|
grimble // User Search
grimble // User Search
Jan 2, 2002, 7:52pm
You have GOT to be joking right?
[View Quote]"dotar sojat" <barsoom at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:3C337A0F.186961CC at my.activeworlds.com...
> Are they raiseing the price on the uniservers? I think if a big company
> could afford a uniserver then they might also be able to afford to
shoulder
> some of the burden being put on our backs.
>
> icey wrote:
>
>
|
Jan 2, 2002, 8:09pm
Man that is warped. Pay for what you use, don't expect to be subsidised by
those in a better position to pay. Has it occurred to you that maybe you're
just being asked to pay your way?? With less public cits AW has one less
revenue stream, but without the real business there IS NO AW!! Its not
difficult.
[View Quote]"dotar sojat" <barsoom at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:3C337F87.D369571D at my.activeworlds.com...
> Oh I know, they would never jepardize their revenue by charging those who
can
> afford to pay.
>
> grimble wrote:
>
company
them?
>
|
Jan 2, 2002, 8:42pm
Firstly this is only going to be an issue when your citizenship is next up
for renewal. That means that the vast majority of people bitching and crying
about this aren't even going to be affected for some time.
Secondly, citizens have been paying a pittance for AW since it was first
charged for ... $20 a year ... $1.65 a month. Its high time the "community"
paid their way.
Thirdly, high value "potential clients" don't often come from public forums
.... its called "Sales and Marketing" - corporations need to be SOLD things
like this, they rarely just land in your lap.
Also, I don't see any other way to read a statement like "I think if a big
company could afford a uniserver then they might also be able to afford to
shoulder some of the burden being put on our backs.". They have been
carrying you so far ... and you're asking for that to continue. I don't see
any reason why.
[View Quote]"dotar sojat" <barsoom at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:3C33861D.F54658AA at my.activeworlds.com...
> Oh and as for that subsidized by others issue. Its not even part of the
point. If
> AW was in financial straits they should have let us know long before this.
If they
> had, maybe somethign acceptable to all parties could have been arrived at
by now.
>
> dotar sojat wrote:
>
interest
havign to
subsidised by
you're
less
not
those who
to
with
>
|
Jan 2, 2002, 10:58pm
Read that how you will ... but its true all the same. The posts on the
petitions just go to show what an influx of braindead spoilt brats AW has
had to endure in recent months. A large number of them are Tourists who are
just pissed at not getting something for free anymore.
[View Quote]"icey" <icey at altavista.net> wrote in message
news:3C33A993.6090106 at altavista.net...
> This is beign negative to me...
>
>
> But right now, that's
> not happening, and these petitions are only making things worse....
>
>
|
Jan 3, 2002, 10:03pm
If its shit .... walk away!
[View Quote]"kah" <kah at kahnews.cjb.net> wrote in message
news:3c34c65a$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> wake up! they have to get someone else to pay more, because most ppl can't
> afford $114 a year for some crappy shit like AW!
>
> KAH
>
> "grimble" <grimble2000 at btinternet.com> wrote in message
> news:3c33850e at server1.Activeworlds.com...
by
> you're
> who
with
>
>
|
Jan 2, 2002, 8:27pm
Well said that man.
[View Quote]"brant" <awteen at shoemakervillage.org> wrote in message
news:3c3387c9$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> You're all forgetting on thing - and that's that if AW raised the price to
> $30 a year, 50,000 citizens wouldn't all pay for an increase. There's
> always going to be someone who says the next dollar is too much. I'd be
> willing to bet at least 10,000 citizens wouldn't renew even if the price
was
> raised to even $30. Therefore, AW wouldn't make 1.5 million dollars but
> substantially less.
>
> Second, $71K is hardly a lot of money for a huge corporation for AW to
make
> in one year. They're attempting to increase their bottom line - it's that
> simple. Chances are, they can make more money by charging that much,
> because even if they make the same amount in citizenship renewals, so many
> people will leave the universe that they'll be charged less for bandwidth,
> hosting, salaries, and so forth. There's the reasoning behind the
increase.
>
> But sheesh - why is everyone complaining about the price increase when
they
> don't even know what the increase is going to be after all? For all you
> know, you could be paying $30/year after all next year. Everyone should
> read the letter a little more carefully.
