|
|
strike rapier // User Search
strike rapier // User Search
Dec 26, 2002, 12:34am
Ill tell em you said that when I get back to school in a few weeks >:P
I know in the UK the laws on the data are very very stict and measures have
been brought in to ensure that privacy is maintained.
- Mark
[View Quote]"baron" <pk39srt at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.18747db64660ee8a98968a at news.activeworlds.com...
> In article <3e0a4dcd at server1.Activeworlds.com>,
strike at rapiercom.freeserve.co.uk says...
data
the
only
lawfull
each
private
>
> Sorry to break it for you or your teachers but that's complete bull, terms
like "accidentally", "best of their ability" are way too vague to be taken
seriously. EULAs have never been challenged in a court AFAIK but to me they
override anything, they are contracts between you and a company...anyway
that's a local law issue; they are vague by definition and they cover all
cases that's why many refer to them as COB.
>
> The net offers zero privacy, period. I have worked long enough for an ISP
to know :)
>
> --
> Baron
|
Dec 26, 2002, 1:15am
Yes... I fail to see the problem with this course of action?
- Mark
"sk8man1" <Gzanone at optonline.net> wrote You'd have to get like UKs
> special forces to come in and smuggle the owner of AW out of the country
Dec 26, 2002, 8:04pm
Remember, they can simply block the person...
Never ever link private communications.
- Mark
[View Quote]"technozeus" <TechnoZeus at techie.com> wrote in message
news:3e0aec1b$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Then how about a way that someone with eject privs could request
permission to view your incomming and outgoing whispers? A person being
harrassed could grant such permission, causing whisper messages to be echoed
to the person who made the request, until one of the two turned that
function off.
>
> TechnoZeus
>
> "sk8man1" <Gzanone at optonline.net> wrote in message
news:3e09a7af at server1.Activeworlds.com...
has
news:3E09895D.A82E3987 at oct31.de...
log
worlds
that
>
>
|
Dec 25, 2002, 5:33pm
Which would plaster your face to 45 degrees.... bump maybe though,
- Mark
[View Quote]"john" <johnf_the_great at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3e09abcc at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I've just been reading about pitch in 3.4 in the SDK NG (to do with bots),
I
> think we should have:
>
> create pitch 135, which makes you look up, or create pitch 45, which makes
> you look down. This would be a brilliant function as i'm sure a lot of
> people know the problems when running down huge flights of stairs too fast
> with walls in front............ a lil run here, hover, walk on air, land,
> run, hover, walk, land, etc.
>
> Hehe
>
> ~John
>
>
|
Dec 26, 2002, 8:01pm
Thats what Bonzi Buddy says 2 ;)
- Mark
[View Quote]"ryan jacob" <ryan_jacob at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3e0b5a29$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I don't see how simple hardware settings could be a breach of privacy
> provided personal details like IP address, etc. are not provided.
Anonymous
> user statistics never hurt anyone.
>
> Ryan Jacob
>
> "andras" <andras at andras.net> wrote in message
> news:3e0b57fb at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> breach of privacy. I am not recommending to do that.
> settings/hardware description should be a must IMHO.
>
>
|
Dec 26, 2002, 8:00pm
about a million times...
Oi Shamus, get to it plz. lol
- Mark
[View Quote]"john" <johnf_the_great at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3e0b6aff at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> It has
> "ryan jacob" <ryan_jacob at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:3e0b6ab7 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> bars,
>
>
|
Jan 4, 2003, 12:37pm
No it shouldent thats why theyre hidden cause the SDK would go insane!
- Mark
[View Quote]"shred" <shred at myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:3e165c57 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
|
Jan 4, 2003, 5:33pm
It does, you see them connect etc to the world server, but invisible is
merly not needing a physical location in world so it dosent declair itself
as having 1 with aw_state_change the second it does its not invisible any
more, but keeping em invisible so they dont start filling up worlds etc, I
dont see a prob.
- Mark
[View Quote]"ncc 71854" <NCC-71854 at USS-Venture.Starfleet.UFP> wrote in message
news:3e173433$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> At least the World server should show them somehow.
>
> "strike rapier" <strike at rapiercom.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:3e16f1b3 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Jan 5, 2003, 11:10am
Of course they can, the property data exists at 'world' level, not
'physical' level so can be edited while invis.
