Ok seems no one knows the answer to my question but I have found the answer
and it's quite clear and simple.
(2)
A plaintiff is not entitled by virtue of this section to any damages or to
any other pecuniary remedy, other than costs, if it is established that, at
the time of the conversion or detention:
(a)
the defendant was not aware, and had no reasonable grounds for suspecting,
that copyright subsisted in the work or other subject-matter to which the
action relates;
(b)
where the articles converted or detained were infringing copies-the
defendant believed, and had reasonable grounds for believing, that they were
not infringing copies; or
(c)
where an article converted or detained was a device used or intended to be
used for making articles-the defendant believed, and had reasonable grounds
for believing, that the articles so made or intended to be made were not or
would not be, as the case may be, infringing copies.
This is why he will not win, He by giving those objects to FriendPA and
allowing her to use them on her world meant that he gave her the right to
use those pbjects and to copy them. So it says here, the person would have
to commit copyright infringement and be aware of the infringement for him to
collect lots of damages. Here it states if the person is unaware of any
infringement of the copyright then read (c) Justin will never get past (c)
he allowed her to use them which means she was not aware or was there ever a
contract made or license that stated how she could use them, he in essence
gave her full right with no limitations to the copyright of the objects by
allowing her to upload the objects to her path.
[View Quote]"chucks party" <Chucks_Party at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3aad95ea at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> So if I make an object or objects "for" a world how does that differ from
> making a picture "for" a company, you would not then relinquish all rights
> to it? There is also another problem. AW says that if objects that are
used
> in your name and cit# for bldg, those objects and the entire build are
yours
> until such time that your citizenship expires or is not renewed, then at
> that point and only then do they become community property. Justin took a
> bot into NYW and copied an entire city that wasn't in his name or cit#.
This
> is totally against AW rules. I have not been able to find anything that
> agrees with your point about taking rights away once something is given.
> Just because Justin did not give PA a license to use the objects, there
are
> things whether they are implied or intended because of what the person
that
> owns them does with them. If you put objects on a world that can be used
to
> copy them many times more over you can't possibly exspect them then at
> anytime in the future to not be copied or then turn around and make them
> impossible for someone to use. I have not found anything that gives
someone
> the right that made something to change their mind of what their
intentions
> were when they were given to someone else to use. If you can find
something
> somewhere in writing I would like to see the URL to it.
> Chucks Party
>
>
> "agent1" <Agent1 at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message
> news:3aad7504$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> news:3aad4c1d at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> invitation
> that he
> people to
the
> that
> here
Why?
> to
> saw
> can't
> after
my
> hard drive then whether I sell it to them or give
> drive to their hard drive with my permission. I relinquish all rights to
> that picture
> get
> fault
hire
> and the company owns all rights to it.
thing
> applies, any and all things uploaded to
rights
> to
> means
> Especially
> the
> 7.
> Yahoo
> Content
> Yahoo
only
> for
be
> means
to
> with
I
> was to create files and send them to a hosting company, they do NOT own
them
> simply because the files are on their servers. I would have to sign (or
> agree to...) a contract that has a clause such as the one above.
to
> use
are
> giving those rights to use the material or in
and
> no
his
> from
well
> now
> you
and
> not
> you
> how
laid
> out
it
> is
l
> ong
correctly),
> EVERYTHING created by someone is already under copyright anyway. There is
no
> need to file a notice to copyright it. I am assuming that FriendPA didn't
> pay a cent for the use of the objects, so what does s/he lose by not being
> able to use them? If it is such a problem, why not make your own set of
> objects?
> owner grants the work to the public domain. That right was
> NYW.
> "public domain" about it.
prudent
> copyright
> page, I
> use
the
this
strings
objects
> in
> and what the owner is
is
> not
> them to
> option to do so.
> before
> far as
on
> the
community
to
> be
> foundation
> don't
to
> put
tell
> me
Justin,
> who
> even
that
> we
be
> world,
of
> the
> this
remains
in
> the
> concerned
> in AW
Chucks
public
>
>
|
