Board ArchivesSite FeaturesActiveworlds SupportHistoric Archives |
derk // User Search
derk // User Searchimprovements pageJan 29, 2001, 5:20pm
My word you are angry aren't you...
I have read you post and I agree wholeheartedly with all your assertions but one. And it is this one that will keep you angry and nobody interested in what you have to say. There is never ever a need to personally attack anyone, you can still be right without all the personal stuff and you would be happier as well. Instead your points are lost in the constant barrage of attack on individuals... D [View Quote] improvements pageJan 31, 2001, 1:14pm
[View Quote]
Are you really ASKING me or is this just another of you whining small minded
posts..? If you are asking then perhaps you might try looking at the concept of "blame". Of what earthly good is it? How can laying blame help anyone when all it really does is hurt and antagonize others. And further, what makes your point of view "right" and Roland's wrong? I am not defending him (he doesn't need my defense) Roland already has the authority. You my friend have the problem. Equally tho, I'm not attacking you. It is said that "the best defense is no defense" so my suggestion is that you are right, only the way you are going about it is defeating you. If you leave out the personal stuff - insults and character attacks - your ideas on there own will carry the weight need to bring about change. Of course it will be slow but it will be change whereas with your present modality all that will happen will be that in the main you will gain the disrespect of those around you and at best you will be included in a small fringe cult of the same elk. You want a revolution so look to the great revolutionaries for inspiration - Nelson Mandela, Gandi, the Beetles, to name a few, never attacked the enemy - THAT WAS THEIR STRENGTH - If you believe in yourself and the pursuit of you goal and you don't want defeat then walk boldly into the enemies camp with your arms outstretched in an offering of peace... Hey, in your lifetime wars have been won, governments have fallen, and whole systems of thought have be swayed to the opposite of what they were using the single principal of peaceful non- aggression. Be you not mistaken friend, you are asking for revolution - that is not the point here tho. The point is do you want to win the revolution or not? 'People will not remember you for what you say or do but for how you made them feel' B Re: Infinite Cell Limit?Jan 30, 2001, 3:49am
Felix I believe that Roland will ignore anything but posts cocerning BUGS so
all I hear him saying is save yourself the grief and typing and submit your ideas thru the propper channels... I'm sure you already know that little gratitude goes a long way and if the ppl who make AW possible (almost for free) got some ok feedback I'm sure it would go both ways... I am interested in the NT debate, it is very forward thinking to prepare AW for this kind of platform - I work in a small network of about 30 machines and I can see lots of great app's in it. At the moment I run 98 on 1 of the machines so I can use AW. Thanx AW D [View Quote] Re: Infinite Cell Limit?Jan 31, 2001, 12:23pm
"builderz" <sawran at yahoo.com> wrote :
> Maybe a 3,000 message e-mail bomb to roland at activeworlds.com or a 1,000 > message telegram bomb to Roland with your bug/wishlist feature may > change his mind? ;) > I can't see you lasting long at anything friend - what is this meant to be a joke or are you only 5 years old for real... Grow up... D |