|
|
goober king // User Search
goober king // User Search
Mar 1, 2003, 2:21am
Might help if you actually told us what you were talking about... ;P
[View Quote]jstone2004 wrote:
> Anyone any good with php? I recently installed a php thing on my website,
> and it was all the files that the website installed, but it's comming up
> with a ton of disruptive little things saying something about errors, anyone
> know what I'm talking about, or want to help?
>
> J
>
>
|
--
Goober King
"My thing won't work!! FIX IT!!" :P
gooberking at utn.cjb.net
Mar 2, 2003, 1:23am
Here's one way to solve the problem: Get PostNuke instead! ;P
[View Quote]jstone2004 wrote:
> all that, and I forgot to mention that it is PHP Nuke :-)
>
> J
>
> "jstone2004" <j at jlife.net> wrote in message
> news:3e602ea9$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
> anyone
>
>
>
>
|
--
Goober King
PostNuke is to PC as PHPNuke is to Mac...
gooberking at utn.cjb.net
Mar 3, 2003, 6:33pm
Netscape 7. Not only do you get a working email client, but you also get
a better web browser. ;D
[View Quote]kah wrote:
> "kah" <kah at kahnews.cjb.net> wrote in
> news:Xns9333BC5C5D4D5kahatkahnewsdotcjbdo at 64.94.241.201:
>
> Forgot to mention, it'll need to support POP3 (some only support IMAP) as
> that's what my mail scanner scans.
>
> KAH
|
--
Goober King
Converting the Horde, one M$ toadie at a time
gooberking at utn.cjb.net
Mar 4, 2003, 3:14pm
Glad to know I have an ally against the ignorant masses! ;D
[View Quote]kah wrote:
> "maki" <maki at awmaki.com> wrote in
> news:3e63ff41$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com:
>
>
>
>
> No, it's not a compatibility issue. NS7 supports HTML 4.01 and XHTML
> perfectly. That it doesn't happen to support MS's own mutant HTML version
> is just as well in my view. IE loads fine for me too, but I still use NS7
> because I feel like using quality software and not some insecure piece of
> junk.
>
> If they block users running non-IE browsers they're very stupid. If a site
> doesn't work right for me in NS, I just won't visit it, too bad for the
> site owner. Especially if it's a commercial site that'll want to sell me
> something.
>
> PS: Goober, what browser do you think I've used the last five years? :-D
>
> KAH
|
--
Goober King
Massively ignorant
gooberking at utn.cjb.net
Mar 4, 2003, 7:28pm
Actually, it sounds to me like you're still using the old Netscape (they
don't call it "Communicator" anymore). I would suggest you upgrade to NS
7, as it's far superior than any of its predecessors. :)
[View Quote]kit wrote:
> Hiya :o)
>
> Another ally here too Goober. Ive been using Netscape and its products since
> about 1995. Netscape Communicator is offered for 17 platforms, including Windows
> 95, Windows 3.1, Windows NT, Mac OS, OS/2, and a variety of Unix platforms. The
> product is available in Standard and Professional Editions and more than ten
> languages. In addition, Netscape software supports Internet standards
> (including Java, JavaScript, HTML, HTTP, IIOP, IMAP4, LDAP, NNTP, POP3, and
> SMTP) and security standards such as SSL (no virus's here :o)). It seems to have
> a few problems with ASP at the moment but I can easily deal with that.
> I wouldn't have my mail or news reader in any other format.
>
> Regards,
> Kit
>
> goober king wrote:
>
>
|
--
Goober King
The resistance is growing...
gooberking at utn.cjb.net
Mar 4, 2003, 7:29pm
It does if you take it in the literal sense, hence "literal opposite".
Netscape does actually "own" Mozilla, since that's where Mozilla gets
its funding from.
[View Quote]bowen wrote:
> "agent1" <agent1 at shatteredplatters.com.nospam> wrote in message
> news:3e64f24b$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
> they use the results in their browser. Mozilla is a "testing only" thing where
> Netscape is meant for end users.
>
> That doesn't really mean anything, since the fact that this is opinion based what I
> say has no "literal opposite" unless I had an anti-Bowen.