- Mark
[View Quote]"d a n" <awdan at aol.com> wrote in message
news:3e175bb8 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Hope im not causing a problem here, but as noticing Hamfon's BuildBot
> whether its available still, it updates property when its invisible i
think,
> or all bots, even without ct, can update property :\
>
> ---
> D a n
>
>
>
|
Jan 5, 2003, 3:50pm
I meant because where would the AVATAR_X, AVATAR_Y, AVATAR_Z, AVATAR_TILT,
AVATAR_ROLL, AVATAR_YAW, come from, as well as session targeting for
commands such as aw_whisper, aw_console_msg, etc
- Mark
[View Quote]"tony m" <ag5v1u7001 at sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:h3ng1vo03udns6ns4m7178oqd326u3et55 at 4ax.com...
> Ummm, I have yet to see the SDK itself crash (not the application) from
the thousands of avatar_change events it receives. Or any other high-load
event.
>
> Try again.
>
> On 4 Jan 2003 09:37:39 -0500, "strike rapier"
<strike at rapiercom.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
|
Jan 5, 2003, 5:08pm
I still prefer invisible bots being invisible. Not like you cant track and
eject em if they build etc
- Mark
[View Quote]"tony m" <ag5v1u7001 at sneakemail.com> wrote in message
news:qtvg1vgg904s744so40a7k2ncfsbodbe6h at 4ax.com...
> On 5 Jan 2003 12:50:19 -0500, "strike rapier"
<strike at rapiercom.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>
AVATAR_TILT,
>
> These would either be 0 or NULL like Bowen suggested. The session number
would exist because it was assigned by the universe.
|
Jan 6, 2003, 7:41pm
They could change world features and rights, the second they delete an
object appart from with wipe all they give away their session and are open
to nuking.
- Mark
[View Quote]"shred" <shred at myrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:3e187dad at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> This is one of the reasons that I think that this should be implemented.
Since my world is hosted by a friend and I don't have immediate access to
the world log, it would be rather difficult for me to know whether there was
an invisible bot running in my world or not. There is also the issue of less
trustworthy worldhosters than mine simply adding themselves to the caretaker
list and running and invisible bot in the world in order to do whatever they
like without the worldowner suspecting anything.
>
> bowen wrote:
out his PPW
Global mode
>
|
Jan 9, 2003, 6:48pm
Mys bots own you :P
- Mark
[View Quote]"bowen" <thisguyrules at 7k2.4mg.com.ANTISPAM> wrote in message
news:3e1b8775 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
didn't think
> that Strike meant that the bots could be microwaved the death once they
showed
> themselves. It's an interesting idea, though. ^_^
>
> One could only wish they could microwave his bots...
>
> --Bowen--
>
>
|
Jan 12, 2003, 10:15am
it does because you dont do aw_login() again explicitly.
- Mark
[View Quote]"technozeus" <TechnoZeus at techie.com> wrote in message
news:3e20c47f$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> This one I can't test, because my contact list is full. If another beta
tester is reading this... please test for this bug in build 443 and in build
452 to see if it still exists in them too. I recall mention of it, but I'm
not sure what the status is. Anyone else able to reproduse this one in
build 419 (AW 3.3) ?
>
> TechnoZeus
>
> "ncc 71854" <NCC-71854 at USS-Venture.Starfleet.UFP> wrote in message
news:3e20abc8 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Jan 12, 2003, 10:17am
Let me get this correct...
You want to save space... so you replace a 1 byte character... with a 1
byte character o.0
The tag is static sized, or should be :o
Seriously, how can that cause you to have to format ur HD?
- Mark
[View Quote]"orb" <Sharon at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:3e20d1b7 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> While writing a list on a xaw2 we thought it would give us more character
> allowance if we left out spaces between each item on the list and put a
> comma between words. We added loads of words to the sign. The text got
> real small in the tag when gliding mouse over the sign. We didn't realize
> what effect this would have on our computers. 2 different computers
crashed
> over a dozen times because of it. I even had to reformat my hd
afterwards.
>
>
>
>
|
Jan 18, 2003, 9:13am
I wish you would make usefull posts or just go die somewhere...
- Mark
[View Quote]"jacob the hero" <jacob2000caca at yahoo.ca> wrote in message
news:3e27454e$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> They are Red and orange, yellow and green and blue and Purple! Can you
Work
> it? Alpha Tester! Next Relese: Aw 3.4 Build 454
>
>
> Jacob the hero
>
>
|
Jan 18, 2003, 9:12pm
No.. that was the point of my post..
[View Quote]"technozeus" <TechnoZeus at techie.com> wrote in message
news:3e29b337$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Did you even understand what he's asking for?
|
Jan 18, 2003, 9:53pm
Yes, but his origional post could mean 1 of a billion things, and we all
have to read it, so unless you can express your thoughts in a way everyone
(or at least the majority) can understand. BTW, the rotating hue's thing can
be done with astart texturing, rather like led1...
- Mark
[View Quote]"technozeus" <TechnoZeus at techie.com> wrote in message
news:3e29e273$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Ah, okay. Well, then I hope I've cleared that up for you. If not, let me
know and I'll do my best.
