1  ...  3  4  5  6  7  8  ...  18  |   Order by default

Mar 11, 2003, 5:48am

Afraid I cannot, I am not a lawyer specialized in international law. But if
a country , any country, yes even USA included, attacks another country,
they are starting a war. In my books the one starting a war is the "bad
guy". This is nothing I have come up with, it has been discussed in UN.

Drac
sw chris <chrisw10 at skywalkeronline.net> kirjoitti
viestissä:3e6d6225$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Well you need to answer this question to find the answer to yours. Who
made
> it a rule that pre-emptive defensive strikes were prohibited by
> international law?
>
> Chris
>
[View Quote]

Mar 11, 2003, 5:49am

Yes I was joking, of course I know what you mean. It is only ok if USA do it
:)

Drac
sw chris <chrisw10 at skywalkeronline.net> kirjoitti
viestissä:3e6d6180$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> You know what I mean. Stop playing word games. Or at least prove that
you
> aren't before I answer that question. :) This debate tires me.
>
> Chris
>
[View Quote]

Mar 11, 2003, 5:51am

Most iraqi ppl do not live in USA tho. Have you met the iraqi ppl abroad
personally or seen them on CNN ( or similar)?

Drac
sw chris <chrisw10 at skywalkeronline.net> kirjoitti
viestissä:3e6d61db$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> All of the Iraqis I have seen, in the United States or abroad, have been
> 100% in favor of a coalition going into Iraq and taking out Saddam.
Refute
> that.
>
> SW Chris
>
[View Quote]

Mar 11, 2003, 5:53am

Europe- Hitler, we learned somethig
USA- Bush, hopefully you will also?

Drac
sw chris <chrisw10 at skywalkeronline.net> kirjoitti
viestissä:3e6d5f30$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> um... Huh? Explain in fewer words, please. :)
>
> Chris
>
[View Quote]

Mar 11, 2003, 7:17pm

You are probably right on this point.
I remember reading something about chemical, by all means non-lethal beeing
used, but I cannot back it up ( maybe I simply should say: I have proof but
cannot give them out in the name of national security, because that is whar
the rest of the word is supposed to be pleased with when asking USA for
proofs).

I will try to investigate more into this tho. Funny thing tho is that if you
pour water on the enemy it is teaoretically using a chemical weapon.

Drac
carolann <carolannh at charter.net> kirjoitti
viestissä:3e6db93e at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
[View Quote]

Mar 11, 2003, 10:53pm

I have never said Iraque do not have weapons, I belive ALL countries have,
maybe not the Vatican State tho.
I have only said I have not seen any proof Iraue would have some so called
illegal weapons, and even if they had, I still do not think it is up to one
country to attack them , but it is a matter of UN to FIRST try to get to a
peacefull solution, and if that do not work, then do what might be needed.

I really do not see how it would give away anything if someone showed Blix
on a map where the weapons are. USA do not have to give away the entire
operation how they found out, just simple show Blix on a map where to look.
It do not even have to come out in public; just present the info within the
security council.

Drac
bowen <thisguyrules at 7k2.4mg.com.ANTISPAM> kirjoitti
viestissä:3e6e5ece at server1.Activeworlds.com...
but
whar
>
> The difference is your information doesn't rely on people being in
dangerous
> situations to gather intel. You may or may not know if they have evidence
or not;
> but if you say something like that where there's some proof you don't,
then it's
> horrible. Go ahead and prove Iraq doesn't have weapons, then I'll believe
you.
>
> Just because you can't see them doesn't mean they're not there. I suppose
if you
> face a wall in a dark room with your eyes close the wall doesn't exist
either.
>
> --Bowen--
>
>

Mar 12, 2003, 2:12am

I just noticed I accuse USA of the same thing I practice myself; not obaying
laws I do not belive in.
There are many in my opinion stupid laws and I simply ignore them. USA has
showed an ignorant attitude towards UN, just like I do when it comes to laws
I belive are just there to limit my individual freedom.

Maybe we all should simply start ignoring all laws, if we feel someone has
acted wrong or done something we do not belive to be right; we simply go and
punish them according to our moral standards. Why go to the police; since we
know better anyway.