>
> --Bowen--
>
>
|
--
Goober King
Reading Comprehension strikes again!
gooberking at utn.cjb.net
Mar 7, 2003, 2:53pm
I've tried to stay out of this as best I can, since all this arguing
solves nothing (everyone's pretty much made up their mind one way or the
other), but I would just like to point out the following:
The train of thought in the Bush Administration has been, if Saddam
fully disarms (i.e. gets rid of *all* his WMDs, not just a couple
missiles), then we won't have to go to war. But, if he doesn't disarm
and we do go to war, then we'll be doing more than just trying to get
him to disarm; we'll also be trying to enact that "regime change"
everyone's been yakking about, because if Saddam won't follow the UN's
resolutions, even with the threat of war, then Bush believes he has to
be taken out of action, permanently.
[View Quote]the joker ss wrote:
> now you say if saddam goes there is no war , i thought this was about the
> weapons he doesnt have ?
>
>
|
--
Goober King
Permanent solution to a temporary problem
gooberking at utn.cjb.net
Mar 11, 2003, 10:21am
Perhaps if you didn't type like a 12 yr old and actually took the time
to construct your thoughts in an intelligible way, you wouldn't be
considered a "young'un". :P
[View Quote]the joker ss wrote:
> 22 in may , and oyu know very well i am talking bullshit here , i am not so
> much defending my opinion , or not even trying to change your opinion or
> bowens , there are a lot of ppl who dont know a lot about the whole
> background of this , and i want them to know the facts , not the truth in
> some one others eyes
>
>
|
--
Goober King
Typing his age, not his shoe size
gooberking at utn.cjb.net
Mar 12, 2003, 10:38pm
Now you know why *I* didn't bother getting involved in this "debate". :P
[View Quote]sw chris wrote:
> Opinion, opinion, opinion. :)
>
> Ananas, the only reason you think that is because you don't have 3000 dead
> in your country in one day. That kind of thing is going to make the beehive
> buzz.
>
> And furthermore, I believe I can now make the general observation that most
> people who oppose the war are those folks who haven't seen a day of
> oppression in their lives (which just happen to be white people). Whereas
> folks like Jewish holocaust survivors such as Elie Weisel, scores of Iraqi
> ex-patriots, American indians, and white kids like me who've been picked on
> in school but are stronger for that experience know that injustice to any
> civilization is not something one lays down and takes over and over and over
> again.
>
> Oh oh. You're going to try to get me on the question of "What is justice?"
> right? Well, you can debate generalities all you want, but that's not going
> to stop the fact that Saddam's going down, regardless of lucrative European
> and Russian oil contracts and continuous promises of placation under the
> stupid Inspection program that doesn't even have enough manpower to cover a
> country the size of Iraq and only works if there is a sizable military force
> threatening to invade. At least that's according to one of the senior
> inspectors in Baghdad and the UN Security Council, respectively.
>
> Most people can reconsile their disagreements, but I guess we just have to
> resort to namecalling instead. It just means you've ran out of things to
> argue about. So I'm butting out of this for the duration of the war. I
> think you'll be hard pressed to find anyone to debate you any further,
> especially with two anarchists who are so far out there in their views that
> I don't even know if they're on the right or left! Ananas seems to be the
> only clear-thinking one out there.
>
> Thanks guys for the rousing debate. I'll try to be tactful from here on
> out. I don't intend to insult anyone. Ananas I respect your opinions but I
> think you're dead wrong. Others have brought new insight to me into the
> European attitude concerning war. So I guess I did learn something and now
> I have more firepower for the next round. :D I'll see you after V-Day.
>
> And thus, I say this with the most obvious sarcasm I can muster. Instead of
> fighting each other, let's turn our attention to a common enemy. France!
> Chirac, go surrender to somebody and butt out. :P
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
> "ananas" <vha at oct31.de> wrote in message news:3E6F7A56.5A8E3FAC at oct31.de...
>
> news:3E6F735B.DDEE27F4 at oct31.de...
>
> spewed from
>
>
>
|
--
Goober King
Doesn't go into a battle of wits with unarmed people
gooberking at utn.cjb.net
Mar 14, 2003, 2:06am
Might as well ask why dogs bark or why eating ice cream too fast makes
your head hurt. God (or in this case, Protagonist) just made it that way.
