1  2  3  4  5  |   Order by default

Dec 18, 1998, 11:22am

doesn't seem to wkr and I am calling aw_state_change but all other
zeroes in other functuins work just fine.

Dec 18, 1998, 9:17pm

k :)

[View Quote] > Lets see the code Josh.
>
[View Quote]

Dec 18, 1998, 9:20pm

if (strstr (aw_string (AW_CHAT_MESSAGE), "bot-ground")) {
aw_int_set (AW_MY_Y, 0);
aw_state_change ();
}

[View Quote] > Lets see the code Josh.
>
[View Quote]

Dec 19, 1998, 2:54am

Yes I added a printf after it, and I used the strstr to execute all my other
commands and they came up working fine... (don't really wanna give out much more
code than this cause most of it's secretive till I finish up the bot)

[View Quote] > Not a lot of code there bud. Anyway, let me ask some questions.
>
> How do you know that the strstr is working and it is actually executing the
> aw_int_set? Have you added a printf or something inside the if statement.
>
> Check the return codes of both calls. The doc doesn't actually say that it
> returns a error code. It just says that it returns an int which maybe an error
> code.
>
[View Quote]

Dec 21, 1998, 4:53pm

its the AW_MY_Y not anything else.

[View Quote] > There is not much I can do then.
>
> One approach is to start to remove code until your program ends up
> very simple. Once simple it becomes easy to debug.
>
[View Quote]

Dec 21, 1998, 8:21pm

it accepts all other alts jsut for some reason it wont move back to 0

[View Quote] > Are you saying that can right a simple program and get the
> aw_int_set... not to work?
>
> We are all moving our bots around AW using the same mechanisms so I
> doubt that it is the sdk.
>
> So write a little bot program that initially puts your avatar at 10n
> 10w, then aw_wait a while and try your two lines of code aw_int_set
> and aw_state_change. If you can prove that this code does not work
> then we will have something to look at.
>
[View Quote]

Dec 23, 1998, 7:20pm

well after trying what everyone sai dna dmove it a cm it did reset to 0m

[View Quote] > It's always possible that there might be a problem here, but I'm not aware
> of any...I will try to look into this when I get a chance. If the problem
> is in the browser's avatar rendering code, then you would think it could be
> duplicated simply by having someone stand in one place and move up and down
> using +/-, after using the '5' key to completely stop all horizontal motion.
> If the bug is as Xela describes it, then after some point presumably an
> observer would no longer see the other's change in altitude....
>
> -Roland
>
[View Quote]

Dec 18, 1998, 11:21pm

heres the error I got
Error 45940856

Dec 23, 1998, 8:27pm

Heres and idea for the sdk
why not have ti so we can make a directory on our object servers that we
cna put avatars in that ONLY bots cna access so that way if were
developing a game like maybe an RPG players wont be able to use monster
avatars and so on...

Dec 24, 1998, 2:22am

Hi all,
I will be needign a tema of good AWSDK programmers here soon for a game
being developed in AWGames if you need more info please e-mail me at
jrrodgers at usa.net

Dec 29, 1998, 10:42pm

Ok when a AW__EVENT_CHAT is called with AW_AVATAR_X , Y, Z and YAW it
selects a random avatar and not the avatar that said the message, is
this a possible problem or is it supposed to do that?

Dec 30, 1998, 6:16am

Ok, I just wanted to mention this as it may of been a possible problem...

[View Quote] > Josh, you can't ask the position of someone that talks, you are
> probably getting the data of the last aw_event_avatar_add or
> aw_event_avatar_change produced by anyone arriving or moving. The only
> way you can keep track of positions (and avatar number and last
> performed gesture) is by storing these values until the person leaves
> the area, when the bot gets the delete event. If someone talks, you
> must then search for his/her position in your mini-database.
>
> XelaG.
>
[View Quote]

Nov 6, 1998, 11:16pm

I recommend gonig to
http://www.realifeworldsdownload.com
RealLife is very awesome! it has kinds of stuff I've been using ti since 84
and theres always upgrades every day and the source code to is open to
everyone so you can add in your own features (called inventions)

[View Quote] > The world is not interactive enough. Objects need to interact. We need
> different lighting effects. Make it to at night you will need some form
> of light to see. We should drive cars instead of walking. Or for long
> distance we should fly. Gravity should effect buildings. There needs to
> be police and firefighters. Incase a fire gets your house. But have a
> way to redo what was burnt. We hospitals for when you fall off a house.
> Stuff like this. Also we need money. So we jsut cant build anything
> anywhere. We should have to use money and buy stuff for a house. Then
> you will get a job to make money and stuff like that. I hope you
> understand me.