>
> "dotar sojat" <barsoom at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message
> news:3C33821D.90CC8E10 at my.activeworlds.com...
3.3
>
>
|
Jan 2, 2002, 9:24pm
Geesh ... you win the award for the most self-centred and warped outlook I
have ever come across. You would rather people lose their jobs in this
economic climate than you have to leave a chat community?
That is just sick!
[View Quote]"moff piett" <baronjutter at shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:3c339034$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
|
"You guys take pay cuts and even lay offs, and we only go up to 30-40 a
year"
Jan 2, 2002, 8:55pm
Everyone is a business expert all of a sudden, with insights into AW's
corporate business. You think these people just wake up in the middle of the
night an think "I know ... I'll screw the cits!". Man, LEARN YOUR PLACE!
[View Quote]"bowen" <bowen at omegauniverse.com> wrote in message
news:3c338c6b at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> If AWCom will look at it I can come up with something in the next couple
of
> days.. Maybe, if they'll actually listen to it too LoL.
>
> --Bowen--
>
> "cozmo" <b.nolan2 at verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:3c338bc6$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
on
> at
that
> any
> of
> against
> these
> they
> company
way
small
they
> that
is
(which
of
> AW
> might
renewed
> charge
time.
weeks,
> wouldn't
> petition....DONT
> system
> things
>
>
|
Jan 2, 2002, 9:19pm
There is no way to come up with a pricing strategy on AW's behalf without
knowing all their revenue streams and their marketing strategies ... all of
which will have been addressed and potentially restructured as part of a
stategic review of their business in a slow-down like this. Its something
facing all companies at this time and there is no "Wonder Solution" for it.
When a company has to cut costs it has no choice but to gamble with some
part of its business ... and that is the basis of the "difficult" (more like
terrifying) decisions facing AW at this time. Attempting to work out the
numbers purely on the basis of retaining citizenships is not going to
provide anything like a realistic outlook.
Invariably, companies leave it until the very last minute (often too late)
before taking corrective action and then the changes tend to be drastic for
someone. In this case ... its the cits and it sucks for us. Welcome to the
real world everyone.
Grims.
BTW ... why is MSVC++ crap?? ;o)
[View Quote]"bowen" <bowen at omegauniverse.com> wrote in message
news:3c339131$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> You need to calm down.. at least I'm trying to help instead of pulling an
> eep on everyone and going off at them. I'm a math major and an economy
> major.. you think I don't know how economy works? I may even know more
then
> Rick knows about the economy. They can find other sources of revenue then
> what they're trying to pull at this moment. I took you off my kill-file
so
> I could hear your at least logical views on it, instead of the generic
> "you're stupid, shut up." Just because AW's a corporation doesn't
> necessarily mean it's making good decisions, we're all human. There ARE
> quite a few alternatives to what they're doing.
>
> --Bowen--
>
> "grimble" <grimble2000 at btinternet.com> wrote in message
> news:3c338ff1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> the
couple
> 50,000
would
for
> know
> 650
comes
> (preferably
> more
> but
> becuase
to
way
no
seems
> before
points
> them
> more
part
(whicch
> new
> get
> to
> 3D
>
>
|
Jan 2, 2002, 9:28pm
I think it would need to come from a representative of some form of user
group if you were going to try it ... not a guy with the backing of some
other cits in the newsgroup. Is there a user group these days? It just seems
that it should come from a "body" rather than person.
I would also hope that anyone with any rational views on this doesn't go
anywhere near those dumb petitions ... kinda kills the credibility.
[View Quote]"bowen" <bowen at omegauniverse.com> wrote in message
news:3c3393bd$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I will do that if that's what you guys want. But I need consensus if I'm
> going to. And I want to hear what you guys want.
>
> --Bowen--
>
> "cozmo" <b.nolan2 at verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:3c339329 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
100
address
> Noll"
> are
> come
do
> someone
you
next
is.
that
> are
> 75%
citizens
$1,250,00.
everyone
about
and
> listened
> the
(if
there
> (only
It
reninue
Some
> see
> objects
> either
> you
will
applies
get
> two
them
> we
a
cutting
> :)
>
>
|
Jan 2, 2002, 9:29pm
I would severely question that statement, but without the figures, we'll
never know.