Drac

Mar 12, 2003, 6:01am

You are funny Bowen, if I say something that upset you and then say I was
wrong you are upset again *LOL*

Drac
bowen <thisguyrules at 7k2.4mg.com.ANTISPAM> kirjoitti
viestissä:3e6ed1a7 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
explain exactly
know. (to
>
> Honestly, if I can add on to what I said, please... just shut the hell up.
>
> --Bowen--
>
>

Mar 12, 2003, 2:44pm

I am sad to hear you do not like yourself.

Drac
bowen <thisguyrules at 7k2.4mg.com.ANTISPAM> kirjoitti
viestissä:3e6f60cd at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
[View Quote]

Mar 13, 2003, 12:34am

Should not be so hard to get one person inside a country, even maybe use
someone already located there.
The problem would more like be getting in range of Saddam.
Why bother getting out after Saddam is dead; is not everyone supposed to
dance in the streets?
And even if the sniper will get killed, it is only one ( 2) lives, instead
of a number nobody knows yet.
If the sniper gets away alive tho, he could maybe take out Bush next. Then
world would have gotten rid of 2 "dictators" :-)

Drac
sw chris <chrisw10 at skywalkeronline.net> kirjoitti
viestissä:3e6fafdb$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> How do you get the sniper into Baghdad? How do you extract him out after
> Saddam is dead?
>
> Chris
>
[View Quote]

Mar 13, 2003, 12:40am

The logic in this is a bit unclear to me. I do not support terror tho.
What comes to point #4, I guess you mean you suspect Iraq support terror ?

The basks in northern Spain is also know to use terror, so IRA in
North-Irland. Should we also bomb those areas and all organisations and
countries supporting them ? With your logic one could probably say that
France support the basks and the catholic church IRA,, so maybe bomb France
and the Vatican State also?

Drac
sw chris <chrisw10 at skywalkeronline.net> kirjoitti
viestissä:3e6fb0fc at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Chris: "Iraq was never a threat until after September 11, which happened
SIX
> MONTHS after Bush took office"
> If this do not mean you are blaming Iraque for what happened Septemper
11th,
> then I do not know what would.
>
> Let me clarify then.
>
> 1. The War on Terrorism started after September 11.
> 2. The War on Terrorism's purpose is NOT to target ONLY the people
> responsible for September 11.
> 3. Al Qaeda is responsible for September 11.
> 4. Iraq supports terror. It is a target.
>
> Conclusion: Iraq has nothing to do with September 11. But it has
something
> to do with terrorism. Terrorism and Sept 11 are not the same thing.
>
[View Quote]

Mar 13, 2003, 3:34am

Sorry I forgot, it is up to USA alone to decide when someone is bad and what
kind of terrorism is bad, and most of all whom to attack and when. Again
sorry, my bad.

Drac
sw chris <chrisw10 at skywalkeronline.net> kirjoitti
viestissä:3e7007f3$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> You assume I have a one-track mind. :) Every situation requires a
> different kind of action.
>
>
[View Quote]

Mar 13, 2003, 3:43am

I guess I need to specific a bit more what I need with nazi. Not nazi in its
original meaning, but more like a person who act in the same spirit of
nazist did , and it can by all mean be for a totally different cause. An
example of this is the israelian goverment who treats the palestinian people
in a similar way that germany trated the jews, gypsies etc.
So I did not mean you would go around waving a swastika flag ( not that the
swastika is a bad symbol, I remember it beeing a symbol for the sun in
India(?) and Finland used it a long time before Hitler decided he likes
it ).
I more like meant a nazi in a way to describe a person who tries to inforce
his belives and moral standards on others with force. A person who only
belive his right is right.
Although a CAT cap and flanelshirt might look good on Bob when he sits in
Lucy's diner in Texas, it might not look good on Abdullah in Mofat's cafe´in
Bagdad. I think when US goverment realize this, we have taken a big step
forward.

I do not know your friend Dickwad, is he in AW also ?

Drac
sw chris <chrisw10 at skywalkeronline.net> kirjoitti
viestissä:3e7001fd$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I don't listen to CNN. Think I'm a Nazi? Ask my friend. He's Jewish.
> Dickwad.
>
> Chris
>
[View Quote]

Mar 13, 2003, 3:46am

I do not see the importance of who made/ wrote the rule. It was most likely
prepared by a commity then taken for vote.
The question is more like that it is there, not who in specific has written
it.

