1  ...  15  16  17  18  19  20  ...  36  |   Order by default

Aug 23, 2003, 3:17pm

Uh, I smell a nice citizen ban coming on... yippy skittles.

-Joe

[View Quote]

Aug 23, 2003, 3:37pm

..... your point? uhh.... 999 would be an integer directly related to 666.
"9 9 9", or his citizen number 999, has nothing to do with 666, because they
weren't directly linked. That's just like saying, some microwaves cause
horrible genital cancer, so *all* microwaves must!

-Joe

[View Quote]

Aug 23, 2003, 5:02pm

Wow, the gothness is radiating off that. Kinda makes me want to wear insane
amounts of makeup, sit in my basement, and write horrible gothic poetry...

-Joe

[View Quote]

Aug 23, 2003, 5:36pm

Perhaps if it was "340666" or "347666" or something... but, no...

-Joe

[View Quote]

Aug 24, 2003, 7:45pm

http://www.fakeplastic.com/images/eh/awteen666.jpg

-Joe

[View Quote]

Aug 24, 2003, 7:51pm

Sometime around 1910 ;)

-Joe

[View Quote]

Aug 24, 2003, 8:03pm

But, I didn't... It downloaded whatever the default number of headers OE
downloads. I'm I really not that lazy? Seriously. I wouldn't care about
making AWTeen look like the "beast", it already does that on its own.

-Joe

[View Quote]

Aug 23, 2003, 9:02pm

Wow... you get a cookie.. for being creative... oh wait.... This has been
happening at AW GZ for a while now....

-Joe

[View Quote]

Aug 23, 2003, 11:34pm

You get a cookie too! :D

-Joe

[View Quote]

Aug 24, 2003, 7:43pm

Well, if you're too lazy to find out ways to exploit the software, and just
leech off others methods, then... That's just too bad.

-Joe

[View Quote]

Aug 24, 2003, 10:52pm

Because tons of people know about this "world features" bug before JohnF
decided to tell every damned person about it in the newsgroup. All he did
was try to look "l33t" and tell people that's why he got banned from the
uniserver, to prevent people from knowing what really happened. So, no, you
didn't find it yourself. As for finding your own now, good luck.

-Joe

[View Quote]

Aug 25, 2003, 7:35pm

Everyone finds bugs, the minute you start the browser up, you're bombarded
with bugs.

-Joe

[View Quote]

Aug 26, 2003, 1:10am

The number of horrible exploits for Xitami vs the number for apache, are
insane...

-Joe

[View Quote]

Aug 26, 2003, 1:11am

Uh, that's your opinion only. I've got two windows 2003 enterprise boxes
and one windows 2000 server. All three have no problems, and serve half a
terabyte to my network and the internet a month with no problem.

-Joe

[View Quote]

Aug 26, 2003, 1:41am

Yeah, Linux is awesome for serving on slower machines. :) I have a copy
running on a really slow machine doing network monitoring, IRC egging, and
some other crazy things. But, if you have the power there, and would like
something with a little bit more oomph, and patching the crap out of it...
eh ;)

-Joe

[View Quote]

Aug 26, 2003, 1:45am

Oh, sambar is really good, but the web administration is rather vulnerable.
:) Its a good webserver otherwise. Just don't give out your password. ;)
Also, ISS is ok, if you patch it, and disable a bunch of stuff, and remove
some default scripts, and have a trained monkey with a shotgun to shoot the
server if anyone hacks in...

-Joe

[View Quote]

Aug 26, 2003, 2:16am

Uh, is it safe to keep my credit card numbers in a text file on my desk top
called "credit numbers.txt"? I mean, its not on my webserver, it must be
safe!

-Joe

[View Quote]

Aug 26, 2003, 2:40am

All of my windows servers run monitorless just fine. :O

-Joe

[View Quote]

Aug 26, 2003, 2:38pm

Now, VNC is nice, but, I do prefer the virtual desktop.... I mean, who
wouldn't? Its so silky smooth... So, I guess I cant admin my machines
without a little bit of the ole' virtual desktop magic. ;)

-Joe

[View Quote]

Aug 26, 2003, 2:39pm

I guess something could be arranged. ;)

-Joe

[View Quote]

Aug 26, 2003, 7:33pm

A virtual desktop is a "virtual desktop" simply because it isn't the _real_
desktop of the machine (i.e. transported over the network using Windows
Terminal Services, VNC, etc, etc). A program that makes the illusion of
multiple desktops doesn't make "virtual desktops", because they are real to
that machine. VMWare isn't a "virtual desktop", because its an x86
emulator. Now, calling programs such as VNC a "remote administration tool",
is like calling a microwave a "device that could be used to hammer a nail
into the wall." or perhaps a popsicle a "really cold thing that can numb
the skin.". Just because admins use these to insecurely connect to their
boxes, doesn't mean that's their only use, and naming them so would just
turn people off from using them. These programs would fit better under the
title "Desktop remote control daemons.".

BSD sucks, try to get this "Tony" fellow to install Linux. Also, if you're
limited to a small set of commands, you've got to have a really, really bad
account. XP's commandline (dos), is only open for remote machine recovery,
I believe, or so it is on 2k3. But, DOS was very limited as a shell, bash,
tsh, and the like to a much better job (9000x better, that is). Running
scripts over a network connection is just asking for your machine to be
hacked. Also, there are a few windows SSH servers available. Perhaps KAH
can hook you up with his CYGWIN "uberness".

-Joe

[View Quote]

Aug 26, 2003, 9:54pm

Well, I mean, if you only want to use some simple stuff. There's like, a
million shells that will give you a crontab and a full account on the system
for free. And a plus, they're not hosting on BSD. ;)

-Joe

[View Quote]

Aug 27, 2003, 2:57am

Slackware is awesome, if you know what you're doing. But, redhat is the
easiest to install, and nicest on 64bit processors. Works like a charm on
my DEC box.

-Joe

[View Quote]

Aug 27, 2003, 5:11pm

Ok, uh, give them a $4 million advertising budget, and I guess they might do
it... That, or I'll blow it all on cheap shiny things.

-Joe

[View Quote]

Aug 27, 2003, 10:46pm

Try actually going there... heh... or, going to there... ... or... damnit,
just download www.there.com !

-Joe

[View Quote]

Aug 28, 2003, 2:32am

You wish. :) How are you going to tell me how long I've had the URL, when
you don't even know who I am? ;) I've had it looonggg before you signed up
for this silly public beta. :)

-Joe

[View Quote]

Aug 27, 2003, 9:39pm

Wouldn't windows 2003 expire in like, a few months anyway? ;) If you have a
copy, install windows 2000 professional, or whichever really. Then get
apache (if you have some time to figure it out, sambar if you want something
easy, or Xitami O.O), and install that. But, windows 98? ;)

-Joe

[View Quote]

Aug 27, 2003, 10:47pm

But, if you'd like a stable machine, you should look at 2000 a little closer
:O. But, personally, I ran windows 3.1 untill I upgraded to XP. :)

-Joe

[View Quote]

Aug 28, 2003, 7:29pm

Oh my god... Worst advice... ever... You get one of my coveted gold plated
cookies for that one.

-Joe

[View Quote]

Aug 28, 2003, 7:31pm

Perhaps you should get Admin-In-A-Can? But, be sure to get the version with
airholes in the can... You don't want to know about the other one.

-Joe

[View Quote]

1  ...  15  16  17  18  19  20  ...  36  |   Order by default