Note: If TechnoZeus actually tries to explain why dogs bark or ice cream
hurts, I will smack him into next week. :P
[View Quote]the lady wrote:
> Curious about this:
>
> sound:forest1.wav
>
> can be used in a command line and work but if you try to use this for
> example:
>
> picture:objects.activeworlds.com/aw/textures/pict.jpg
> or
> sign:"test"
>
> it will not work. Why? If it worked, it would cut out some extra cell data
> usage.
>
> Also, what is the difference between the on, yes and off, no command? Do
> both sets have exactly the same values 100 percent of the time? If so, why
> were they created because on and no are shorter and use less space. Why the
> need for two sets?
>
>
|
--
Goober King
Because God just made him that way
gooberking at utn.cjb.net
Mar 21, 2003, 10:58pm
It's especially bad because it only works in IE. :P
[View Quote]r i c h a r d wrote:
> http://homepage.ntlworld.com/robbiekhan/cupholder.htm
>
>
|
--
Goober King
Netscape: Protection from IE Stupidity
gooberking at utn.cjb.net
Mar 27, 2003, 7:18pm
Just a reminder that the end of March is fast approaching and the
AlphaWorld Features Poll over at AWNews is still going. If you haven't
voted yet, head over to http://www.awnews.org and cast your vote!
Remember, at the end of the month, we'll be sending the complete results
to AWI, so make your voice heard! And don't forget to tell your friends!
NOTE: In order to vote in AWNews polls, you must become a registered
member. To register, go to
http://awnews.org/html/user.php?op=register&module=NS-NewUser.
Registration is quick and painless, and we promise we won't share your
information with any lame spam lists. :)
--
Goober King
AWNews Editor in Chief
awnews at awnews.org
Apr 1, 2003, 2:49pm
"Still, 'most of these companies have failed to come up with viable
business models,' Noll says."
How prophetic. Guess we can add AWI to that list. :P
[View Quote]mrbruce wrote:
> Check this old review out I found from CNN
> http://www.cnn.com/2000/TECH/computing/09/12/3d.homesteads.idg/
>
>
|
--
Goober King
Virtual Nostradamus
gooberking at utn.cjb.net
Apr 8, 2003, 10:23am
Why do you think I wrote it? :P
[View Quote]bowen wrote:
> "brock" <Brock at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message
> news:3e923c92 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
>
> Again, can anyone see Brock trying to live up to the AWNG guide's quote of him?
> StrikeR. and I can't be the only two.
>
> --Bowen--
>
>
|
--
Goober King
Putting it mildly
gooberking at utn.cjb.net
Apr 8, 2003, 8:13pm
No, Brock has always been a loudmouth moron. Where do you think I got
the idea from in the first place? :P
[View Quote]bowen wrote:
> "goober king" <gooberking at utn.cjb.net> wrote in message
> news:3E92B088.6080702 at utn.cjb.net...
>
>
>
> Yeah but he _isn't_ that way, or wasn't before. He's only trying to be that way
> because you wrote it.
>
> --Bowen--
>
>
|
--
Goober King
From one loudmouth moron to another
gooberking at utn.cjb.net
Apr 17, 2003, 9:41pm
It's because they increased the far clipping plane limit to 1200. By
increasing the distance you can see terrain, you have to sacrifice
something, and in this case, it was z-buffering. :-/
[View Quote]sw chris wrote:
> I have also noticed the amount of z buffering depends on what kind of video
> card you have. There's not really much you can do although why the amount
> of z buffering would change from one version to the next while still using
> the same video card is quite beyond my faculties to compute.
>
> =|:-)
>
> Chris
>
> "chiana" <stonkingv8 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:3e9e8b41 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
|
--
Goober King
Clipping the plane of sanity
gooberking at utn.cjb.net
Apr 17, 2003, 6:19pm
Or, you could make a web page that displays all the images you use in
your area and have people visit that webpage in their internal window
beforehand...
[View Quote]ananas wrote:
> What you can do is use a filter proxy to remove
> the HTTP referer. WebWasher isn't freeware anymore
> but there are other similar products.
