and if approved the perl/cgi
> script automagiclly deletes Mr Bob's ground cover, and somehow covers it
> with Mr Joe groundcover, using cit privilages maybe?.
>
>
|
|