Drac
sw chris <chrisw10 at skywalkeronline.net> kirjoitti
viestissä:3e70068a$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> If the qualification of that question is needing to be a lawyer
specializing
> in international law, then none of us should be talking.
>
> Chris
>
[View Quote]

Mar 17, 2003, 8:09am

It might be hunting season for those suckers tho.

God save us from americans
Drac

truetome2 <TrueToMe2 at my.activeworlds.com> kirjoitti
viestissä:3e757430 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Blank
> Ok, sorry if this takes up a lot of space but just thought you would like
to
> see what some of our boys & girls have done to impress our enemies. I know
I
> would be "very scared" if I looked up and saw this over head.
>
> God Bless America
> TrueToMe2
>
>
>

Mar 18, 2003, 1:47am

You are right that I have not personally experienced any oppression, but if
you are familiar with the history of Finland, you might know that we have
had to fight very hard for our independence against Russia and Soviet.
1939 Soviet decided that they will libereate the finnish people from the
oppression of the land and factoryowners; they made a fake attack towards
themselves and blamed on Finland. They attacked us and one of the first
thing they did was to bomb Helsinki and only civilians died. Soviet
proceeded a bit in the beginning, but there was no finns to liberete;
everyone fought against it. They even had to "import" people from Belarus to
act as liberated finns, so that it would look better.
A war to liberate a population, a war to make peace,, it sounds familiar ,
huh ?

I also do not see why I cannot be against an attack, just because I have not
suffered from oppression personally.
I just saw parts of the speach Bush gave on TV, and the message was clear:
We are not going to care what UN says, we do as we want ( I doubt you will
argue this summary). We have to remember that USA is a member of UN and with
that it has agreed to follow the rules of it; and now USA is not going to do
it. I am just afraid this will be a signal to other countries also: It is ok
to screw UN if what one do feels right.

Drac
sw chris <chrisw10 at skywalkeronline.net> kirjoitti
viestissä:3e76542e at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Finland. He hasn't known a day of oppression in his life, and he doesn't
> want anyone to screw that up for him. :)
>
> Chris
>
[View Quote]

Mar 18, 2003, 1:48am

Of course! Only the press writing what US govermant tells them to do is
right :-)

Drac
sw chris <chrisw10 at skywalkeronline.net> kirjoitti
viestissä:3e765447 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Considering the source of that comment (Libyan press), I'll ignore that.
:P
>
> SW Chris
>
[View Quote]

Mar 18, 2003, 4:20am

I think he deserve all bashing he can get :)
I am not anti american or anti this or that. I simply have a problem when
someone brakes rules one has agreed to follow.
What comes to Bush, I dislike him because he has no dimplomatic skills. I
like the general american people and I feel sorry for you, for having a
president like that. Your economy is going strongly down and the hate
towards USA is increasing in world every time Bush opens his mouth.
What comes to the war that is about to begin. I feel sorry for all the
people that will get killed in it, both iraqi and US, UK and Australian.
Still I see it as Iraq is the one getting attacked this time ( I doubt
anyone can disagree with this) and I tend to go on the side of the weaker.
The war itself might not take so long, I am more afarid of what will happens
after it, when the revenge strikes begin. I am sure I will hear whining in
these NGs when some bombs explode in various cities. Not that I support
terrorism, but I will say then. I ( many ppl) told you to stay the hell out
of Iraq, you decided not to; take the consequenses.

I just see that Bush is the biggest treat to world peace, therefor I bash
him. When he has bombed Iraq, what next, North Korea? and then? when will it
stop?
I am also worried about the hate towrads Europe he is causing. People were
carrying signs saying Bomb France. Some people are planning to rename
hamburgers and french fries. If he was a good president he would tell his
people that France and Germany are not the enemies of USA, they have a
different opinion in this war matter, and they are entitled to it. But has
he made even the smalles effort to this? No, it even seems he want a
conflict between USA and Europe.
I just hope the people of USA realize how dangerous their president is,
before it is to late.

Drac
ryan jacob <ryan_jacob at hotmail.com> kirjoitti
viestissä:3e76a6fd$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I don't see your strong anti-americanism still...it seems to me that you
> disagree with our possibilities, but why resort to petty bashing of our
> president?
>
> Ryan Jacob
>
[View Quote]

Mar 18, 2003, 4:33am

I have not choosen to belive the libyan press, but I have neither choosen to
belive the "US" press.
I think people should be more critical towards all press in general.