>
>
>
>
> bro wrote:
>
>
|
--
Goober King
The simple approach
gooberking at utn.cjb.net
Apr 21, 2003, 3:44pm
I think he was trying to be funny, Bowen... :P
[View Quote]bowen wrote:
> "john" <john at 3d-reality.com> wrote in message
> news:3ea3dc99 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
>
> Uh, it does not say no culinary debates. I wasn't specifically implying any one
> religion either. I think chicken is acceptable to most anyways.
>
> --Bowen--
>
>
|
--
Goober King
Thinking Bowen's Sarcasm Detector is defective...
gooberking at utn.cjb.net
Apr 22, 2003, 4:20pm
Fox, if the GKs aren't smart enough to tell how a word is being used in
the context of a conversation, then maybe they shouldn't be GKs in the
first place.
"Those shitake mushrooms were delicious!"
vs.
"Those mushrooms tasted like... shitake! ;)"
You figure it out. :P
P.S. It's intentionally misspelled to prove a point. :P
[View Quote]agent fox mulder wrote:
> well shittake mushrooms can easily be mistaken for the other word,lots of
> people use it to disguise the real word and hide it in other forms....And
> for saying breats,the gks have to eject you for those things its the
> rules,especially if he asked you to stop....and saying shut up over and over
> again isn't nice and it ruins the atmosphere,so i think the gks had all the
> rights to,(of course KEBO was probably having a bad day to),its there job to
> eject people for that,its not all there choice.....
>
> -AFM
> "bowen" <thisguyrules at 7k2.4mg.com.ANTISPAM> wrote in message
> news:3ea23660 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
> that's
>
>
> Yaaaaaaaaaa
>
>
> :LEAP....
>
>
> well. I'll
>
>
> other people
>
>
>
>
|
--
Goober King
This GK underwent intelligence training
gooberking at utn.cjb.net
Apr 22, 2003, 7:30pm
For COB's sake, Bowen, don't encourage him! The last thing we need in
here is yet *another* derailed war thread. It's obvious Drac has trouble
letting go of his "issues" with the war, so let's just let him wallow in
his own perceived notions of the real world and you go about your
business, ok?
[View Quote]bowen wrote:
> "count dracula" <dracula at netsonic.fi> wrote in message
> news:3ea59905$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
>
> No direct words, implications of certain countries and people though.
>
> --Bowen--
>
>
|
--
Goober King
Deja vu, all over again
gooberking at utn.cjb.net
Apr 23, 2003, 7:53pm
*smacks Rossy* What did I tell Bowen *not* to do? :P
[View Quote]rossyboy wrote:
>
> for his ejection.
>
>
> I can't ever remember an ejection I was thankful for.
>
>
>
>
> Bowen knows other than G-rated language and therefore is a threat to a G-
> rated enviroment.
>
> Everyone is a threat to the G-rated environment. Even if someone didn't
> know any bad language they could still steer the topic away from G rated.
> The point here is that I think it was obvious that all Bowen was doing
> was stating that "breast" does not have to be a sexual word.
>
> As far as ejections at the gate are concerned, I think pre-emptive
> strikes are a bad move. There is only one way to be sure if a
> conversation is going to turn nasty, and that is to wait until the nasty
> bit happens. If someone ejects just because the conversation COULD turn
> nasty you might end up with one very angry inncoent ejectee.
>
> Some might say it's better to be safe than sorry - but it seems to me
> like pre-emptive strikes make the gate look like CENSORSHIP CITY. If GKs
> are going to start getting rid of people because they have the potential
> to cause trouble, you might just shut down AW now because AWI sure isn't
> going to get any new citizens!
|
--
Goober King
Back-handed sanity enforcer
gooberking at utn.cjb.net
Apr 24, 2003, 2:17pm
BTW, it should be noted that the GK website is grossly outdated (one of
the ETLs has passed away and the other is now a "regular" GK). Perhaps
if that was a bit more up-to-date, people would be able to get in touch
with the ETLs a little easier, as emailing may be too slow for a given
situation.
[View Quote]truetome2 wrote:
> I'm back, and I think everyone has things to say that really seemed to be
> bothering them, but I don't feel that what you are complaining about is
> being represented in the right way. Ok points that have been made:
>
> 1.) Some GK's eject for reasons that they should not.