Nov 21, 1998, 10:02pm

Thats why COF isn't doing custom av support :) someone could make a naked
av, or write profanity all over it and go into aw

[View Quote] > my perfect avatar woul be a nude exotic male dancer with moves you have
> never seen, and a big... uhhh... brain!
>
> hehe, just kidding... though, it would be preeeetty cool!

Nov 22, 1998, 12:05am

Well it will eventually happen but not at the current time, Roland is jsut
the programmer he has no say so of what will happen to aw

[View Quote] > You like staring at yourself then?.
>
[View Quote]

Nov 22, 1998, 4:00am

Yes he can program whatever he wants but he doesn't have say if it will be
released...
And I've also been in aw a lot longer than you, whats your cit# like
24567486979438509769490834?

[View Quote] > Just the programmer , he says what is and isn't possible, as he is the only
> programmer no one is around to argue with him. He does have a say but not the
> last word, big difference.
>
> Things like outgoing saved Telegrams, Muli object links for world owners, file
> to file transfer within AW, basically Roland can code whatever, and it will be
> added as all enhance the product.
>
> Klassi
>
[View Quote]

Nov 22, 1998, 4:05am

I stand corrected its 287900 compared to my 139767 (which is from a while back
comparted to yours when AW was free, when we didn't have telegrams, tourists and it
was owned by Worlds Inc.

[View Quote] > Yes he can program whatever he wants but he doesn't have say if it will be
> released...
> And I've also been in aw a lot longer than you, whats your cit# like
> 24567486979438509769490834?
>
[View Quote]

Nov 22, 1998, 9:00pm

I fyou think palying with sticks is fun than you know nothing...

[View Quote] > I see in ALL your time within the Active World community you learn't to be diplomatic,
> personally I don't care if you have shares in AW, IF something Roland codes enhances
> AW then it will be added...
>
> As for numbers they are just that, if you think having a lower number means anything
> you have problems.
>
> Klassi
>
[View Quote]

Nov 22, 1998, 9:01pm

YOu know you should shut up, I"m jsut saying that people can put disgusting
stuff on avataras, and I was only saying what I heard, dumbass

[View Quote] > So??
> You wish to go back to no tourists?
> Wow yur arrogant!
> You may be longer in Aw than a lot of others, but you don't sound like a
> real *citizen*.
> You talk like you wannabe left alone. Then what the heck are you ding in
> aw!?!?!
> Maybe you should try 3dstudio. There you can build whatever you lik, faster
> and better and absolutely *nobody* will come bother you...
>
[View Quote]

Nov 22, 1998, 9:03pm

I don't know it all so maybe you should shutup, and maybe you SHOULD sotp
picking on a 14 year old and go get a life and play with your people your own
age sparky...

[View Quote] > Is THAT the best argument you can come up with? :-(
> Like that proves anything at all...
> You sound like a little child!
>
> Besides; i agree with Klassi;
> If Roland says custom avatars going to happen, what reason heave you *not*
> to believe that? Well??
> Maybe Roland doesn't have the final decission.
> But if he says yes and you say no; I'd believe HIM.
> Like *you* know it all.
>
[View Quote]

Nov 22, 1998, 9:04pm

I was just saying what I heard from someone, and I have a ponit someone could go
into aw wearing profanity all voer their avatar, so if they do get aroudn to putting
it in, Roland should make an option where the world owner can turn off using custom
avatars...

[View Quote] > Same here I will beleive it when I see it, but I do believe COF are working
> towards many enhancements to the AW browswer, I am glad that Roland didn't say
> when, it would have been nice but at least no riots should break out!.. :-)
>
> Klassi
[View Quote]

Nov 22, 1998, 9:59pm

Junior? LMAO
You know something, I'm not some little thumb sucking baby or a child, like most
people think a 14 year old is, hell I grew up in a family of adults so go ahead
treat me like an adult but I just don't give a damn about this post anymore, it is
lame and POINTLESS.