Drac
sw chris <chrisw10 at skywalkeronline.net> kirjoitti
viestissä:3e76a612 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> If you choose to believe a state-run press of a dictatorial government and
> not the free press of the United States (whose correspondents don't even
get
> invited to the White House Christmas party if they report too much
> negativity about the administration, and who are also the correspondants I
> prefer to listen to), then that's your perogative, not mine. :)
>
> SW Chris
>
[View Quote]

Mar 18, 2003, 1:37pm

I have never said Saddam has not braken any rules. I am just saying USA is
braking the rules if they attack without the blessing of UN. 2 illegal
things do not make one right . In math negative x negative is positive, but
not when it comes to braking the law.
It is a bit the same if you feel your neighbour has done something illegal;
do you go over and shoot him or do you go to the police?
The so called proofs USA presented has not made a great impression on anyone
( maybe UK and OZ).
Now the weapon inspectors are forced to flee the missiles of USA; I do not
call that justice. If USA is ignoring UN totally and "running over" the rest
of the world it cannot be right.

Drac
binarybud <leo at realPANTStourvision.com> kirjoitti
viestissä:3e7721d9$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> "someone brakes rules one has agreed to follow" no way dude prove
this statement....your on;ly looking in one direction on this.....Saddam is
the one breaking rules and he needs to be taken care of in his own way. You
cannot see past your obvious bias.
>
>
>
>
[View Quote]

Mar 18, 2003, 1:39pm

I was not refering to the entire press, only the main media like CNN. I
should have been more accurate.

Drac
binarybud <leo at realPANTStourvision.com> kirjoitti
viestissä:3e77224e$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> he get with it, and learn more about which you critisize. The US Gov
dos not tell the press to do anything...anyone with half a brain knows
this....only people sheltered in their own thoughts(ignorant) would think
otherwise.
>
>
[View Quote]

Mar 19, 2003, 5:04am

Might be UN has failed, however, UN was established after WW II to prevent a
new "Hitler" . The actions of USA in this case are very similar to what
Germany did before WW II. Make demands you know cannot be fulfilled. Claim
the other country to be a treat. Go to war, dont care what the rest of world
is thinking.
It is exremely dangerous when someone especially in the security council
goes solo. It takes away all ( the little that was left) credibility from
UN. We are going back to a similar time than the 30-ies. This time we have
international rules and laws, but they are ignored, it is like having none
at all.
Everyone seems to be bashing Saddam for not following this and that rule.
Yet they have found no proof he has braken any of these rules. People seems
to ignore the fact that when USA attack Iraq, it is not more justified than
when Saddam attacked Kuwait. An attack is an attack.
My point has not been bashing USA ( Bush yes). If some country do not
follow international law, it deserves to be bashed, may it be Sierra Leone,
Iraq or even allmighty USA.

Drac
binarybud <leo at realPANTStourvision.com> kirjoitti
viestissä:3e7750a4$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> your DEAD wrong on this...The UN has failed the world and is in WIMP
mode....Someone needs to defend the world against Dictators like this.
PERIOD. Get off your USA BASHING .....try making some sense. Hows about
you read those PAST resolutions that were UNANIMOUS .....how come your
ignoring history dude.?
>
>
[View Quote]

Mar 19, 2003, 5:11am

A while back I was surfing the website of CNN and they were calling the
possible iraqi war something like the liberation of the iraqi people. I
think press should try to be neutral and a media that call ANY war a
liberation etc cannot be trustworthy.

Drac
binarybud <leo at realPANTStourvision.com> kirjoitti
viestissä:3e7751af$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> my response is the same where you getting this crap from besides your
own delusions?
>
>
[View Quote]

Mar 19, 2003, 2:30pm

I belive nations are to belived to be what picture they give to the rest of
the world . In other worlds what shows is believed to be the "voice" of the
entire nation. Finns are for example considered shy and quiet, we have weird
habits like hitting ourselves with branches of birch, we drink a lot of
vodka and are more or less drunk all the time. We also like to fight with
knives.
Personally I drink about once per 3 year or so, but since we are considered
to be drunks, not much I can do about it, just live with it and make fun of
it :)
So I belive when ppl say "americans" they do not refer to every single
citizen of USA, but more like to the "noisiest" group that we as foreigner
see, and that group happens to be the president in your case. It is often
easier to see faults from outside, so I am sure "americans" see the faults
of "europeans" better than we do ourselves ?