> 2.) Some GK's Don't eject when they should.
> 3.) Some GK's seem to act as though they are superiour to others.
> 4.) Some GK's do not appear to know what is G rated and what is not G rated.
>
> Does that seem like a fair assestment of the problems?
>
> Ok well then let's start there, first off as I mentioned in my last post
> the only way to help find these troubled GK's is to let the ETL's know that
> there is a problem. Second I must say again that as with any large group
> specially a volunteer group it is hard to choose someone who will as we in
> the GK's say "Smile from the wrist down" always! Everyone that has ever
> applied for GK's has said "oh I can handle the pressure and I will smile and
> not go nuts" but then you have these instances like what has been posted
> here. Sometimes, a problem you witness may be from a new GK who is working
> on their own but really is still learning....example->Lady Barbara she is
> a newer GK and when you are new you try to do your very best to uphold the
> rules, granted I agree that "Crap" does not warrant warning or ejection in
> the case I read but in other times I have had to myself warn or eject for
> the same word, but for different reasons... Tourist said "GK I'm going to
> beat the crap out of you" well that is harassment and so out he might
> go...Notice I said "might" in my case I usually say ok whatever and try to
> go on but we do tend to have a lot of young people who think it is more fun
> to try and get ejected than to chat with others.
>
> As for joining the PK's & GK's together, well that is not going to
> happen. We do two completely different jobs for AWI and we work together in
> that fashion but not as one group. If someone has called the PK's to the
> gate for help, again it is because they are not trained completely. We do
> not call PKs for GK business, that is not standard practice. I am sure that
> the PK's and the WK's all have their own internal problems and they all know
> that training is the key to success. As a Team Leader I am constantly
> training my team to be better GK's, and I am very proud of the group I have
> to work with. They are super GK's and you've not complained about one of
> them but... we are all one big team and it saddens me to see so many upset
> with the GK organization as a whole because of a few GK's.
>
> You are right this is a NG and it is here for discussion, so I guess I
> am glad that the problems are being brought to light because I assure they
> are being looked into.
>
> May I ask one thing?
> Please don't condemn all Gatekeepers for the actions of a few, and if you
> have a complaint turn it in and we will take care of it. Gate is suppose to
> be a place for newcomers to learn, it is G rated and yes that is a very thin
> line, one that sometimes is in question with more than just the GK, but we
> have a job to do and even if we think "hey that was not to bad", sometimes
> we have others complaining in whispers or grams to do something about so and
> so. My favorite answer is "MUTE" but sometimes that doesn't always work.
>
> Just as Leo said:
>
> Your generalizing GK's are not ALWAYS bad judges. Yes there are some
> that have no right to judge anyone and others are quite professional in what
> they do and offer. It's just like society.....we got a little of
> everything...:)
>
> as I see it the main problem is the majority of the people visiting the gate
> are in the "young crowd" category...and most of them do not like to be
> disciplined.....they are not into the "authority figures" and that is what a
> GK is....and they have to remember that the only tool a GK has to discipline
> in the Gate is to send that person to their room(eject) not really that
> harmful if you ask me...maybe a shot to their ego's....but no harm no
> foul...:)
>
> Leo :)
> ____________________________________________________________________________
> ___________________
>
> So please when your in gate, remember the old saying "if you want respect,
> you have got to give respect" and if you find that you are not getting the
> respect you deserve or are wrongly ejected turn it in. Oh and anyone who
> likes may add my name to their contact list and gram me if you like, I am
> not the one who makes decisions but I can help you get the response your
> looking for.
>
>
|
--
Goober King
Keeping with the times
gooberking at utn.cjb.net
Apr 27, 2003, 2:53pm
Must be nice to be young and know everything.