[View Quote] > I dunno, now you pull the age trick...... In another message you could well be
> asking why under 18 cannot be PKs. The 'get a life' is wearing thin!.. Play with
> people your own age, since when did age have a bearing on an opinion, I am open
> minded and treat all the same, if you think you need special treatment due to
> your tender years maybe you could start up a Junior AW community group.
>
> What you think is being picked on is simply replies to your previous posts.
>
[View Quote]

Nov 23, 1998, 8:47pm

I"m not an asshole, you don't even know who I'm in AW, and what I was syaing is
that I've been in aw for a while and havn't seen much changes other than
telegrams, and instant updates and thats about it (ever so excited! about it)

[View Quote] > I'm glad the asshole doesn't have his own avatar in AW... i'd bang on my
> puter's reset button if I'd see him... :)
>
> --
>
> Fluxen Dean-Christian Strik
> ICQ: 11760568 ISG RhinoSoft
> fluxen at bigfoot.com dean2 at bigfoot.com
>
> Real computer scientists despise the idea of actual hardware. Hardware has
> limitations, software doesn't. It's a real shame that Turing machines are so
> poor at I/O.
>
[View Quote]

Nov 23, 1998, 8:48pm

Geeze, you people are very very very stupid I was jsut saying something AND YOU
ALL HAVE TO JUMP ON ME! get a life!

[View Quote] > No you shut up. You like low numbers? Okay, I put you in 1st place on my
> "Annoying AW Newsgroups Posters List". Satisfied?
>
> --
>
> Fluxen Dean-Christian Strik
> ICQ: 11760568 ISG RhinoSoft
> fluxen at bigfoot.com dean2 at bigfoot.com
>
> Real computer scientists despise the idea of actual hardware. Hardware has
> limitations, software doesn't. It's a real shame that Turing machines are so
> poor at I/O.
>
[View Quote]

Nov 23, 1998, 8:49pm

I have the right to come here if I want...

[View Quote] > So what? If you really ain't a thumb-sucking baby or what, you should be
> able to stand profanity... or not, just quit then. And never come back,
> please.
>
> --
>
> Fluxen Dean-Christian Strik
> ICQ: 11760568 ISG RhinoSoft
> fluxen at bigfoot.com dean2 at bigfoot.com
>
> Real computer scientists despise the idea of actual hardware. Hardware has
> limitations, software doesn't. It's a real shame that Turing machines are so
> poor at I/O.
>
[View Quote]

Nov 23, 1998, 8:50pm

I"m not a baby, you know you peopel should get a life I was only trying to make
a point and all you just go ahead on jump all over me!

[View Quote] > Or a baby aw community group.... oh "sorry", jost wasn't a baby right?
> Sorry, I'm mixing up things.... he reminds me so much of a baby I can't get
> lost of that picture... :)
>
> --
>
> Fluxen Dean-Christian Strik
> ICQ: 11760568 ISG RhinoSoft
> fluxen at bigfoot.com dean2 at bigfoot.com
>
> Real computer scientists despise the idea of actual hardware. Hardware has
> limitations, software doesn't. It's a real shame that Turing machines are so
> poor at I/O.
>
[View Quote]

Nov 23, 1998, 8:51pm

You should stop posting! and you should not jump all voer people because they
were only trying to make a point eh? GUYESS WHAT! I have the right to an opinion
and You people do not have the right to make fun of it!


[View Quote] > Now *who* should shut up and *who* should get a life??
>
> Lemme answer this rightaway:
>
> *YOU* should shut up!
> *YOU* should get a life! OFFLINE, that is!
>
> --
>
> Fluxen Dean-Christian Strik
> ICQ: 11760568 ISG RhinoSoft
> fluxen at bigfoot.com dean2 at bigfoot.com
>
> Real computer scientists despise the idea of actual hardware. Hardware has
> limitations, software doesn't. It's a real shame that Turing machines are so
> poor at I/O.
>
[View Quote]

Nov 23, 1998, 8:52pm

I do have an intellegence. Only people who reply with lousy flames because I had
an opinion (hey looks its a new word to you!) have no intellegence

[View Quote] > Childs are said to have some kind of intelligence.... josh obviously
> doesn't... he's just a 14 year old asshole...
>
> --
>
> Fluxen Dean-Christian Strik
> ICQ: 11760568 ISG RhinoSoft
> fluxen at bigfoot.com dean2 at bigfoot.com
>
> Real computer scientists despise the idea of actual hardware. Hardware has
> limitations, software doesn't. It's a real shame that Turing machines are so
> poor at I/O.
>
[View Quote]

Nov 23, 1998, 8:56pm

Heres an idea, lets take this to e-maila nd flame each other for no damn reason
eh? You people sit there and jump all over me because I was only making a point
eh?

[View Quote] > That argument was indeed a bit limited (of *Josh* ;-) )
> Anyway, I don't seem to be getting *your* point really...
>
[View Quote]

Dec 6, 1998, 4:00pm

It's just a effect the backdrop creates for instance I have a dark lunar
backdrop in my world but when I change it to lets say rus_day it gets a lot
brighter and feels cheerier

[View Quote] > That's just fake. The objects look the same at night.
>
[View Quote]

1  2  3  4  5  |   Order by default