Drac
carolann <carolannh at charter.net> kirjoitti
viestissä:3e7887af$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> See what I mean? One (1) person made that comment, and no Americans even
> responded to it, but yet it is credited to ALL Americans, apparently. Can
> you tell me without making any generalizations swe, why do Lybians always
> generalize like that? ;-)
>
[View Quote]

Mar 19, 2003, 2:36pm

Jeez *LOL*
I think the goverment brainwash has worked very well in your case :)
May I ask how much TV time has all the anti-war demonstartions gotten on
your TV?

One thing I also find amusing, you speak " we americans" wanting us to
belive that what you say is what all americans say, yet if I say americans I
am accused of generalizing , how come ?

FYI, if you are looking for liers, do not go so far, you can start with your
own president. I am not saying that other do not lie either, of course they
do, but don´t belive your goverment is any purer.

Drac
binarybud <leo at realPANTStourvision.com> kirjoitti
viestissä:3e7878ca$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> FYI i never watch CNN i prefer NBC news. and guess what.... our news
is news not made up government shit like goes on around the world. If our
news oganizations are not truthfull they do not last long .. We happen to
know the truth when it slaps us in the face, unlike many other nations. We
do have a freedom of speech....to let people like yourselves spout off your
drivel..... WE(as americans) can see right through your lies. Why you may
ask.? Because we have had free speech all our lives....we know how to
handle it. The people of MOST other countries cannot handle free
speech....so when they think they have the ability to speek freely....they
feel that speaking lies is ok....cause ya CAN do it...hehehe ... Lie on
people WE see right through it. <grin>
>
>
[View Quote]

Mar 19, 2003, 2:37pm

Most interesting link, I hope all the Bush supporters will also read it :)

Drac
kf <none at junk.mail> kirjoitti viestissä:3E7753C4.7000 at junk.mail...
> http://www.disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=Weapons_of_mass_deception
>
>
> :-)
>
>
>
>
[View Quote]

Mar 20, 2003, 4:02am

I have always hated situations where I have to choose between 2 bad things;
I am a lazy s.o.b. so I prefer it to be easy :)

I just think it is dangerous when one country ( any country) takes law in
its own hands, it sets a bad example for others and can lead to a total
chaos in the end.

Drac
baron sweetman <petrossadeletethis at msn.com> kirjoitti
viestissä:Xns9343DEAA3C135petrossa at 64.94.241.201...
> "count dracula" <dracula at netsonic.fi> wrote in
> news:3e789cb8$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com:
>
>
> I am dutch, i lived in the middle east in the the 70's, i've been bombed
> and hid in bombshelters. If i can choose between a corrupt and cynical
> 'leader' of Europe like France or Germany, or an airhead like Bush i'll
> choose Bush anyday. Do we all forget where France was during the second
> world war? Do we remember where the US was in those years?
>
> I am frankly much more scared of a world where France is the leader then
> where a cowboy is the leader.
>
> did anyone ever read about the corruption of Chirac? How he only escapes
> prosecution because he is the president? Do we recognise the vast
> financial interests France has in Iraq? How Chirac until recently
> greeted Saddam as ' a personal friend?'
>
> Sure US cant wash its hands in innocence, their using Saddam as a pawn
> against Iran we all remember. But if i have to choose between the gain
> of removing Saddam and scaring the shit out of the other extremist
> countries or leting France keep us on the road of complacency to further
> their interest of 7 billion dollar development contracts i'll choose the
> cowboy anyday.
>
> For sure the cowboy needs a braintransplant, but i'd rather see the
> middle east kick started into the present, instead of trying to placate
> the inplacable.
>
>
>
>

Mar 24, 2003, 8:06am

I think one problem is that people are taking everything personally.
For example if I say " America is acting against international law by
attacking a country", people will somehow take it as I say they have
personally comitted a crime, when in fact I am refering to the goverment. I
guess I sometimes cause this kind of confusion, maybe because my limited
knowledge about english language. I just do not feel like typing out " the
current political leadership and its foreign politic" , it is just so much
more simply to say americans.

Not sure if AW is a place to debate it, but as I go to a bar or shop and
whomever I talk with, Iraq comes up, so I do not see why not here, since it
is in the mind of most people.