Last I checked, participation does not equal maturity. And I don't know
where you got that statistic from, but it's about as far from the truth
as you can get. Older people, by definition, are far more mature than
younger folk simply because they've been around longer and have seen and
learned more than them. Granted, there are some rather immature adults,
but they are far outnumbered by "idiot kids". Just listen in on an
AWTeen GZ discussion or watch A!!CT politics and you'll see what I mean. :P
[View Quote]bowen wrote:
> What's your proof KAH isn't older? Just because people are older does not mean they
> have any more sophistication... in fact the chances of someone younger being more
> mature than someone older is pretty high. Compare AWTeen to A!CT or whatever it's
> called, or let's compare AWTeen to any world at this moment; AWTeen has the most
> citizen participation of any world I've seen so far.
|
--
Goober King
Old fart
gooberking at utn.cjb.net
Apr 27, 2003, 3:49pm
*smacks forehead* That is the absolute worst comparison to use. For one
thing, juveniles only wind up in prison for very serious offenses,
otherwise, the assumption is "they just didn't know any better" and
they're sent to counseling or a halfway house. However, by the time you
become an adult, you *should* know better, so you get sent to prison for
breaking laws that you know damn well you're not supposed to be breaking.
Besides, maturity and the law have almost nothing to do with each other.
You can be considered mature and still break the law (for instance, I
doubt the CEO of Enron was into fart jokes and calling people
"poopy-heads." :P).
[View Quote]bowen wrote:
> "goober king" <gooberking at utn.cjb.net> wrote in message
> news:3EAC0AB7.2090606 at utn.cjb.net...
>
>
>
> OK, compare the number who've been in prison to the number of kids who've been in
> juvie or prison. Tell me which is higher; it may not be a good statistic to use, but
> it's one of the better ones.
>
> --Bowen--
>
>
|
--
Goober King
Poopy-head
gooberking at utn.cjb.net
Apr 27, 2003, 10:08pm
Umm, no. I never said that younger people were not capable of being
mature. Just as there are some immature adults, there are also some
children mature beyond their years. While I agree that age and maturity
don't always go hand-in-hand, what I'm disagreeing with is your
statement that there's a greater chance of a younger person being more
mature than an older person, which is simply impossible. Since the only
way a child would become mature is if he/she grew up in a mature
environment (mature parents, friends, teachers, etc.), that child would
already be outnumbered by mature adults, thereby proving your statement
false. :P
And since when was Texas lenient on juveniles? :P
[View Quote]bowen wrote:
> "goober king" <gooberking at utn.cjb.net> wrote in message
> news:3EAC17B8.1030504 at utn.cjb.net...
>
>
>
> You must live in texas or something. Kids end up in Juvie here for spray painting
> walls.
>
>
>
>
> The law defines maturity, if it doesn't, you just agreed to my earlier post. (meaning
> age doesn't define the level of maturity -- especially since law gives ages to
> everything; sex, alcohol, et al.)
>
> --Bowen--
>
>
|
--
Goober King
Mature beyond your years
gooberking at utn.cjb.net
Apr 28, 2003, 2:24pm
And this, class, is the perfect example of being older, but not
necessarily more mature. :P
[View Quote]binarybud wrote:
> and i ain't go'in nowhere and i don't owe you shit. and you don't tell people whether they can come or go so get off your ego triip punk.
>
>
> "kah" <kah at kahnews.cjb.net> wrote in message news:Xns936BA6D2D8E10kahatkahnewsdotcjbdo at 64.94.241.201...
>
>
>
>
|
--
Goober King
Don't drink and drive on the Information Superhighway
gooberking at utn.cjb.net
Apr 28, 2003, 6:30pm
I don't have to know anything about the human behind this "BinaryBud"
persona. All I know is BinaryBud the poster, and as far as this
newsgroup is concerned, that's all that matters.
BinaryBud reminds me of the 40-something drunk guy sitting at the corner
of the bar, shouting his opinions for all the world to hear, and taking
offense at anyone who challenges him or tells him to shut up. I get this
image from the way BinaryBud posts: how he just says whatever's on his
mind, with little or no regard to the people he's responding to, not to
mention his typing style would seem to indicate that he doesn't take the
time to look over what he says or to think it through beforehand. He
also tends to get cocky/belligerent with anyone who attempts to argue
with him beyond a couple posts, and seems to insist on having the last word.
And now you all know where I get my NG2tNGs from. :)
[View Quote]binarybud wrote:
> LOL Like you even have the right to judge ones maturity level. beside you wanna fill us on in on how you can do that without even knowing who i am? are you even sure i'm a male? and what is my correct age? LOL i thought so.....