[View Quote]"bowen" <bowen at omegauniverse.com> wrote in message
news:3c3395f7 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> In the case of the cits.. we're the only thing that's keeping AW afloat..
> without the cits there is no AW, thus there is no company, they can't
> survive soaly on companies buying Universe/galaxies.
>
> --Bowen--
>
> "grimble" <grimble2000 at btinternet.com> wrote in message
> news:3c33957d$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
without
> of
something
> it.
> like
late)
> for
the
> an
economy
more
> then
kill-file
ARE
AW's
middle
> of
> PLACE!
are
75%
> (I
> about
> configuration
> profit
> possible
> the
> petitions
listened
the
> the
> is
(only
> a
see
objects
> need
either
you
> nto
> to
> SOME
two
we
> new
> activeworlds,
> thigns
> another
> the
:)
>
>
|
Jan 3, 2002, 10:20pm
Employees salary ceilings are guaged from the value of that individual to
the company - can't be judged from outside.
[View Quote]"bowen" <bowen at omegauniverse.com> wrote in message
news:3c34d7e4$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Their market "expert" that came up with this plan doesn't realize that a
> little over $50,000 a year is a lot of money for the head programmer in a
> small company. The other programmers are payed around $40,000.. so I'm
> told. Why wouldn't this be enough for updates.. they know what they're
> doing it's their job. They make more then enough money for this at the
> moment just from citizens of the approximate 30,000 cits that pay $20 a
year
> and for the world licenses on average of $30 per world of the 1500 non
> trial-like worlds alone to pay those costs.
>
> --Bowen--
>
> "sw chris" <chris at skywalkeronline.net> wrote in message
> news:3c34d590 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
AW
near
> trouble..
> be
could
> currently
> report
> link
> change
> the
reserves
the
> deals
> virtual
even
sure
users.
> rates,
> our
the
> end
Really.
>
>
|
Jan 9, 2002, 9:37am
If the universe is infinitely large, there there is only one and can be only
one. However, if it has dimensions, no matter how large - then there is
every possibility that there is another.
Human brains boggle at the thought of infinite size becuase we cannot
comprehend it - finite space is the only thing we can understand without
making assumptions or guesses. Our brains tell us, from experience, that
everything has its bounds, which raises too many uncomfortable questions if
that is the case with our universe - basically, what is it and where is it
situated in what environment.
The "fact" that the universe is infinitely large is, at the the of the day,
a hypothesis - a guess that makes it easier for our fragile minds to accept
its existence and not have to think about where we actually live on too
broad a scale. It could be that the universe isn't infinite in size, just
DAMNED BIG (to us al least).
An interesting alternative subject to the darned pricing structure ;o)
Grims.
[View Quote]scottydm <smiller6 at uswest.net> wrote in message
news:3C38FC70.5C14E33 at uswest.net...
> Uni = one. The only one possible. The only one that could possibly
> exist.
>
> The so-called "parallel universe" idea in science fiction is just
> another aspect of the one universe that exists. Astral, Spiritual and
> other planes of existence still exist within our one universe. Even
> Buckaroo Banzai did not leave this universe when he was traveling across
> the 8th dimension.
>
> ScottyDM
>
> aine wrote:
news:3C38DCF7.64C8D3A9 at uswest.net...
>
> --
> Send all SPAMS, FLAMES, and CONSPIRACY THEORIES to smiller6 at uswest.net
> Send all other IMPORTANT CORRESPONDENCE to scottydm at uswest.net
> ___
> /////\\ Digitally Enhanced Portrait of:
> {|-0-0-|} Scott D. Miller,
> | % | Silicon Mercenary
> \===/ Freelance Chip Designer
>
> always #5 FOO = ~FOO; // the sound of a beating heart
|
Jan 9, 2002, 10:28am
My understanding was that the general concensus was that the universe was
views as infinite and its CONTENTS were constantly expanding (until the
physics reverse the trend and we all get squished back to the singularity
from wence we came.
[View Quote]foxmccloud <FoxMcCloud at cyberbrain.com> wrote in message
news:3c3c3507$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Well it is generally considered that the universe is of finite size, and
constantly expanding.