Drac
johnny b <jbitt2ATjunoDOTcom> kirjoitti
viestissä:3e7dfb14$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I don't deny the fact that everyone here has a right to their opinion, and
I am VERY well informed when It comes to such matters as
> are involved here.
>
> What I DO object to, is this ongoing america(n)-bashing campaign........
at least in here
>
> AW is a mutli cultural venue, for the most part.... many people from many
countries, races, religion, backgrounds, etc. That much we
> all know...
>
> But I personally feel that AW really may not be the best place for all
this arguement.
> I feel that all this does is create bad feelings, suspicions, anger, and
even hate towards others here.
> No matter how well we think we "know" those others, we truly cannot
without real personal interaction.
> Words are so easly typed and sent aloft into the ether we call the
internet...
>
> I for one come here to enjoy some of my spare time, to unwind after a long
day at work, whatever.
> I enjoy chatting with my friends from all over the world immensely, As do
I enjoy modelling and building my own worlds.
>
> What it all boils down to, is the fact that I think most of us would agree
that we come here for some manner of enjoyment.
>
> But all this dissention and negative talk takes so much of that enjoyment
away.
>
> I'm sure I can't be the only one who feels this way.......
>
> Can't we just leave all the politics and such for more appropriate places
and come here to enjoy ourselves.
>
> I thought that's what AW was supposed to be about
>
> Perhaps I'm wrong.........
>
>
>
>
> What bothers me is the fact that all this debate, arguement, hostility,
whatever you'd like to call it,
[View Quote]

Apr 9, 2003, 4:22am

People are just bored, then they will argue about anything, maybe I should
state something political or religious, so that they would bash me instead
of you LOL

Drac
ryan <ryan_jacob at hotmail.com> kirjoitti
viestissä:3e93413f$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Oops, didn't mean to cause all this controversy. Maybe I ought to post in
> worldbuilders next time :) Not that there is going to be a next time..I'm
> not changing my citname again.
>
> I was gonna post in community, but feeling like I would get some jeering
> there, I decided to post here. Oops. :)
>
> Ryan
>
>
>
[View Quote]

Apr 22, 2003, 1:15pm

Unfortunatly triggerhappiness seems to be the word of today. The one beeing
currently in power is always right. You should enjoy it Bowen, you got to
taste the freedom of GKs, you better accept it or cry and accept it.
No matter what you will say or how wrong you think it is, someone more
powerfull than you have decided that they are the only truth. Your ejection
was simply pre-emptive, you could have said something not G-rated, after all
you could have the capabilty to do it. So dont whine, I know you are pro
pre-emptive measures ;-)

Drac
bowen <thisguyrules at 7k2.4mg.com.ANTISPAM> kirjoitti
viestissä:3ea23660 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Lavishh: chicken breasts isnt profane
> MR KEBO: hi Leighsa
> tonycat o: anyone seen my Karren tonight?
> Bowen: it's quite G rated
> Anru: hi Leighsa
> MR KEBO: you stop too Bowen
> tonycat o: hello Leighsa
> Bowen: breasts is also G rated depending on the term
> Leighsa: hi MrKebo
> Lavishh: too much
> MR KEBO: trhats it
> Leighsa: hi tony
> Bobabri2: *covers ears*
> Bowen: as long as it's not entrenching into sexual discussion
> Leighsa: hi anru
> "Horaz": hi
> Bowen: hey, I'm simply pointing out the rules
> "CLover": *covers eyes*
> Immigration Officer: You have been ejected from awgate
>
> Don't agree and put what the guidelines mean into words while at the gate,
that's
> forbidden... follow up telegrams:
>
> Telegram from MR KEBO, sent just now:
> what ever...report me and stop me from being a GK ,,, OH Big DEAL ,,
Yaaaaaaaaaa
> Horrrrawwwwwwwwwwww Go for it Yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
>
> Telegram from MR KEBO, sent just now:
> OK what Every MAN ... Do What U think U should Like I really give A FLYING
:LEAP....
> I dont GAVE A BULLS ASS . OK ?? GOOD ??? HAPPY ?? GREAT !!!!
>
> I just love the dogmatic ideals of a GK. They're so professional, as
well. I'll
> forgo reporting until, maybe... if I feel it's necessary and I see how
other people
> feel and think about this.
>
> --Bowen--
>
>

1  ...  3  4  5  6  7  8  ...  18  |   Order by default