>
> TechnoZeus
|
Jan 20, 2003, 4:40am
Sorry, never going to happen.
- Mark
[View Quote]"maki" <maki at awmaki.com> wrote in message
news:3e2b647d$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> i wish you would go die somewhere.
>
> maki
|
Jan 20, 2003, 4:16pm
Yep :o
- Mark
[View Quote]"ncc 71854" <NCC-71854 at USS-Venture.Starfleet.UFP> wrote in message
news:3e2bcf8c at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Are you sure? You are saying you will live forever?
|
Jan 20, 2003, 8:08pm
Always a paradox that... People claim they can live forever.. but the uni
wont last forever?
- Mark
[View Quote]"technozeus" <TechnoZeus at techie.com> wrote in message
news:3e2c4d84 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Now that I would like to see... especially since that would mean I would
have to be around long enough to see it. :)
>
> TechnoZeus
>
> "strike rapier" <strike at rapiercom.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3e2c3cf0$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Jan 20, 2003, 8:39pm
Because Infinity is beyond human contemplation and im just being interesting
:o
- Mark
[View Quote]"kah" <kah at kahnews.cjb.net> wrote in message
news:Xns9309ED0794F3Akahatkahnewsdotcjbdo at 64.94.241.201...
> "strike rapier" <strike at rapiercom.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in
> news:3e2c736b at server1.Activeworlds.com:
>
uni
>
> Why not?
>
> KAH
|
Jan 17, 2003, 5:55pm
I thought that was already possable by setting them to zero in the CT
ejections box?
- Mark
[View Quote]"ncc 71854" <NCC-71854 at USS-Venture.Starfleet.UFP> wrote in message
news:3e2856b5 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Ejections by IP mask....i.e. 172.164.91.* or 172.164.*
>
>
|
Jan 19, 2003, 7:45pm
I think Magsy script (C lookalike) would be best
- Mark
[View Quote]"john" <johnf_the_great at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3e2afa02$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> It would be nice if there could be a scripting language for AW
>
> E.G.
>
> Sub CommandArrival
> if command = "open_account" then
> #Open account details here
> end if
> End Sub
>
> So that world owners could run RPGS from a server-side script. It would
run
> just like a bot except it would be a script on the server. Wouldn't
require
> much of a mod to the client.
>
>
|
Jan 20, 2003, 4:40am
Magsbot...
if(onething==anotherthing){
aw_say("Larda larda");
}
[View Quote]"john" <john at 3d-reality.com> wrote in message
news:3e2b2c82 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> mm, magsy script?
> "strike rapier" <strike at rapiercom.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:3e2b1c67 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
would
>
>
|
Jan 20, 2003, 4:16pm
o_0
if (aw_string(AW_AVATAR_NAME)=="Strike Rapier"){
aw_say("All hail the great 1, let me sacrafice myself to you!")
aw_exit()
}
[View Quote]"ncc 71854" <NCC-71854 at USS-Venture.Starfleet.UFP> wrote in message
news:3e2bd121$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> if(aw_avatar_add("strike rapier")){ aw_exit(); }
>
> "strike rapier" <strike at rapiercom.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:3e2b99de at server1.Activeworlds.com...
Wouldn't
>
>
|
Jan 20, 2003, 6:27pm
Cooincidently I doubt the SDK commands would *ever* be transfered to a
server side for things like direct browser control becasue it would present
a huge security risk.. I could call aw_term on you..
- Mark
[View Quote]"ncc 71854" <NCC-71854 at USS-Venture.Starfleet.UFP> wrote in message
news:3e2bd121$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> if(aw_avatar_add("strike rapier")){ aw_exit(); }
|
Jan 20, 2003, 4:35am
ummm... what are you on about?
You have the aw_wait on your primary thread, with your GUI (if you have 1)
running on the second. You use a 3rd thread for calculating events based on
global procedures and pass the arguments for things like aw_say(argv) to a
stacking que to be initiated though the main aw_wait loop o_0. But im sure
your dad understands that, ask him to explain to you.
- Mark
[View Quote]"jstone2004" <j at jlife.net> wrote in message
news:3e2b4735$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I am making a scheduling system with long running tasks, threads are the
> only way to do that. You see, I could write 1,000 lines of threads, or
> 10,000 lines of codes without threads... Which seems more economic?
>
> J
|
Jan 22, 2003, 6:01pm
its called....
support at activeworlds.com or for a few of us the beta ng.
-Makr
[View Quote]"john" <johnf_the_great at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3e2ef333 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I would like to see the "Bug.Report" NG for people to post bugs
>
>
|
|