>
> Fox Mc Cloud
>
> "grimble" <grimble2000 at btinternet.com> a écrit dans le message news:
3c3c2b91$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
only
if
it
day,
accept
just
>
>
|
Jan 6, 2002, 5:10pm
What I'd give for a £71 (GBP) a month mortgage (200 AUD)!! Not sure I could
even rent a broom cupboard for that in the UK.
[View Quote]"kah" <kah at kahnews.cjb.net> wrote in message
news:3c3882b1$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> lol, she meant *Australian* Dollars... and 2 USD is hardly even a donut
over
> here in Norway...
>
> KAH
>
the Australian dollar is worth approx 51 cents american .... $20 a week is
2/5ths of my mortgage repayment, and NOT a cup of coffee and a donut.
|
Jan 6, 2002, 11:27am
Because (hopefully) everyone has got over their impetuous "its not fair"
hysteria and is waiting to see what is going to happen. Also, I guess all
the people who felt the need to express themselves so eloquently have
already done so.
But you have to admit its funny how its not "the end of the world" anymore.
Amazing what a bit of mature reflection can bring to a situation.
Grims
[View Quote]"zero" <slavezero at dmonix.net> wrote in message
news:3c37c50e$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> What happened to it, I cant find it on there anymore. It was like #1 then
> like #5, now its gone.
>
>
> --
> Chris Waddell
> dmonix at dmonix.net
> URL: www.dmonix.net
>
>
|
Jan 6, 2002, 7:26pm
Maybe "everyone" was tpp strong a strong word. Citizens jumping ship so soon
is the epitomy of impetuous unless your cit expired very soon, but even then
its a bit enthusiastic. DLP were giving them away from what I understand.
[View Quote]"lioness o" <nobody at nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:3c38afc9 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Probably cus a lot of cits have already jumped off the sinking ship and
now
> find themselves in other unis. From what I found out last night, there
were
> over 400 new citizenships started up in Dreamland Park alone. Who knows
how
> many more in OW or Cybernet Worlds. ;-")
>
>
> "grimble" <grimble2000 at btinternet.com> wrote in message
> news:3c3850cf$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
all
> anymore.
> then
>
>
|
Jan 7, 2002, 4:58am
If you're that careless when you're told what the deal is, then you deserve
to be charged.
[View Quote]"scottydm" <smiller6 at uswest.net> wrote in message
news:3C38FD03.62E670B2 at uswest.net...
> Yep, I found it too, after a bit of digging. Let's just hope their web
> page does not go down or gets lost. But the biggest problem is the
> forgetting...
>
> brant wrote:
at
to
on
billed
that
feel
just
>
> --
> Send all SPAMS, FLAMES, and CONSPIRACY THEORIES to smiller6 at uswest.net
> Send all other IMPORTANT CORRESPONDENCE to scottydm at uswest.net
> ___
> /////\\ Digitally Enhanced Portrait of:
> {|-0-0-|} Scott D. Miller,
> | % | Silicon Mercenary
> \===/ Freelance Chip Designer
>
> always #5 FOO = ~FOO; // the sound of a beating heart
|
Jan 9, 2002, 4:30pm
"Blaxxun is worse than horseshit" ... Aye!!!
Jan 9, 2002, 8:17pm
Could be a densely populated (object-wise) area ... still plenty of work to
be dont to render the objects within the visibility radius.
[View Quote]bowen <bowen at omegauniverse.com> wrote in message
news:3c3ca2de$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Ananas said that Roland capped it at low framerate so they could do work
> with other programs and not see a degredation in computer proformance.
3.1
> was at 100.
>
> Oh blasto, if you're computer isn't rendering much or you're standing
still
> your framerates would be much higher then they would if you were in a
> crowded area with lots of people.
>
> --Bowen--
>
> "foxmccloud" <FoxMcCloud at cyberbrain.com> wrote in message
> news:3c3ca192$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> 3c3ca0fc at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> are
> moving
> Believe
> make
> be on
> makes
>
>
|
Jan 9, 2002, 10:06am
Maybe they are allowing the builders to get a look at the new objects now
while a new world is being built - no-one knows - which may be an attempt
(desitined to failure as most people here seem to be in "AW Bashing Mode"
regardless of what happens) to placate you a little in the short term.
