|
sw comit // User Search
sw comit // User Search
Jul 16, 2006, 5:24am
That's not a bug, that's intentional! ;D
Actually I kinda assumed it was, but haven't had a crash problem yet.
[View Quote]"Strike Rapier" <markyr at gmail.com> wrote in message
news:44b9c137 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> (Confirmed by several people)
>
> When finding an object error (obj does not exist, encroachment etc) the
> browser stalls - the entire area seemingly reloaded in its entirety. With
> several objects coming back as errors its enough to crash the browser.
>
> --
> - Mark Randall
> http://www.temporal-solutions.co.uk
>
> "We're Systems and Networks..."
> "It's our job to know..."
>
|
Jul 17, 2006, 2:26pm
Well I dunno if it would cause crashing, but this is a very dirty object.
That is, how efficient it was scripted. I ran it through a cleaner -
accutrans, and slimmed it down from 454k characters to 10k characters, a 91%
shrink. Check your tgrams in AW ;)
- Com
[View Quote]"Rizla" <Rizla at witchlock.plus.com> wrote in message
news:44bb8c72$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> This is weird.. i got a free object from a website..
> everytime i use the object.. a shell to a house.. the browser just
> closes..
> re-installed the browser and still same thing..
> any ideas?
> i have uploaded the object to
> http://www.airtsandcrafts.co.uk/aw/sc-cot3-shell.zip
> could be a bug in the browser or object.. but surely you should get an
> error message and not a termination... ;)
>
|
Jul 19, 2006, 3:15am
Just a follow-up, he said it worked :D
- Com
[View Quote]"stacee" <stacey at activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:44bbe52e$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>I learned something today then. Thank you :)
>
> I'd be curious to know if the cleanup by Comit makes it so the object
> works now.
>
> ~Stacey
|
Jul 21, 2006, 3:07pm
Yea I get that too. Both in Alphaworld and other worlds and even other
universes like Stagecoach.
[View Quote]"Justin Eyres" <justin_ey_1 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:44c0dda3 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Anyone else having this problem where their avatars are blocks? <img
> src="www.vmist.net/bawtv/Blocks.jpg"/>
>
>
|
Jul 22, 2006, 12:26am
Haven't heard anybody having z buffering problems to that degree...5 shift
clicks? wow O_O
It is a graphic card issue, dealing with the z buffer precision (either 24
or 32 bit I think); but it shouldn't be THAT bad.
- Com
[View Quote]"Kenneth" <cosmosken at sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:44c17aa0$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
|
> -Old Z Buffer problem. It takes around 5 small clicks away from a closer
> object to not bleed through the closer object. I know this depends on
> graphics cards, but it would be nice if they fixed it for all modern
> graphics cards.
>
> Computer: Dell 2 Ghz 64 MB Video 512 MB RAM 3 mb/sec DSL
>
> -Kenneth
Jul 27, 2006, 10:48pm
I'm not part of it but I think I can say it was formed out of those who had
the initiative to do so. They appointed themselves and started from scratch,
in other words. AWReunion is an organization, and was first started like any
other ;)
- Com
[View Quote]"Tart Sugar" <tartsugar at comcast.net> wrote in message
news:44c94f02 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Just out of curiosity, who makes up this committee and how did they come
> to be appointed to this committee?
|
Jul 30, 2006, 5:26pm
Well actually they do have the whole AWReunion world going for them, which I
believe is donated by AWI. Dunno if you wanna call that sponsoring or not
though ;)
- Com
[View Quote]"Ciena" <nikona at comcast.net> wrote in message
news:44cca7a4$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> and just how did they sponser it? just being on the comittee doesnt mean
> awi sponsers it. they r ppl just like us but happen to have a job working
> for awi. awi did not sponser it. and just because theres a picture at gz
> doesnt mean awi sponsers it. all ya gotta do is ask awi if they will put a
> sign at gz and they will. no big deal there to do that.
|
Jul 27, 2006, 2:24pm
More like biting the hand that gives you a small snack - AW Universe is only
a small side-income for their business. They don't have the incentive to
deal with customers giving them grief.
- Com
[View Quote]"Lady Tigrane" <lady_tigrane at yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:44c8e6c5$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Definitely odd considering they probably need all the members they can
> get. Biting the hand that feeds you is not a good idea.
|
Jul 27, 2006, 3:37pm
"Complaints"? What sorta complaints? There's many ways to complain. Some
fall into the realm of whining and outright insulting, and some as
attempting to form a cyber-riot over something. If you complain, plz be
civil and constructive about it.
[View Quote]"Lady Tigrane" <lady_tigrane at yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:44c8eea8$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Some folk aren't really giving them grief. Some were banned simply for
> putting in a complaint.
> If you were to purchase a hardware component for say a computer.. or even
> a toaster that was malfunctioning wouldn't you expect a lil customer
> service, rather than the blatant slap in the face many folks recieved?
|
Jul 27, 2006, 4:08pm
I was referring to the people you were talking about, not this thread ;)
[View Quote]"Lady Tigrane" <lady_tigrane at yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:44c8fb45$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> hmm.. I was under the impression I was being civil.. How was this thread
> whiny or insulting? I believe making a valid point on a recent series of
> occurances is being constructive, and I honestly feel my wording and
> phrasing has been civil. How is starting a thread over people being
> unfairly
> banned with no explanation "starting a riot"? Isn't making folks aware of
> an undesirable situation is the first step in correcting it?
|
Jul 27, 2006, 5:12pm
Best solution would be for them to confront AWI with over the phone - (978)
499-0222
- Com
[View Quote]"Lady Tigrane" <lady_tigrane at yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:44c903e6 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>I know of 3 peeps that got banned.. one of them was a kind girl that never
>bothered anybody. Another individual simply tried to get answers to a
>technical question. How is that inciting anything other than getting a
>simple answer about the issue they were attempting to deal with?
>
> I finally found the TOS, by trying to start a re install of AW.. It may
> say "they do not guarantee any access or upgrades, but this hardly
> justifies being kicked off of AW entirely for making an inquiry about it.
|
|