> and this, class, is someone who thinks he's gonna teach you(and me) something.
>
> "goober king" <gooberking at utn.cjb.net> wrote in message news:3EAD552E.9060909 at utn.cjb.net...
>
|
--
Goober King
Those who don't know, teach
gooberking at utn.cjb.net
Apr 24, 2003, 7:49pm
Wasn't that what WildAW was supposed to be for? :P
[View Quote]alphabit phalpha wrote:
> Well...AWCC is still a g rated world, but it would allow for the cits
> hanging there to make things work:)
> Tourists are allowed there already and there is a 500 user limit (I
> believe).
> So all that's left to do is set up an area with fun props and then get the
> word out.
> I started one corner of the Cys a while back...think I'll work on it some
> more:)
> What we could use right now is all of you folks offering some suggestions to
> what might make some fun stuff around there....like a bbq...picnic
> table...wading pool with fountain or whatever:)
> I also whirled the idea around to have the area generic so during holidays
> decorations could be put up easily and taken down.
> We neeeed input pleeeease!:)
>
> "truetome2" <TrueToMe2 at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message
> news:3ea8354d$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
> rules
>
> tables,
>
> folks...well...heck...move
>
>
>
|
--
Goober King
Wasting worlds
gooberking at utn.cjb.net
Apr 25, 2003, 9:51am
*smacks forehead* Here we go again...
[View Quote]whitestar wrote:
> By Whitestar
>
>
>
> Mr. Bruce has banned me from A!!CT I felt it neccary to let every on know
> that I can no longer be a part of A!!CT his childish tantrums and defiance
> harassment of the Citizens has forced me to start my own world he has blamed
> me for all his problems I told him that Defiance has cussed out my 13 year
> old daughter and was harassing females in A!!CT as a Care Taker I repeatly
> got complaints about Defiance on NCC what ever he calls himself his CIT # is
> 340479 this person is destroying people trust in A!!CT and because Mr. Bruce
> has no real control over his own world he lets it go on. I had plans to work
> with A!!CT and help them with sponsorships but once Defiance cussed me out a
> few times I got the big picture and realized that he had taken control of
> A!!CT from Mr. Bruce and there was no hope of fixing it Defiance has blocked
> people from his object path they challenged him on some graphics he had no
> right to sale so he blocked him from loading the objects and there was
> nothing I could Do about it so when he Shuts down A!!CT Again He is going to
> blame me I hope for the sake of all the builders in act that this will not
> happen. So when this happens im sorry but A!!CT is a train heading off the
> tracks and no one but Mr. Bruce can fix it and that's not likely to happen.
> If you have kids going into A!!CT keep an Eye on them Defiance is a Hothead,
> and even though A!!CT is a G rated world Defiance is a Care Taker so he can
> say anything he wants and no one will eject him. Again I'm sorry to all the
> great people that come in act to build and that might have got there hopes
> up that I could make A!!CT a great Place To hangout but I never have that
> kind of control over A!!CT I was promised that I could make some changes and
> that's why I took over the world to make A!!CT a Place you felt safe to let
> the kid's hangout build and bring their friends then sell corporate
> sponsorship but that was not what happened. So forgive me when Mr. Bruce
> Shuts Down A!!CT and blames me for it, that was never what I wanted I did
> not set out to deceive anyone and I will have a new world Open Soon that
> will be a Safe place to hang out.
> Whitestar
>
>
>
>
|
--
Goober King
Round and round and round we go
gooberking at utn.cjb.net
Apr 29, 2003, 1:57pm
I agree, IE is a crappy-assed browser. ;)
(For those who don't get it, AOL uses IE as its browser of choice)
[View Quote]dion wrote:
> Just as long as you don't use their crappy-assed browser :-P
>
> -Dion
>
> "bowen" <thisguyrules at 7k2.4mg.com.ANTISPAM> wrote in message
> news:3eade3d8 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
> "brock" <Brock at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message
> news:3eadd809$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
>
> Have you ever used AOL? (I've never been disconnected from AOL to date)
>
> --Bowen--
|
--
Goober King
Netscape/Mozilla wins again! :D
gooberking at utn.cjb.net
|