Here is a suggestion of what (I think) will probably happen if a new, better
looking building world was introduced. I reckon AlphaWorld would end up
being dumped and everyone will get really pissed off crying over their old
builds for prosperity. AlphaWorld is a dinosaur - it has looked cheap, nasty
and uninviting for some time now - and is more than likely a huge drain on
resources to keep it going. I can see it getting dumped within 12 months if
this new building world people are talking about is opened.
Another quick thought ... There are three possibilities for these new
objects:
(a) They are introduced for use in AlphaWorld - which has been done. This is
nice and simple starting point for AW to improve its overall look.
(b) They are introduced in a new world - what people seem to want - which
means that, with such a small set of objects, everywhere will look the
same - like prefabs. There simply isn't enough range there yet to make this
viable with the current object set.
(c) AW keep them to themselves and build up the new object set without
making them available to the public. Then a new world is opened at a later
date, when the users will first see them.
My opinion is that (b) is paramount. A new world at this time with just this
small set of more attractive objects will fail because there is only a small
number of perms and coms that can be created with them.
It seems that everyone has dusted off their AW-Bashing-Sticks and is gagging
to use them as often as possible. Is no-one capable of posting something
here without the addition of a few gallons of melodrama?
If existing builds are being corrupted because of these or other changes
(this isn't just an issue with AlphaWorld, but also the private worlds that
rely on the AlphaWorld OP) then point it out to AW and ask them politely and
maturely to address the problem.
Posting an emotive messages in a newsgroup that has done all it can to
alienate AW and its staff in the past week isn't going to solve anything.
Are there any examples of what has happened? Most people won't see the
problems in AlphaWorld thanks to the crash and AW may be able to do
something about it quickly and easily if they are asked.
This is, afterall, what citizens are now being asked to pay for - support.
Grims
[View Quote]kellee <kellee at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:3c3bd380 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Yes...Alpha World now qualifies for the term- mongrel. The cruel ppl
called
> it that before, now even I, a great lover of AW ( I wouldnt build
elsewhere)
> call it the biggest mongrel out. Textures have been changed on old builds.
> Textures have been corrupted so that windows now appear where doors used
to
> be . New objects render old objects obsolete, the whole world is just a
> hodge podge of mess....
>
>
> WHY couldnt they just create a new world for the new objects as Factor
said
> they planned? I would rather see Alpha dead and buried than this
mutilation
> of its twitching corpse. It is literally a kick in the teeth for all the
> builders that spent years building in AW. *sigh* *crying for a dear,
dead
> friend*
>
>
>
>
|
Jan 9, 2002, 10:16am
"thanks to the crash" ... oops ... crash = cache
[View Quote]grimble <grimble2000 at btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:3c3c3252$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Maybe they are allowing the builders to get a look at the new objects now
> while a new world is being built - no-one knows - which may be an attempt
> (desitined to failure as most people here seem to be in "AW Bashing Mode"
> regardless of what happens) to placate you a little in the short term.
>
> Here is a suggestion of what (I think) will probably happen if a new,
better
> looking building world was introduced. I reckon AlphaWorld would end up
> being dumped and everyone will get really pissed off crying over their old
> builds for prosperity. AlphaWorld is a dinosaur - it has looked cheap,
nasty
> and uninviting for some time now - and is more than likely a huge drain on
> resources to keep it going. I can see it getting dumped within 12 months
if
> this new building world people are talking about is opened.
>
> Another quick thought ... There are three possibilities for these new
> objects:
>
> (a) They are introduced for use in AlphaWorld - which has been done. This
is
> nice and simple starting point for AW to improve its overall look.
>
> (b) They are introduced in a new world - what people seem to want - which
> means that, with such a small set of objects, everywhere will look the
> same - like prefabs. There simply isn't enough range there yet to make
this
> viable with the current object set.
>
> (c) AW keep them to themselves and build up the new object set without
> making them available to the public. Then a new world is opened at a later
> date, when the users will first see them.
>
> My opinion is that (b) is paramount. A new world at this time with just
this
> small set of more attractive objects will fail because there is only a
small
> number of perms and coms that can be created with them.
>
> It seems that everyone has dusted off their AW-Bashing-Sticks and is
gagging
> to use them as often as possible. Is no-one capable of posting something
> here without the addition of a few gallons of melodrama?
>
> If existing builds are being corrupted because of these or other changes
> (this isn't just an issue with AlphaWorld, but also the private worlds
that
> rely on the AlphaWorld OP) then point it out to AW and ask them politely
and
> maturely to address the problem.
>
> Posting an emotive messages in a newsgroup that has done all it can to
> alienate AW and its staff in the past week isn't going to solve anything.
>
> Are there any examples of what has happened? Most people won't see the
> problems in AlphaWorld thanks to the crash and AW may be able to do
> something about it quickly and easily if they are asked.
>
> This is, afterall, what citizens are now being asked to pay for - support.
>
> Grims
>
>
> kellee <kellee at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message
> news:3c3bd380 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> called
> elsewhere)
builds.
> to
> said
> mutilation
> dead
>
>
|
Jan 13, 2002, 4:42pm
The way I read that was that they were basically making a reference to the
new pricing ... i.e. once your citizenship reaches its renewal date,
renewals be made on the basis of whatever the "existing citzen's" pricing is
decided upon.
Grims
[View Quote]anduin lothario <anduin at NOSPAM.anduin-lothario.com> wrote in message
news:3c40b106 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Did you not read the F.A.Q? In Feb 2003 they are already going to be
> charging us $10 per month, they accidentally spilt that information I'm
> guessing.
>
> That's why you renew your cit NOW, before the end of January so you don't
> have to pay the $10 per month until next year.
> This month is the last month they are allowing us to renew for $20 per
year.
>
> --
> _________________________________________
> Anduin Lothario
> ICQ#:17962714
>
> SMS: (Send an SMS message to my ICQ): +278314217962714
> More ways to contact me:
> http://wwp.icq.com/17962714
> http://www.anduin-lothario.com
> _________________________________________
> "swe" <m_swehli at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:3c3ed795 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
new
pay
have
clouds.
old
i
jsut
> either
> I'm
> news:
the
And
> it
u
> lay
> the
>
>
|
Jan 14, 2002, 10:27pm
Hey everyone ... lets all welcome AW's new 3D Homepage Marketing Manager!
[View Quote]pc hamster <pchamster at msn.com> wrote in message
news:3c436db6$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Hi everyone:
>
>
> "data21" <dbmiller at kiski.net> wrote in message
> news:3c3df4e6 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
the
>
> I *really* hate to sound like the proverbial devil here, but you got
EXACTLY
> what you paid for!!! Based on what you've said so far, you sent in NO $$$
> so *technically speaking* YOU HAD NO CITIZENSHIP!!!!
>
> Now, I *will* agree that you should get the land owed to you (although
even
> THAT would be rather generous of AW to do), however if *I* were you, I
> wouldn't exactly hold your breath. :-)
>
> Besides, with a PROPERLY PAID FOR 3D Homepage, you could probably get the
> same amount of land back (and then some!) - AND YOU WOULD LEGALLY OWN IT
ALL
> BY YOURSELF!!!
>
> Now, with that said, I'm not going to add salt to the proverbial wound by
> rubbing it in. But it is EXACTLY because of cases like this that AW (or
any
> other "Dot Com" for that matter!) don't encourage the transferring of ANY
> account for ANY reason. It's just that simple.
>
> In all sincerity, I do wish you well with your new citizenship, but I also
> hope you've learned a lesson or two stemming from your "old" one.
>
> Just my $.02 worth...
>
> Cheers for now everyone :-)
>
> Patrick Cook
> Owner - Pub 102X
> pchamster at msn.com
> musicradio102x at juno.com
> Denver, Colorado
>
>
|
Jan 15, 2002, 12:34pm
'Twas just an honest jest ;o) ... 3d Homepages have sadly been given very
little respect in the newsgroups especially after recent events. I thought
it was funny to see such an staunch advocate stick his head into the
proverbial lion's den.
Personally, I'm glad you get so much enjoyment from your 3D Homepage - its
not often we get such an enthusiastic and POSITIVE post in here.
Good luck,
Grims.
[View Quote]pc hamster <pchamster at msn.com> wrote in message
news:3c43e2b7$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> And Grimble....What was that GRUMBLING noise I heard about ME being AW's
> "New 3D Homepage Marketing Manager" I heard???? *grin!* Boy, I wish I
> *did* have that position.... :-)
|
Jan 15, 2002, 1:01pm
Oh wow ... I bet they're really pissed about that! LOL
Grims
[View Quote]data21 <dbmiller at kiski.net> wrote in message
news:3c443e2c at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Because "if" it was under a world back then even thoue AW told me that is
> was "not" under any worlds back then, well since I was not able to pay for
> it soposibly being renewed free under a world, AW just lost $40 bucks.
>
>
> "wizard myrddin" <Wiz at rdescape.com> wrote in message
> news:3c43f944 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
world
find
> money
> did
> pay
> got
> in
> you,
probably
LEGALLY
that
> AW
transferring
> but
one.
>
>
|
Jan 15, 2002, 1:40pm
No free cit anymore ... but still good value with the hosting provided
methinks.
Grims
[View Quote]wizard myrddin <Wiz at rdescape.com> wrote in message
news:3c444aa6 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Rofl
> At last some Humour in the NG, after the unfound doom and gloom out there,
> Win a bingo world is the calling no reg fee and only $10 for a p10/5 Now
> thats what I call good value, and a free cit..
>
> Hint aw we need more bingo
>
> Wiz the Bingo Addict
> "grimble" <grimble2000 at btinternet.com> wrote in message
> news:3c443de6$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> very
thought
its
AW's
I
>
>
|
Jan 15, 2002, 10:02pm
Nothing stopping him taking them elsewhere ... A very simple solution is
HamFon's Buildbot ... it doesn't give a monkey's navel about the citizen
number its built on ... in fact he can filter the scan using it!
Not sure how else he was intending to "take it with him" anyway.
Grims
[View Quote]lioness o <nobody at nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:3c44a6b7 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> From what I remember reading, Data CAN'T take his creations with him since
> they now have Loki's name stamped all over them. That is in part, some of
> what Data's complaint is. Data was, for over 2 years, one of the major
> builders in DLP, building not just in some of the worlds there but helping
> to create most of the landscape. He was a pivotal creator of most of what
> you see in DLP today. With Loki's name stamped on most of those builds,
Data
> cannot do anything with those objects. He cannot move them, nor change
them
> in any way, (ie delete them).
>
>
> "pc hamster" <pchamster at msn.com> wrote in message
> news:3c437015$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
do
registered
lot
> out.
> Then
Homepage
(sorry,
>
>
|
Jan 16, 2002, 1:05pm
YOU don't need to. Do you have no friends in AW? Either someone that trusts
you enough to lend you a *temporary* priv password or will work with you for
a little while to scan your stuff of for you??
Are you determined to make this a bigger issue that it already appears to be
for you?
Grims
[View Quote]data21 <dbmiller at kiski.net> wrote in message
news:3c4590b3 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I can't log a bot in without a cit.
>
>
> "grimble" <grimble2000 at btinternet.com> wrote in message
> news:3c44c309$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> since
> of
> helping
> what
builds,
can't
a
> things
cit.
> had
things
> Why
AGAIN???
>
>
|
Jan 17, 2002, 12:55am
That's your opinion ... I've been reading this thread in case something
useful/interesting pops in and I'm not getting into who's at fault or
whether you have any right to the cit - I don't care.
I pointed out a simple way to move your stuff if you want to and off you go
in search of other obstacles to stop you ending this. Sort it out or forget
it already!
Get someone to scan it for you ... then take it to DLP and rebuild it in a
nice little spot of your own. Its not difficult! Once that's done, there's
no need to prolong this thread any longer since its between you and whoever
you have the gripe with.
Grims
[View Quote]data21 <dbmiller at kiski.net> wrote in message
news:3c461823 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Ummm I did not make/start this issue the person that took my cit did!
> My posting is the "effect" of a problem not the cause of one....
>
>
> "grimble" <grimble2000 at btinternet.com> wrote in message
> news:3c4596b2$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> trusts
> for
to
> be
solution
> is
> citizen
him
> some
> major
of
> change
> looks
a
> you
(allegedly!).
him/herself
>
>
|
|